-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve conflict handling #154
Conversation
Renable conflict checking, was disabled for testing, forgot to reenable Use pacman --ask to remove conflicting packages, dont do it directly. Say what each package conflicts with Check for conflicts before aking for clean build Reverse conflict are still not checked
@AladW You closed the talk section so I'll just link you here. This commit removed
I don't remember you pointing it out anywhere here. May you're confused with trizen? trizen/trizen@ba687bc |
I mentioned in the comments of the commit adding -Rdd edit: note that "closing" a discussion on the wiki just means that someone might remove it after 7 days, the page can still be edited. I closed it since in the end everyone kept repeating their own points without progress otherwise, and having a yellow entry + explanation instead of a red or green entry seemed a reasonable compromise. |
This commit? 28515c8b |
Ah right, was in the middle of the page so I missed it some how. Sorry about that. Would like to point out that It was removed the day after that comment. |
Changed the entry to "partial" then for now. If #130 is implemented yay should be back to the top section of the table |
#146 Is fixed in the git only, that's why I had not changed the wiki myself. We're due a release in a day so I don't know if it's worth the effort of changing it back. |
Eh, don't worry about it. Thanks for making those improvements. |
Oh, I see what you mean now. The wiki table used to have entries by name only, not actual AUR packages. So it should probably reflect how the release version performs as you say. As I agree it's not worth changing back the colors, I've just added a "yay-git" to the entry. |
Yeah that seems like the best way to do it. As long as the table doesn't end up getting flooded with helper-git* exceptions dotted around. |
Renable conflict checking, was disabled for testing, forgot to reenable
Use pacman --ask to remove conflicting packages, dont do it directly.
Say what each package conflicts with
Check for conflicts before aking for clean build
Reverse conflict are still not checked
Example output:
Relies on Jguer/go-alpm#4