-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for biblatex field aliases #521
Closed
koppor opened this issue
Dec 15, 2015
· 3 comments
· May be fixed by HITOSS/jabref#3, HITOSS/jabref#4 or HITOSS/jabref#5
Closed
Add support for biblatex field aliases #521
koppor opened this issue
Dec 15, 2015
· 3 comments
· May be fixed by HITOSS/jabref#3, HITOSS/jabref#4 or HITOSS/jabref#5
Labels
Comments
The related bug report on sf isn't relevant, since this was only about the mere possibility to use the |
4 tasks
This is now implemented in the latest development version (at least if I understand it correctly). Could you please check the build from http://builds.jabref.org/master/. Thanks! |
Merged
This was referenced Jun 30, 2022
This was referenced Jul 15, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In the biblatex documentation at Section 2.2.5, "Field Aliases" are described.
Issue: When switching from bibtex to biblatex mode, the field "journal" is written as optional field, even though it is a required field.
quick hack
In the serialization of JabRef, aliased fields should be treated like the original fields.
Issue with the quick hack: The aliased field is still treated as optional field or not treated at all. This seems to be inconsistent.
related bug reports
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: