Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Is922/wrong-null-substitution #5269

Conversation

matusdrobuliak66
Copy link
Contributor

@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 commented Jan 25, 2024

What do these changes do?

When providing in config file RESOURCE_USAGE_TRACKER_S3=null
In docker-compose yaml file environment section this:
- RESOURCE_USAGE_TRACKER_S3=${RESOURCE_USAGE_TRACKER_S3} substitutes for empty string,
while RESOURCE_USAGE_TRACKER_S3: ${RESOURCE_USAGE_TRACKER_S3} substitutes correctly to null value

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev Checklist

DevOps Checklist

matusdrobuliak66 and others added 30 commits November 10, 2023 15:49
…iak66/osparc-simcore into is922/auto-recharge-emit-msg
@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2024 13:26
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d6b958e) 86.4% compared to head (46eab94) 77.3%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #5269     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    86.4%   77.3%   -9.2%     
========================================
  Files        1306    1306             
  Lines       53510   53510             
  Branches     1170    1170             
========================================
- Hits        46280   41368   -4912     
- Misses       6981   11900   +4919     
+ Partials      249     242      -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests 58.3% <ø> (-1.0%) ⬇️
unittests 84.5% <ø> (-0.7%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 237 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@YuryHrytsuk YuryHrytsuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙌

@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 enabled auto-merge (squash) January 25, 2024 13:29
Copy link
Member

@mrnicegyu11 mrnicegyu11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

merci, nice find!

@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 self-assigned this Jan 25, 2024
@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 added this to the This is Sparta! milestone Jan 25, 2024
@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 merged commit 3c18555 into ITISFoundation:master Jan 25, 2024
54 checks passed
@matusdrobuliak66 matusdrobuliak66 mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2024
39 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants