-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Perormance regressions introduced by latest changes to main #886
Comments
We're having conversations about this in multiple separate issues, let's keep it in this dedicated thread ?
Do you still need a minimal reproducer ? I haven't come up with one yet. Yet again it's not trivial to reproduce, simple kernels still work. If you have a commit that revert those changes I can easily say if it fixes the issues though. (basically running the benchmark script in https://github.com/soda-inria/sklearn-numba-dpex ) |
@fcharras No we do not need th reproducer. Let @chudur-budur open the PR and then you can test and let us know if the issue is fixed. |
@chudur-budur @diptorupd please see #898 that give a minimal reproducer for what caused the regression I was facing, which is more than a performance issue. However, it appears fixing it will not be the end. After understanding the bug I could test the But~ there are two more important issues to solve first IMO. |
Closing the issue as the caching related performance regressions have been addressed and the code generation issue in #898 is solved. |
Originally posted by @fcharras in #816 (comment)
Originally posted by @fcharras in #867 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: