-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Online recon dev #868
Online recon dev #868
Conversation
… updates to log messsages
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've not explicitly run this, but the existing tests run to completion and it adds needed functionality.
Please proceed.
String[] flagNames = {"svt_bias_good", "svt_position_good", "svt_burstmode_noise_good", "svt_event_header_good", "svt_latency_good", "svt_readout_overlap_good"}; | ||
private static Level LEVEL = Level.WARNING; | ||
|
||
String[] flagNames = {"svt_bias_good", "svt_position_good", "svt_burstmode_noise_good", "svt_event_header_good", "svt_latency_good"}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this will break the apv25 readout crosstalk filter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't look like it does as this gets overwritten by the steering file. Is there a reason for removing "svt_readout_overlap_good" from this here though? I would prefer we just keep it so a list of all possible flags is kept here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be fixed now. I reverted the flag names array.
Unintentional change - I will revert it.
…On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 6:22 PM Cameron Bravo ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In recon/src/main/java/org/hps/recon/filtering/EventFlagFilter.java
<#868 (comment)>:
> @@ -10,8 +11,9 @@
public class EventFlagFilter extends EventReconFilter {
private static Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(EventFlagFilter.class.getPackage().getName());
-
- String[] flagNames = {"svt_bias_good", "svt_position_good", "svt_burstmode_noise_good", "svt_event_header_good", "svt_latency_good", "svt_readout_overlap_good"};
+ private static Level LEVEL = Level.WARNING;
+
+ String[] flagNames = {"svt_bias_good", "svt_position_good", "svt_burstmode_noise_good", "svt_event_header_good", "svt_latency_good"};
It doesn't look like it does as this gets overwritten by the steering
file. Is there a reason for removing "svt_readout_overlap_good" from this
here though? I would prefer we just keep it so a list of all possible flags
is kept here.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#868 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQXV47ZZQ4YVYIVJAY7EDDTQAQSHANCNFSM45VFLSVQ>
.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly additions to the code only slightly touching code that already existed. I also ran reco on a 2019 evio file and didn't see any obvious issues.
This is the currently working version of the online recon and monitoring tools, as described in several software meeting presentations, resolving #733.
These changes implement a server which is able to launch instances of the reconstruction which fill remote AIDA trees. These are aggregated and can be viewed in a web browser or JAS3.
A working test configuration can be found here:
https://github.com/JeremyMcCormick/hps-projects/tree/master/projects/online-recon-test
Documentation is on Confluence:
https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/Online+Reconstruction+Tools