Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow no whitespace between lambda keyword and params in certain cases #934

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

zsol added 4 commits May 27, 2023 10:07
For an expression like `f"{one:{two:}{three}}"`, `three` is not in an f-string spec, and should be tokenized accordingly.

This PR fixes the `format_spec_count` bookkeeping in the tokenizer, so it properly decrements it when a closing `}` is encountered but only if the `}` closes a format_spec.

Reported in #930.
This is an obscure one.

`_ if 0else _` failed to parse with some very weird errors. It turns out that the tokenizer tries to parse `0else` as a single number, but when it encounters `l` it realizes it can't be a single number and it backtracks.

Unfortunately the backtracking logic was broken, and it failed to correctly backtrack one of the offsets used for whitespace parsing (the byte offset since the start of the line). This caused whitespace nodes to refer to incorrect parts of the input text, eventually resulting in the above behavior.

This PR fixes the bookkeeping when the tokenizer backtracks.

Reported in #930.
Python accepts code where `lambda` follows a `*`, so this PR relaxes validation rules for Lambdas.

Raised in #930.
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 27, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (59aeceb) 90.92% compared to head (744d6fd) 90.93%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #934   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.92%   90.93%           
=======================================
  Files         254      254           
  Lines       25937    25943    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        23584    23590    +6     
  Misses       2353     2353           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
libcst/_nodes/tests/test_lambda.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
libcst/_nodes/expression.py 96.76% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

zsol added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
#936, #935, #934, #933, #932, #931)

* Allow walrus in slices

See python/cpython#23317

Raised in #930.

* Fix parsing of nested f-string specifiers

For an expression like `f"{one:{two:}{three}}"`, `three` is not in an f-string spec, and should be tokenized accordingly.

This PR fixes the `format_spec_count` bookkeeping in the tokenizer, so it properly decrements it when a closing `}` is encountered but only if the `}` closes a format_spec.

Reported in #930.

* Fix tokenizing `0else`

This is an obscure one.

`_ if 0else _` failed to parse with some very weird errors. It turns out that the tokenizer tries to parse `0else` as a single number, but when it encounters `l` it realizes it can't be a single number and it backtracks.

Unfortunately the backtracking logic was broken, and it failed to correctly backtrack one of the offsets used for whitespace parsing (the byte offset since the start of the line). This caused whitespace nodes to refer to incorrect parts of the input text, eventually resulting in the above behavior.

This PR fixes the bookkeeping when the tokenizer backtracks.

Reported in #930.

* Allow no whitespace between lambda keyword and params in certain cases

Python accepts code where `lambda` follows a `*`, so this PR relaxes validation rules for Lambdas.

Raised in #930.

* Allow any expression in comprehensions' evaluated expression


This PR relaxes the accepted types for the `elt` field in `ListComp`, `SetComp`, and `GenExp`, as well as the `key` and `value` fields in `DictComp`.

Fixes #500.

* Allow no space around an ifexp in certain cases

For example in `_ if _ else""if _ else _`.

Raised in #930. Also fixes #854.

* Allow no spaces after `as` in a contextmanager in certain cases

Like in `with foo()as():pass`

Raised in #930.

* Allow no spaces around walrus in certain cases

Like in `[_:=''for _ in _]`

Raised in #930.

* Allow no whitespace after lambda body in certain cases

Like in `[lambda:()for _ in _]`

Reported in #930.
@zsol zsol closed this Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants