Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Fields for user assigned/limited licenses #26

Closed
ff05 opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Add Fields for user assigned/limited licenses #26

ff05 opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ff05
Copy link

ff05 commented Sep 15, 2023

I'd like to store some more information about some licenses
for example a confluence Server License:
number of licensed Users
users currently assigned
as comment: users get there license via ldap group synchronization

or for example volumelicenses:
number of licenses
users currently holding these licenses
as comment: where to find the installer

@ff05 ff05 changed the title Add Fields for user assigned licenses Add Fields for user assigned/limited licenses Sep 15, 2023
@MartVisser
Copy link

Nice to see that you are using or want to start using the plugin!

I can agree with adding the fields:

  • 'licence_amount' for volume licences
  • 'comments' for any comments about the licence (like other models in Netbox with a nice write/preview mode while adding/changing)

I am not yet convinced about an open field 'users', seems somewhat duplicate to me with the relation to an 'installation'. Perhaps it could be linked to another (to be created) model within Netbox? Or maybe just a field 'license_amount_used' and then the users in the comments field.

@MartVisser MartVisser added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 15, 2023
@MartVisser
Copy link

Another option is to arrange it via the custom field functionality within Netbox itself. See https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/customization/custom-fields/

I'm going to close this issue due to inactivity. If this is still relevant, please do not hesitate to reopen this issue or submit a PR.

@MartVisser MartVisser closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 28, 2023
@wkoot wkoot closed this as completed Feb 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants