-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dom refactor tab loader #554
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ing mzml argument with origin
Merge from master
merge from master
Issue 497 fix
…serialized in isatab2json conversion
Fix to determining JSON directory location.
The previous regex didn't match any DOI I tried. I found this one in a blog post from Crossref where they say it matched 74.4M out of 74.9M DOIs that they have seen. The post is here: https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-and-matching-regular-expressions/
Since the DOI regex works now there are 2 fewer warnings. Previously it was warning about valid DOIs.
Testing changes to run on Windows.
Update defaults.py
The last changes were initially tested and created on Windows, but had errors on GitHub. I fixed those errors, but didn't retest on Windows. This has been tested on both and is problem free.
i_df and investigation_df are not a DataFrame as indicated in parameter typing or as the name would suggest. It's actually a dictionary of DataFrames and lists of DataFrames. I have renamed them to reflect this.
There were 2 tests that needed to be changed to match the new naming.
More changes
Rename i_df and investigation_df.
Fix rule and check.
I started editing this function because of the "Only one protocol reference should be used in a Protocol REF column." message(s), but I found some other issues to address as well.
The messaging on the 2 checks dealing with study assays did not make it clear exactly which assay and which study had the issue. I changed the messaging so it clearly indicates the affected study and assay.
Fairly significant changes to check_protocol_fields
Changed messaging on study assays errors
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First pass at refactoring isa tab loader