-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kalman dev #850
Kalman dev #850
Conversation
…ixed the field map not to return 0 for points outside the limits in x (was producing NaN results on some tracks).
This branch is quite a bit behind master at the moment. Please consider pulling master and rerunning your checks to make sure everything is still good after merging in the current master. git will be able to merge automatically via the normal recursive strategy, so don't worry about that (I already did this). I am currently running a few checks of this myself. |
Hi Cam, Thank you for checking this! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ran a few files with this and iss837, and master all merged. Look reasonable to me. I also checked that is passes the integration tests.
The results from running on the 2019 sample partitions, currently at https://www.slac.stanford.edu/~bravo/KF_vs_GBL_Tight_pBot_2019/KF_vs_GBL_Tight_pBot_2019.html use these three commits. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This adds new functionality and fixes a few known issues.
Does not affect legacy reconstruction.
Code builds and tests pass.
Please proceed.
Kalman dev