Form editor v2 #579
Form editor v2 #579
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve enhancements to the form handling system across multiple components. Key updates include the addition of methods for managing fields, a refactor of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 47
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (46)
client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSubSection.vue (2)
1-17: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.The template structure is well-organized, utilizing a responsive flex layout and Tailwind CSS classes effectively. The use of the
UCardcomponent and a slot for content insertion provides flexibility for various use cases.To enhance accessibility, consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes. For example:
- <h3 class="text-lg font-semibold mb-1"> + <h3 class="text-lg font-semibold mb-1" aria-level="3">This change explicitly defines the heading level for screen readers, improving the overall accessibility of the component.
19-30: LGTM! Consider adding more specific prop validation.The script section is well-structured, utilizing the Vue 3 Composition API with
setupsyntax. The prop definitions are clear and include type checking, which is excellent for maintaining component integrity.To further improve prop validation, consider adding more specific constraints:
defineProps({ title: { type: String, - required: true + required: true, + validator: (value) => value.trim().length > 0 }, description: { type: String, - required: true + required: true, + validator: (value) => value.trim().length > 0 } })This change ensures that the
titleanddescriptionprops are not only required but also contain non-empty strings after trimming whitespace.client/components/open/forms/components/BlockTypeIcon.vue (1)
23-25: Consider adding null checks for safer property access.The computed properties assume that
blocksTypes[props.type]always exists. To prevent potential runtime errors, consider adding null checks or using optional chaining.Here's a suggested improvement:
-const bgClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.bg_class || '') -const textClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.text_class || '') -const icon = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.icon || '') +const bgClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.bg_class ?? '') +const textClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.text_class ?? '') +const icon = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.icon ?? '')This change uses the nullish coalescing operator (
??) instead of the logical OR (||), which will only fall back to the empty string if the property isnullorundefined, not for other falsy values like an empty string.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/EditorSectionHeader.vue (1)
24-39: LGTM with a minor suggestion for prop validationThe script section looks good. The use of
<script setup>and the prop definitions are appropriate for this presentational component.Consider adding validator functions to the
iconandtitleprops to ensure they're not empty strings. This can help catch potential issues early. Here's an example of how you could modify the props:defineProps({ icon: { type: String, - required: true + required: true, + validator: (value) => value.trim().length > 0 }, title: { type: String, - required: true + required: true, + validator: (value) => value.trim().length > 0 }, showLine: { type: Boolean, default: true } })This change will ensure that neither
iconnortitlecan be empty strings.client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSection.vue (1)
27-29: Consider adding default values for injected dependenciesWhile the current implementation works, it might be beneficial to provide more meaningful default values for the injected dependencies.
Consider updating the injected dependencies as follows:
-const activeSection = inject('activeSection', ref('')) -const registerSection = inject('registerSection', () => {}) -const unregisterSection = inject('unregisterSection', () => {}) +const activeSection = inject('activeSection', ref('')) +const registerSection = inject('registerSection', (name, icon) => console.warn(`Section ${name} not registered`)) +const unregisterSection = inject('unregisterSection', (name) => console.warn(`Section ${name} not unregistered`))This change will provide more informative feedback if the component is used outside of its intended context.
client/components/open/editors/EditorRightSidebar.vue (1)
23-26: LGTM: New prop for customizable sidebar widthThe addition of the
widthClassprop is well-implemented, allowing for customizable sidebar width. The default value suggests the use of Tailwind CSS for responsive design.Consider adding a brief comment or documentation for this prop to explain its purpose and expected values, especially if it's intended to be used by other developers. For example:
/** * CSS class(es) to control the sidebar's width. * Defaults to Tailwind's responsive max-width class. */ widthClass: { type: String, default: 'md:max-w-[20rem]', },client/components/forms/ColorInput.vue (1)
17-21: LGTM! Improved styling flexibility for the label.The addition of the theme-based font size class enhances the consistency with other form inputs and provides better styling flexibility.
Consider using a more generic naming for the theme property, such as
theme.Input.fontSizeinstead oftheme.SelectInput.fontSize, as this is a color input, not a select input. This would improve consistency across different input types.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSettings.vue (1)
1-15: LGTM! Consider adding a submit button if appropriate.The template structure is well-organized, using child components for different aspects of form settings. The flexible styling and prevent modifier on submit are good practices. However, there's no visible submit button. If form submission is handled elsewhere, this is fine. Otherwise, consider adding a submit button for better user experience.
client/components/open/editors/UndoRedo.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-58: Summary: Consistent styling changes with no functional impactThe changes in this file focus on removing shadow effects from the UndoRedo component elements. These modifications create a flatter, more consistent design without altering the component's functionality. The use of a store for managing undo/redo logic and the implementation of keyboard shortcuts demonstrate good practices in Vue.js development.
A few observations and suggestions:
- The styling changes are consistent across all elements (UButtonGroup and both buttons).
- The disabled state styling is preserved, ensuring good user experience.
- The component's logic, including store integration and keyboard shortcuts, remains unchanged and well-implemented.
Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for the styling change, especially if it's part of a larger design update across the application.
api/database/migrations/2024_09_23_054851_add_description_to_form_properties.php (1)
1-47: Overall assessment: Well-structured migration with minor improvements neededThis migration effectively moves the 'description' field from the Form model to a property within the 'properties' array, allowing for more flexible form structures. The use of chunking is commendable for efficient processing of potentially large datasets.
Key strengths:
- Efficient data processing using chunking.
- Reversible migration with a well-implemented
down()method.- Follows Laravel's migration patterns.
Areas for improvement:
- Potential for duplicate 'Description' properties in the
up()method.- Inconsistent timestamp handling between
up()anddown()methods.Consider the following recommendations:
- Implement a check to prevent duplicate 'Description' properties in the
up()method.- Ensure consistent timestamp handling in both
up()anddown()methods.- Add logging or error handling for cases where the migration encounters issues with specific forms.
- Consider adding a database transaction to ensure atomicity of the migration process.
These improvements will enhance the robustness and reliability of the migration, minimizing potential issues during execution and rollback scenarios.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomCode.vue (3)
2-5: LGTM! Consider extracting the icon name to a constant.The replacement of
<editor-options-panel>with<SettingsSection>looks good and likely improves UI consistency. The use of props for the name and icon enhances reusability.Consider extracting the icon name to a constant or config file for easier maintenance:
+const CODE_BRACKET_ICON = 'i-heroicons-code-bracket' <SettingsSection name="Custom Code" - icon="i-heroicons-code-bracket" + :icon="CODE_BRACKET_ICON" >
6-21: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label to the link.The addition of the
<ProTag>component and the updated description improve the user interface and provide clearer information. The link to an example CSS code is a helpful addition.Consider adding an aria-label to the link for better accessibility:
<a href="#" class="text-gray-700" + aria-label="View example CSS code" @click.prevent=" crisp.openHelpdeskArticle( 'how-do-i-add-custom-code-to-my-form-1amadj3', ) " >Click here to get an example CSS code.</a>
36-50: LGTM! Consider adding type annotations.The script changes look good. The ProTag import, use of storeToRefs, and addition of crisp are all appropriate for the component's functionality.
Consider adding type annotations to improve code readability and maintainability:
-import { useWorkingFormStore } from '../../../../../stores/working_form' +import { useWorkingFormStore } from '../../../../../stores/working_form' +import type { Ref } from 'vue' +import type { Form } from '~/types' export default { components: { ProTag }, setup () { const workingFormStore = useWorkingFormStore() return { workingFormStore, - form: storeToRefs(workingFormStore).content, + form: storeToRefs(workingFormStore).content as Ref<Form>, crisp: useCrisp() } } }client/components/global/Settings/SettingsWrapper.vue (2)
1-28: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.The template structure is well-organized and effectively implements a settings layout with a dynamic sidebar and main content area. The use of UButton components and conditional styling for the active section is appropriate.
To enhance accessibility, consider adding ARIA attributes to the navigation and list elements. For example:
- <nav class="w-64 flex-shrink-0 overflow-y-auto border-r p-4 sticky top-0 bg-gray-50"> - <ul class="space-y-2"> + <nav class="w-64 flex-shrink-0 overflow-y-auto border-r p-4 sticky top-0 bg-gray-50" aria-label="Settings sections"> + <ul class="space-y-2" role="list">
36-62: LGTM! Consider handling edge case in unregisterSection.The registerSection and unregisterSection functions are well-implemented, correctly managing the sections array and activeSection. The use of provide to share data with child components is appropriate.
In the unregisterSection function, consider handling the case where all sections are removed:
const unregisterSection = (name) => { const index = sections.value.findIndex(section => section.name === name) if (index !== -1) { sections.value.splice(index, 1) if (activeSection.value === name && sections.value.length > 0) { activeSection.value = sections.value[0].name + } else if (sections.value.length === 0) { + activeSection.value = '' } } }This ensures that activeSection is set to an empty string when all sections are removed, preventing potential undefined values.
client/nuxt.config.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Summary of changes and their impactThe changes in this file contribute to the form editor v2 update:
- Global registration of form components: This change allows easier use of form components throughout the application, supporting the overall form handling system update.
- Minor UI icons formatting improvement: This change doesn't directly impact functionality but improves code readability.
These modifications align with the PR objectives for updating the form handling system. However, please address the duplicate component configuration to ensure clean and efficient code.
Consider reviewing the entire components configuration to ensure there are no other redundancies and that the structure aligns with the new form editor requirements.
client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (1)
47-47: Great addition of theelementpropThe new
elementprop enhances the component's flexibility by allowing parent components to specify the HTML element type to be rendered. The default value of 'div' ensures backwards compatibility.Consider adding a brief comment or JSDoc to document the purpose and possible values of this prop. For example:
/** * The HTML element type to be rendered. * @type {string} * @default 'div' */ element: { type: String, default: 'div' },client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSecurityAccess.vue (2)
30-42: Consider adding a preview for the closed form textThe conditional rendering for the closed form text is correct. However, it might be helpful to provide a preview of how the message will appear to users when the form is closed.
Consider adding a toggle to show a preview of the closed form message, which could help form creators better understand how their message will be presented to users.
75-81: Consider adding more information about CAPTCHAThe bot protection toggle is implemented correctly, but users might benefit from more information about how the CAPTCHA works and its impact on form submission.
Consider adding a link to documentation or a tooltip that explains the CAPTCHA feature in more detail, including any potential impact on user experience.
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/MatrixFieldOptions.vue (2)
4-9: LGTM! Consider adding vertical padding.The introduction of the
EditorSectionHeadercomponent improves consistency and simplifies the markup. However, the removal of thepy-2class might affect the vertical spacing.Consider adding some vertical padding to maintain proper spacing:
- class="px-4" + class="px-4 py-2"
Line range hint
1-138: Overall, good improvements to UI consistency.The changes enhance the UI consistency without altering the core functionality of the component. This is a positive step towards a more standardized interface.
Consider extracting the matrix row and column management logic into separate components or composables to improve code organization and reusability. This could make the component easier to maintain and test in the future.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (3)
21-49: Improved layout and structure for input blocksThe changes to the input blocks section, including the switch to a flex column layout and the use of a template for draggable items, are good improvements. They enhance the structure and flexibility of the component.
Consider removing the
@click.preventon line 39 if the div is not within a form or anchor tag, as it might be unnecessary:- @click.prevent="addBlock(element.name)" + @click="addBlock(element.name)"
85-107: Improved component structure with<script setup>syntaxThe transition to
<script setup>syntax and the introduction of computed properties forinputBlocksandlayoutBlocksare excellent improvements. They enhance the reactivity and readability of the component. The use of theuseWorkingFormStorecomposable is also in line with Vue 3 best practices.The
handleInputClonefunction can be simplified. Instead of:const handleInputClone = (item) => { return item.name }You can use a more concise arrow function:
const handleInputClone = (item) => item.nameThis achieves the same result with a more compact syntax.
Line range hint
110-115: Consider alternative approach for stylingWhile the current style section is concise and appropriately scoped, the use of the
@applydirective in Vue components is generally discouraged. It can lead to inconsistencies and make it harder to track style changes.Consider using standard CSS properties instead of the
@applydirective. This approach provides better clarity and maintainability. Here's an example of how you could rewrite the styles:<style lang="scss" scoped> .ghost-item { background-color: rgba(59, 130, 246, 0.1); border-radius: 0.375rem; width: 100%; grid-column: 1 / -1; } :global(.dark) .ghost-item { background-color: rgba(30, 58, 138, 0.1); } </style>This approach allows for easier customization and better integration with Vue's style binding capabilities if needed in the future.
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (2)
2-50: Improved layout and functionalityThe template changes significantly enhance the component's structure and usability:
- The addition of the required "Block Name" input improves form completeness.
- The
HiddenRequiredDisabledcomponent likely consolidates visibility and requirement logic, which is a good practice for code reusability.- The grid layout for width and alignment selection improves the organization of input fields.
Consider adding a
v-elsecondition for the alignment input to make the logic more explicit:- <select-input - v-if="['nf-text', 'nf-image'].includes(field.type)" + <select-input + v-else-if="['nf-text', 'nf-image'].includes(field.type)" name="align" class="flex-grow" :options="[ { name: 'Left', value: 'left' }, { name: 'Center', value: 'center' }, { name: 'Right', value: 'right' }, { name: 'Justify', value: 'justify' }, ]" :form="field" label="Alignment" />This change would make it clearer that the alignment input is an alternative to the width input for specific field types.
Line range hint
55-110: Well-structured conditional rendering for different field typesThe conditional rendering for various field types ('nf-text', 'nf-page-break', 'nf-image', 'nf-code') is well-implemented, allowing for a flexible and dynamic form structure. Each field type has appropriate inputs and layouts tailored to its specific needs.
The inclusion of navigation button customization for the 'nf-page-break' field type is a particularly good UX feature.
For consistency in styling, consider applying the same border class to all conditional blocks:
<div v-if="field.type == 'nf-text'" - class="border-t py-2" + class="border-t border-b py-2" > <!-- ... --> </div> <div v-else-if="field.type == 'nf-page-break'" class="border-b py-2 px-4" > <!-- ... --> </div> <div v-else-if="field.type == 'nf-image'" - class="border-t py-2" + class="border-t border-b py-2" > <!-- ... --> </div> <div v-else-if="field.type == 'nf-code'" - class="border-t" + class="border-t border-b py-2" > <!-- ... --> </div>This change would ensure a consistent visual separation between different sections of the form.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomSeo.vue (1)
6-15: Enhanced SEO & Social Sharing sectionThe addition of a clear heading for "SEO & Social Sharing - Meta" improves the organization of the form. The
ProTagcomponent is a good way to highlight premium features.However, the description text could be more specific about what Open Graph is and its benefits.
Consider updating the description to be more informative:
- Customize the image and text that appear when you share your form on other - sites (Open Graph). + Customize the image and text that appear when you share your form on social + media platforms using Open Graph metadata, enhancing visibility and engagement.client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (2)
3-13: Consider improving accessibility for the back buttonThe back button implementation looks good, but consider adding an
aria-labelfor better accessibility.<a v-if="backButton" href="#" class="ml-2 flex text-blue font-semibold text-sm -m-1 hover:bg-blue-500/10 rounded-md p-1 group" + aria-label="Go back" @click.prevent="$emit('go-back')" > <Icon name="heroicons:arrow-left-20-solid" class="text-blue mr-1 w-6 h-6 group-hover:-translate-x-0.5 transition-all" /> </a>
48-67: Consider adding keyboard accessibility to the help buttonThe help button looks good, but consider adding keyboard accessibility for better user experience.
<a v-track.form_editor_help_button_clicked href="#" class="text-sm p-2 hover:bg-gray-100 cursor-pointer rounded-lg text-gray-500 hover:text-gray-800 cursor-pointer" + role="button" + tabindex="0" + @keyup.enter="crisp.openHelpdesk()" @click.prevent="crisp.openHelpdesk()" > <Icon name="heroicons:question-mark-circle" class="w-5 h-5" /> </a>client/data/blocks_types.json (1)
98-100: Address minor inconsistencies for improved code qualityThere are a couple of minor inconsistencies in the file:
- The "files" block type uses a plural name, while others are singular.
- There's an unnecessary empty line (line 123).
Consider the following changes:
- Rename "files" to "file" for consistency with other singular block type names.
- Remove the empty line 123 to maintain consistent spacing throughout the file.
These changes will improve overall code consistency and readability.
Also applies to: 123-123
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (2)
20-35: Enhanced color customization and mode selectionThe addition of the color input for buttons and input borders, along with the color mode selection, greatly improves the customization options for users. The color mode options (Auto, Light, Dark) with the helpful explanation for the "Auto" option enhance accessibility and user preference.
Consider adding a help text to the color input similar to the color mode input, explaining where the selected color will be applied (e.g., "This color will be applied to buttons and input borders").
60-64: Enhanced customization options and improved labelingThe addition of the uppercase labels toggle and the updates to existing toggles (hide title and show progress bar) enhance the customization options and improve clarity. The additional help text for the progress bar toggle provides useful information to the user.
For consistency, consider adding help text to the "Uppercase Input Labels" toggle similar to other inputs, explaining the effect of this option (e.g., "This will convert all input labels to uppercase").
Also applies to: 145-147, 150-157
api/tests/Feature/Forms/FormTest.php (1)
Line range hint
1-192: Summary of changes and their implicationsThe modifications in this file are consistent with the reported changes to the
Formmodel, specifically the removal of the 'description' field. The test cases have been updated to reflect this change, and a new assertion for the 'Copy of ' prefix in duplicated form titles has been added.These changes imply:
- The 'description' field is no longer part of the
Formmodel and related functionality.- Form duplication now includes a 'Copy of ' prefix in the title.
To ensure the changes are applied consistently across the codebase, please:
- Review the results of the verification scripts provided in the previous comments.
- Update any documentation or API specifications that may reference the removed 'description' field.
- Verify that any frontend components or views that previously displayed or used the 'description' field have been updated accordingly.
Consider adding a test case specifically for verifying the behavior when attempting to set or retrieve the removed 'description' field, to ensure it's properly handled (e.g., ignored or throwing an appropriate exception).
client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2)
55-66: LGTM! Minor suggestion for improvement.The updates to the password protection message display look good. The change from
VButtontoUButtonand the updated styling classes improve consistency with what seems to be a new design system.Consider adding an icon (e.g., an "X" or close icon) to the "Close" button for better visual cues. This can be done using the
iconprop ifUButtonsupports it:<UButton color="yellow" size="xs" icon="i-heroicons-x-mark-20-solid" @click="hidePasswordDisabledMsg = true" > Close </UButton>
Line range hint
1-424: Summary of changes and next stepsThe changes in this file appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort, possibly involving an update to the component library and some UX improvements. The main changes include:
- Updating the password protection message display
- Removing
VButtonand replacing it withUButton- Removing the form description section (not visible in the diff)
These changes seem intentional and consistent. However, to ensure a smooth transition, please:
- Verify the impact of the component library update by running the suggested script to check for any remaining
VButtonusage.- Clarify the reasoning behind the removal of the form description section and confirm its impact using the provided script.
- Consider adding an icon to the "Close" button for better visual cues.
Once these points are addressed, the changes can be approved.
As this seems to be part of a larger refactoring effort, consider creating a migration guide or updating the documentation to reflect these changes, especially if they affect other parts of the application or if other developers need to be aware of the new component usage patterns.
client/composables/forms/initForm.js (1)
Line range hint
5-42: Refactor to avoid duplication of default form valuesThe default values for form properties are defined both in the
initFormfunction (lines 5-42) and in thesetFormDefaultsfunction (lines 86-106). This duplication can lead to inconsistencies and increases maintenance effort.Consider extracting the default values into a shared constant and reusing it in both functions. Here is how you could refactor the code:
Define a constant for default form values:
+const DEFAULT_FORM_VALUES = { + title: "My Form", + visibility: "public", + workspace_id: null, + properties: [], + + // Customization + font_family: null, + theme: "default", + width: "centered", + dark_mode: "auto", + color: "#3B82F6", + hide_title: false, + no_branding: false, + uppercase_labels: false, + transparent_background: false, + closes_at: null, + closed_text: + "This form has now been closed by its owner and does not accept submissions anymore.", + auto_save: true, + auto_focus: true, + border_radius: 'small', + size: 'md', + + // Submission + submit_button_text: "Submit", + re_fillable: false, + re_fill_button_text: "Fill Again", + submitted_text: + "Amazing, we saved your answers. Thank you for your time and have a great day!", + use_captcha: false, + max_submissions_count: null, + max_submissions_reached_text: + "This form has now reached the maximum number of allowed submissions and is now closed.", + editable_submissions_button_text: "Edit submission", + confetti_on_submission: false, + + // Security & Privacy + can_be_indexed: true, + + // Custom SEO + seo_meta: {}, +};Update the
initFormfunction to use the shared default values:export const initForm = (defaultValue = {}, withDefaultProperties = false) => { - return useForm({ - title: "My Form", - visibility: "public", - workspace_id: null, - properties: withDefaultProperties ? getDefaultProperties() : [], - // ... other default properties ... - ...defaultValue, - }) + const initialValues = { + ...DEFAULT_FORM_VALUES, + properties: withDefaultProperties ? getDefaultProperties() : [], + ...defaultValue, + }; + return useForm(initialValues); }Update the
setFormDefaultsfunction to use the shared default values:export function setFormDefaults(formData) { - const defaultValues = { - // Duplicate default values - }; + const defaultValues = clonedeep(DEFAULT_FORM_VALUES); const filledFormData = clonedeep(formData); // Rest of the function remains the same }Also applies to: 86-106
client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue (3)
161-166: Add error handling for clipboard operationsThe
navigator.clipboard.writeTextmethod returns a Promise and may fail due to browser restrictions or user permissions. It's important to handle potential errors to provide feedback if copying fails.Apply this diff to handle the clipboard operation properly:
click: () => { - navigator.clipboard.writeText(field.value.id) - useAlert().success('Field ID copied to clipboard') + navigator.clipboard.writeText(field.value.id) + .then(() => { + useAlert().success('Field ID copied to clipboard') + }) + .catch(() => { + useAlert().error('Failed to copy Field ID') + }) }
128-140: Extract field types to a constant for maintainabilityThe array of field types in
typeCanBeChangedis hard-coded. Consider extracting it to a constant or configuration file to improve readability and make future updates easier.Apply this diff to define a constant:
+const changeableFieldTypes = [ + "text", + "email", + "phone_number", + "number", + "select", + "multi_select", + "rating", + "scale", + "slider", +] const typeCanBeChanged = computed(() => { - return [ - "text", - "email", - "phone_number", - "number", - "select", - "multi_select", - "rating", - "scale", - "slider", - ].includes(field.value.type) + return changeableFieldTypes.includes(field.value.type) })
172-178: Handle potential errors when duplicating a fieldWhen duplicating a field, errors might occur during the cloning process or when updating form properties. Adding try-catch blocks can ensure the application remains stable if unexpected issues arise.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
click: () => { + try { const newField = clonedeep(field.value) newField.id = generateUUID() newField.name = 'Copy of ' + newField.name const newFields = [...form.value.properties] newFields.splice(selectedFieldIndex.value + 1, 0, newField) form.value.properties = newFields + } catch (error) { + useAlert().error('Failed to duplicate the field') + console.error('Field duplication error:', error) + } }client/components/open/forms/components/FormFieldsEditor.vue (2)
132-136: Remove unuseddataoption to clean up the componentThe
datafunction is currently empty and does not serve any purpose. Removing it can simplify the component.Apply this diff to remove the unused
dataoption:-export default { name: 'FormFieldsEditor', components: { Draggable: draggable, EditableTag, BlockTypeIcon }, - data () { - return { - - } - }, mounted() { this.init() },
177-178: Maintain consistent code style by adding braces to theifstatementFor better readability and to prevent potential errors in the future, it's recommended to use braces
{}even for single-lineifstatements.Apply this diff to add braces:
toggleRequired (field) { field.required = !field.required - if (field.required) + if (field.required) { field.hidden = false + } }client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (2)
81-81: Clarify the necessity of bothclearableandshowClearButtonpropsThe condition
v-if="clearable && showClearButton && !isEmpty"introduces a new propshowClearButtonin addition to the existingclearableprop. Since both props control aspects of the clear button's functionality, consider whether both are necessary. This might introduce redundancy and potential confusion for users of the component.
227-227: EnsureshowClearButtonprop is documented and consistentThe new prop
showClearButtonwith a default value oftruehas been added. Please ensure that this prop is adequately documented in the component's documentation or README. This helps maintain consistency and assists other developers in understanding the new functionality.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (3)
4-4: Consistent Padding Adjustment in ContainerChanging the padding class from
py-2topb-2adjusts the vertical spacing by adding padding only to the bottom. Ensure this aligns with the desired UI layout and does not unintentionally affect the component's appearance.
Line range hint
179-194: Event Handling for 'Text Options' TogglesThe
toggle-switch-inputcomponents formulti_linesandsecret_inputinclude@update:model-valueevent listeners (onFieldMultiLinesChangeandonFieldSecretInputChange). Ensure these methods are defined and handle the state updates correctly since the original methods may have been modified or removed.Apply this diff to include missing methods if they are not already defined:
methods: { + onFieldMultiLinesChange(val) { + this.field.multi_lines = val; + if (this.field.multi_lines) { + this.field.secret_input = false; + } + }, + onFieldSecretInputChange(val) { + this.field.secret_input = val; + if (this.field.secret_input) { + this.field.multi_lines = false; + } + }, // ... other methods ... }
303-307: Potential Overlap of Icons in 'Customization' HeaderThe icon
i-heroicons-adjustments-horizontalis also used in another section. Consider using a different icon to represent the 'Customization' section uniquely to avoid confusion.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (53)
- api/app/Models/Forms/Form.php (0 hunks)
- api/app/Service/SeoMetaResolver.php (0 hunks)
- api/database/migrations/2024_09_23_054851_add_description_to_form_properties.php (1 hunks)
- api/tests/Feature/Forms/FormTest.php (2 hunks)
- api/tests/Unit/TestHelpersTest.php (0 hunks)
- client/app.config.ts (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/ColorInput.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/forms/FlatSelectInput.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/forms/SignatureInput.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (4 hunks)
- client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSection.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSubSection.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/global/Settings/SettingsWrapper.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/editors/EditorRightSidebar.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/editors/UndoRedo.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue (13 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (7 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/BlockTypeIcon.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/CustomFieldValidation.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (6 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormFieldsEditor.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/EditorSectionHeader.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormAboutSubmission.vue (0 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormAccess.vue (0 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomCode.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomSeo.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (6 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorSidebar.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSecurityAccess.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSecurityPrivacy.vue (0 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSettings.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSubmissionSettings.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (3 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (11 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/HiddenRequiredDisabled.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/MatrixFieldOptions.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/pages/forms/show/FormCleanings.vue (1 hunks)
- client/composables/forms/initForm.js (2 hunks)
- client/data/blocks_types.json (1 hunks)
- client/nuxt.config.ts (2 hunks)
- client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue (1 hunks)
- client/pages/forms/create/index.vue (1 hunks)
- client/stores/working_form.js (4 hunks)
- client/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (6)
- api/app/Models/Forms/Form.php
- api/app/Service/SeoMetaResolver.php
- api/tests/Unit/TestHelpersTest.php
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormAboutSubmission.vue
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormAccess.vue
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSecurityPrivacy.vue
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- client/pages/forms/create/index.vue
Additional comments not posted (135)
client/app.config.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM: Proper comma usageThe addition of the comma after the 'gray' property is correct. This change ensures proper syntax for object literals and allows for easy addition of new properties.
client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSubSection.vue (1)
1-30: Great job on this new component!The
SettingsSubSectioncomponent is well-designed, utilizing Vue 3 and Composition API effectively. It provides a reusable structure for settings sections with a clean, responsive layout. The use of props for title and description, along with a flexible slot for content, makes this component versatile and easy to use across the application.The minor suggestions for accessibility and prop validation are enhancements that can be considered for future iterations, but they don't detract from the overall quality of this implementation.
client/components/open/forms/components/BlockTypeIcon.vue (2)
13-15: LGTM! Effective use of Composition API and external data.The script section is well-structured, using the Composition API effectively. The import of external data from a JSON file is a good practice for managing configuration data.
1-11: LGTM! Clean and well-structured template.The template follows Vue.js best practices with proper use of dynamic class binding and component composition.
Could you please clarify the origin of the
Iconcomponent? Let's verify its import:client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/EditorSectionHeader.vue (1)
1-39: Overall, well-implemented reusable UI componentThis
EditorSectionHeadercomponent is well-structured and follows Vue 3 best practices. It effectively uses the Composition API with<script setup>and provides a flexible layout that adapts based on theshowLineprop.Key strengths:
- Clear and concise prop definitions
- Effective use of conditional rendering and dynamic class binding
- Separation of concerns between template and script
The minor suggestions provided earlier (improving accessibility and adding prop validation) will further enhance the component's robustness and usability.
Great job on creating this reusable UI component!
client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSection.vue (4)
1-11: LGTM: Well-structured templateThe template is well-structured and follows Vue.js best practices:
- Proper use of
v-showdirective for conditional rendering- Clear header with the section name
- Flexible content insertion using
<slot>
13-14: LGTM: Proper import and setupThe script section correctly uses the
<script setup>syntax and imports the necessary functions from Vue.
16-25: LGTM: Well-defined propsProps are correctly defined with proper types and required flags.
31-39: LGTM: Proper lifecycle managementThe component correctly uses
onMountedandonBeforeUnmounthooks to register and unregister the section. TheisActivecomputed property is also well-implemented.client/components/open/editors/EditorRightSidebar.vue (3)
6-7: LGTM: Improved flexibility for sidebar width stylingThe addition of the
:class="widthClass"binding enhances the component's flexibility by allowing dynamic control of the sidebar's width through props. This change is well-implemented and maintains existing styles while adding customization options.
15-16: Minor style changes in import statementsThe change from double quotes to single quotes in the import statements is a minor style adjustment, likely to conform with project linting rules or style guidelines. This change doesn't affect functionality.
Line range hint
1-43: Summary: Improved flexibility for EditorRightSidebar componentThe changes to this component enhance its flexibility by introducing a customizable width through the new
widthClassprop. This aligns well with the PR objectives for improving the form editor. The implementation is clean, maintains existing functionality, and follows Vue.js best practices.Key improvements:
- Dynamic sidebar width control through props
- Maintained existing styles while adding customization options
- Minor style consistency updates in import statements
These changes contribute positively to the overall form editor enhancements described in the PR objectives.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSettings.vue (1)
17-24: LGTM! Good use of Composition API and modular structure.The script section is well-organized, properly importing dependencies and child components. The use of the Composition API with the
setup()function is a modern and efficient approach in Vue.client/components/open/editors/UndoRedo.vue (3)
5-5: LGTM: Consistent styling changeThe addition of the
shadow-noneclass to the UButtonGroup is consistent with the overall styling changes in this component. This modification removes any shadow effect from the button group, creating a flatter design.
16-16: LGTM: Consistent button stylingThe addition of the
shadow-noneclass to the Undo button is consistent with the overall styling changes. Thedisabled:text-gray-500class is retained, ensuring that the disabled state is still visually distinct.
29-29: LGTM: Consistent button stylingThe addition of the
shadow-noneclass to the Redo button maintains consistency with the Undo button and overall component styling. Thedisabled:text-gray-500class is retained, preserving the visual distinction for the disabled state.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomCode.vue (1)
23-31: LGTM! Improved user guidance.The updates to the help text and placeholder for the code-input component provide more specific and helpful guidance to the user. The concrete example in the placeholder is particularly useful.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorSidebar.vue (1)
3-3: LGTM! Responsive sidebar width adjustment.This change dynamically adjusts the sidebar width based on the
showAddFieldSidebarstate. It's a good UI/UX improvement, making the sidebar narrower (15rem) when the add field option is active, and wider (20rem) otherwise. The implementation is concise and effective.client/components/global/Settings/SettingsWrapper.vue (2)
30-35: LGTM! Proper use of Composition API.The script setup section correctly uses the Composition API, importing necessary functions and creating appropriate reactive references for managing sections and the active section.
1-62: Great job on implementing the SettingsWrapper component!This component is well-structured, utilizing Vue.js best practices and the Composition API effectively. It provides a flexible and dynamic settings layout with a sidebar and main content area. The implementation of section registration and management is robust, with only minor suggestions for improvement in accessibility and edge case handling.
The component's design allows for easy extension and maintenance, making it a valuable addition to the project's UI framework.
client/components/open/forms/components/CustomFieldValidation.vue (5)
2-5: Improved structure and user guidanceThe changes simplify the component structure by replacing the
<collapse>with a<div>, making it more straightforward. The added explanatory text provides valuable context to the user about the custom validation feature and its usage.
9-10: Enhanced clarity in label textThe updated label "Validation criteria for field acceptance" is more precise and professional. This change improves the user's understanding of the purpose of this section.
21-22: Improved user guidance for error messagesThe changes in this section enhance user understanding:
- The simplified label "Error message" is more concise.
- The added help text "Displayed when the validation fails" provides important context about when the error message will be shown.
These modifications improve the overall user experience by making the purpose of the input clearer.
25-25: Structural adjustmentThe repositioning of the closing
</div>tag is a necessary adjustment following the removal of the<collapse>component. This change ensures proper nesting of elements and maintains the correct structure of the template.
Line range hint
1-85: Overall improvement in user interface and experienceThe changes in this file focus on enhancing the user interface and experience of the custom field validation component. Key improvements include:
- Simplified structure by removing the
<collapse>component.- Added explanatory text to guide users on custom validation usage.
- Updated labels and help text for better clarity and context.
These modifications align well with the provided summary and contribute to a more user-friendly and intuitive form editor. The component's core functionality remains unchanged, with improvements centered on how information is presented to the user.
client/nuxt.config.ts (1)
84-84: LGTM: Improved array formattingThe change to the 'icons' array is a good formatting improvement. It's more concise and aligns with modern JavaScript syntax.
client/components/global/EditableTag.vue (3)
2-3: Excellent improvement in component flexibility!The replacement of the static
<div>with a dynamic<component>using the:isdirective is a great enhancement. This change allows the component to render different HTML elements based on theelementprop, making it more versatile and reusable across different contexts.
24-24: Great styling improvements!The addition of rounded corners (
rounded-md) and padding (px-2) enhances the visual appeal and usability of the component in editing mode. These changes align well with modern UI practices and improve the overall user experience.Also applies to: 30-30
37-37: Correct closing tag for dynamic componentThe change from
</div>to</component>is correct and consistent with the earlier modification to use a dynamic component.client/tailwind.config.js (1)
14-14: Approved, but clarification needed on JSON file inclusionThe addition of
'./data/**/*.json'to thecontentarray allows Tailwind to scan JSON files in the data directory. This change is likely intentional for the form editor v2, but I have a few points to consider:
Could you clarify the specific purpose of including JSON files in the Tailwind content config? It's an uncommon practice and understanding the use case would be helpful.
Be aware that this change might increase build time if there are many or large JSON files in the data directory. Consider monitoring the build performance to ensure it doesn't negatively impact development experience.
Ensure that the JSON files don't contain strings that unintentionally match Tailwind class names, as this could lead to unexpected CSS generation.
To help assess the potential impact, let's check the JSON files in the data directory:
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormSecurityAccess.vue (4)
1-5: LGTM: Component structure looks goodThe component is properly wrapped in a
SettingsSectionwith appropriate name and icon. This provides a clear and consistent UI for the security and access settings.
21-29: LGTM: Date input implementationThe date input for the closing date is well-implemented with appropriate props and help text.
54-66: LGTM: Conditional rendering for max submissions reached textThe conditional rendering and input for the max submissions reached text is implemented correctly.
1-100: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with room for minor improvementsThe
FormSecurityAccesscomponent is well-structured and implements the required functionality for managing form security and access settings. It effectively uses conditional rendering and various input components to provide a comprehensive interface for users.Key strengths:
- Clear organization of settings into "Access" and "Security" sections.
- Appropriate use of input components for different types of settings.
- Conditional rendering for optional settings.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Enhance password input with strength validation.
- Add a preview feature for the closed form text.
- Implement client-side validation for the max submissions count.
- Provide more detailed information about the CAPTCHA feature.
- Refactor the script section to use Vue 3's Composition API features and improve type safety.
These improvements would further enhance the user experience and maintainability of the component. Overall, the component is well-implemented and ready for use with minor enhancements.
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/MatrixFieldOptions.vue (1)
73-73: LGTM! Proper import of the new component.The import statement for
EditorSectionHeaderis correctly added and follows the project's import conventions.client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (1)
3-12: Improved header structure and icon usageThe changes to the header structure and the use of the
Iconcomponent instead of an inline SVG are good improvements. This approach enhances code readability and maintainability by centralizing icon management.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/BlockOptions.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-144: Overall improvement in component structure and functionalityThe changes made to the
BlockOptions.vuecomponent significantly enhance its structure, functionality, and user experience. Key improvements include:
- Restructured template with better organization and conditional rendering.
- Introduction of the
HiddenRequiredDisabledcomponent for improved code reusability.- Transition to
<script setup>syntax for cleaner and more concise script logic.- Enhanced layout using a grid system for better visual organization.
The suggested optimizations, if implemented, will further improve the component's efficiency and maintainability. These changes align well with modern Vue.js best practices and contribute to a more robust form editor system.
client/components/pages/forms/show/FormCleanings.vue (1)
5-5: LGTM: Dark mode support addedThe addition of
dark:bg-blue-950to the class string is a good improvement. This change adds dark mode support for the background color of the section, which enhances the user experience for users who prefer dark themes.client/components/open/forms/fields/components/HiddenRequiredDisabled.vue (1)
1-116: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with room for enhancementsThis new
HiddenRequiredDisabled.vuecomponent is well-structured and follows Vue.js best practices. It effectively manages the "Required," "Hidden," and "Disabled" options for form fields. The component uses reactive state management and computed properties to handle user interactions and dynamic rendering.Key strengths:
- Clear separation of template and script logic.
- Use of Vue 3 Composition API with
<script setup>.- Responsive and accessible UI design.
Suggested improvements:
- Enhance template structure by extracting repeated logic into computed properties.
- Improve accessibility with ARIA attributes.
- Add TypeScript for better type safety.
- Simplify the
toggleOptionfunction for better readability.- Consider performance optimizations like
v-memofor list rendering scenarios.Implementing these suggestions will further improve the component's maintainability, type safety, and performance.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomSeo.vue (5)
2-5: Improved component structure with SettingsSectionThe use of
SettingsSectioncomponent improves the overall structure and consistency of the form editor. The icon change to "i-heroicons-link" aligns with modern icon usage practices.
28-59: Conditional rendering of SEO meta fieldsThe use of
v-if="form.seo_meta"ensures that the SEO meta fields are only rendered when the necessary data is available. This is a good practice to prevent errors.The layout improvements, such as using a flex container for image inputs, enhance the visual organization of the form.
61-73: New Link Privacy sectionThe addition of the Link Privacy section with a toggle for Google indexing is a valuable feature for users who want to control their form's visibility in search results.
78-90: Updated imports and setup functionThe addition of the ProTag component import and its registration in the components object is correct and aligns with its usage in the template.
The use of the composition API with
setup()andstoreToRefsis a good practice for better type inference and reactivity.
Line range hint
1-122: Overall improvements to SEO settings interfaceThe changes to FormCustomSeo.vue significantly enhance the organization, clarity, and functionality of the SEO settings interface. The introduction of new components like SettingsSection and ProTag, along with the addition of the Link Privacy feature, provides users with a more comprehensive and user-friendly SEO management experience.
The code structure improvements, including the use of the composition API and proper initialization of the seo_meta object, contribute to better maintainability and reliability of the component.
While the changes are generally very good, consider the minor suggestions provided in the previous comments to further refine the component.
client/components/forms/SignatureInput.vue (1)
44-44: Approve the addition of "not-draggable" class, but verify its impact.The addition of the "not-draggable" class to the VueSignaturePad component is a good way to prevent unintended drag operations. This can improve user experience and potentially accessibility.
To ensure consistency and verify the impact, please run the following checks:
Please review the results to ensure:
- If there are other instances of VueSignaturePad, consider applying the same class for consistency.
- If "not-draggable" is used elsewhere, ensure it's applied consistently.
- Confirm that this change doesn't unintentionally interfere with any existing drag functionality in the component.
Verification successful
Verified the addition of the "not-draggable" class.
The
not-draggableclass has been successfully added to theVueSignaturePadcomponent withinSignatureInput.vue. No other instances ofVueSignaturePador thenot-draggableclass were found elsewhere in the codebase, and there are no additional drag-related functionalities impacted by this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad and the usage of "not-draggable" class # Test 1: Check for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad echo "Checking for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad:" rg --type vue "VueSignaturePad" # Test 2: Check for other occurrences of "not-draggable" class echo "\nChecking for other occurrences of 'not-draggable' class:" rg --type vue "class=\"[^\"]*not-draggable" # Test 3: Check if there's any drag-related functionality in the component echo "\nChecking for drag-related functionality in SignatureInput.vue:" rg --type vue "drag|drop" client/components/forms/SignatureInput.vueLength of output: 613
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad and the usage of "not-draggable" class # Test 1: Check for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad echo "Checking for other occurrences of VueSignaturePad:" rg -g "*.vue" "VueSignaturePad" # Test 2: Check for other occurrences of "not-draggable" class echo "\nChecking for other occurrences of 'not-draggable' class:" rg -g "*.vue" 'class="[^"]*not-draggable' # Test 3: Check if there's any drag-related functionality in the component echo "\nChecking for drag-related functionality in SignatureInput.vue:" rg "drag|drop" client/components/forms/SignatureInput.vueLength of output: 868
client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditorNavbar.vue (12)
1-2: LGTM: Component structure looks goodThe overall structure of the component is well-organized, using a flex layout for proper alignment of elements.
16-20: LGTM: Editable title implementationThe editable title using the
EditableTagcomponent is a good approach for inline editing.
22-33: LGTM: Visibility badgesThe visibility badges are implemented correctly using conditional rendering.
35-35: LGTM: UndoRedo componentThe
UndoRedocomponent is properly included in the template.
37-46: LGTM: Tabs implementationThe tabs are implemented using the
UTabscomponent, which is a good practice for creating a tabbed interface.
69-109: LGTM: Save button implementationThe save button implementation looks good, with proper loading state, tracking, and conditional text based on form visibility.
114-120: LGTM: Imports and setupThe imports and setup look good, using the Composition API effectively.
121-134: LGTM: Props definitionThe props are well-defined with appropriate types and default values.
136-136: LGTM: Emits definitionThe emits are properly defined for the component.
138-143: LGTM: Keyboard shortcut implementationThe keyboard shortcut for saving the form is implemented correctly using the
defineShortcutsfunction.
145-149: LGTM: Store and state managementThe use of
useWorkingFormStoreandstoreToRefsfor state management is appropriate.
1-150: Overall, excellent implementation of the FormEditorNavbar componentThe component is well-structured, follows Vue 3 best practices, and effectively uses the Composition API. It provides a comprehensive navigation bar for the form editor with all necessary functionalities. The minor suggestions for improving accessibility will enhance the user experience.
client/data/blocks_types.json (1)
1-164: LGTM: Well-structured and consistent JSON formatThe overall structure of the JSON file is well-formed and consistent. Each block type follows the same structure with six properties: name, title, icon, default_block_name, bg_class, and text_class. The file is properly formatted with consistent indentation, making it easy to read and maintain.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormInformation.vue (6)
2-8: Improved structure with SettingsSection componentThe replacement of
editor-options-panelwithSettingsSectionenhances the organization and presentation of the form information. The addition of an icon and a descriptive paragraph improves user understanding of this section's purpose.
11-15: Enhanced input fields for better user experienceThe changes to input fields improve clarity and usability:
- The form title input now uses a more descriptive label "Form Name" with an appropriate placeholder.
- The tags input now includes a
clearableproperty, allowing users to easily remove all selected tags.- The visibility input has been changed to a
flat-select-inputwith a clearer label "Form Visibility".These modifications enhance the user interface and make the form more intuitive to use.
Also applies to: 20-24, 29-35
51-59: Updated copy settings buttonThe button for copying form settings has been updated to use
UButtoninstead ofv-button, with changes to its color and icon. This change likely aligns the button style with updated design guidelines.
62-112: Refined copy settings modalThe modal for copying settings has been retained but has undergone minor adjustments in structure and styling. Notable changes include:
- Addition of a title template for better clarity.
- Removal of redundant SVG elements, improving code cleanliness.
- Improved structure of the modal content.
These changes enhance the user experience when copying settings from another form.
Line range hint
115-231: Script section consistencyThe script section remains largely unchanged and appears to be consistent with the modifications made in the template. The data properties, computed properties, and methods align with the updated template structure and functionality.
Line range hint
1-231: Overall assessment: Improved form information componentThe changes made to FormInformation.vue significantly enhance the user interface and experience of the form editor. Key improvements include:
- Better organization of form settings using the SettingsSection component.
- Enhanced input fields for clearer user interaction.
- New conditional rendering for closed form text, providing context-specific options.
- Refined copy settings functionality with improved button and modal presentation.
These changes align well with modern UI/UX practices and should result in a more intuitive and efficient form editing experience for users.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (4)
3-7: Improved UI organization with EditorSectionHeaderThe addition of the EditorSectionHeader component for "Basic Appearance" enhances the organization and readability of the form customization interface. The use of appropriate icons (paint brush for appearance) provides visual cues to users, improving the overall user experience.
37-40: Improved organization with additional section headersThe introduction of EditorSectionHeader components for "Typography" and "Layout & Sizing" further enhances the organization and clarity of the form customization interface. The use of appropriate icons (typography and rectangle stack) provides clear visual cues for each section's purpose.
Also applies to: 66-69
180-180: Correct import for new EditorSectionHeader componentThe addition of the import statement for EditorSectionHeader correctly corresponds to its usage in the template section. This ensures that the new component is properly available for use in the file.
Line range hint
1-180: Overall improvement in form customization UI and functionalityThe changes in this file significantly enhance the form customization interface. The introduction of section headers, new customization options, and improved labeling create a more organized, intuitive, and feature-rich user experience. The additions cater to various aspects of form design, from basic appearance to advanced options, providing users with granular control over their form's look and feel.
These improvements will likely lead to a more satisfying user experience and potentially more aesthetically pleasing and functional forms. Great job on this update!
api/tests/Feature/Forms/FormTest.php (2)
68-69: LGTM! Verify removal of 'description' field throughout the codebase.The removal of the 'description' field assertion is consistent with the reported changes to the
Formmodel. This change appears to be intentional and aligns with the broader modifications in the codebase.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to verify the removal of the 'description' field throughout the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of 'description' field from Form model and related code # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to 'description' in Form model echo "Checking Form model for 'description' field:" rg --type php 'description' app/Models/Form.php # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to 'description' in form-related tests echo "Checking form-related tests for 'description' field:" rg --type php 'description' api/tests/Feature/Forms # Test 3: Check for any remaining references to 'description' in form-related controllers echo "Checking form-related controllers for 'description' field:" rg --type php 'description' app/Http/Controllers/FormController.php # Test 4: Check for any remaining references to 'description' in form-related resources echo "Checking form-related resources for 'description' field:" rg --type php 'description' app/Http/Resources/FormResource.phpThis script will help identify any remaining references to the 'description' field that may need to be addressed.
127-128: LGTM! Verify form duplication logic.The changes to this assertion are consistent with the removal of the 'description' field and introduce a new check for the 'Copy of ' prefix in duplicated form titles. This change appears to be intentional and provides a clear way to distinguish duplicated forms.
To ensure the form duplication logic is working as expected, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the form duplication logic is correctly implemented, including the addition of the 'Copy of ' prefix to duplicated form titles.
Verification successful
Form duplication logic verified successfully.
The duplication process correctly implements the 'Copy of ' prefix in the form titles within the
duplicatefunction inFormController.php. This ensures that duplicated forms are easily distinguishable.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify form duplication logic # Test 1: Check for the implementation of the 'Copy of ' prefix in the form duplication logic echo "Checking form duplication logic for 'Copy of ' prefix:" rg --type php "'Copy of '" app/Http/Controllers/FormController.php # Test 2: Verify that the form duplication method exists and is properly implemented echo "Checking for form duplication method:" ast-grep --lang php --pattern $'function duplicate($$$) { $$$ $$$ = "Copy of " . $$$; $$$ }'Length of output: 1141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify form duplication logic across the entire codebase # Test 1: Search for the 'Copy of ' prefix in all PHP files echo "Searching for 'Copy of ' prefix in form titles across all PHP files:" rg --type php "'Copy of '" # Test 2: Find all implementations of the 'duplicate' function in PHP files echo "Searching for 'duplicate' function definitions across all PHP files:" ast-grep --lang php "function duplicate($$)"Length of output: 686
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify form duplication logic across the entire codebase with corrected ast-grep usage # Test 1: Search for the 'Copy of ' prefix in all PHP files echo "Searching for 'Copy of ' prefix in form titles across all PHP files:" rg --type php "'Copy of '" # Test 2: Find all implementations of the 'duplicate' function in PHP files using corrected ast-grep syntax echo "Searching for 'duplicate' function definitions across all PHP files:" ast-grep "function duplicate" --lang phpLength of output: 689
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the 'duplicate' function using ripgrep # Test 1: Search for the 'duplicate' function definition in all PHP files echo "Searching for 'duplicate' function definitions across all PHP files:" rg --type php "function\s+duplicate\s*\("Length of output: 281
client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (5)
7-7: Improved user guidanceThe updated instructional text provides clearer, step-by-step guidance for users. This change enhances the user experience by breaking down the process into more digestible steps: selecting a field, adding conditions, and then adding actions.
16-19: Improved code formattingThe Icon component for the "Copy from" button has been reformatted for better readability. Each attribute is now on a separate line, which is a good practice for maintaining clean and easily scannable code.
31-35: Improved button formatting and text
- The Icon component for the "Clear" button has been reformatted consistently with the previous icon change, improving code readability.
- The button text has been shortened from "Clear All" to "Clear", making the UI more concise without losing meaning. This change is appropriate as the icon already suggests a clear action.
Both changes contribute to a cleaner and more consistent user interface.
Line range hint
1-1: Clarify the removal of the "Logic" headerThe AI summary mentions that an
<h3>element with the text "Logic" has been removed, but this change is not visible in the provided code diff. Could you please clarify:
- Was this header removed in a previous commit?
- How does its removal impact the overall structure and clarity of the form?
- Are there any surrounding elements or context that compensate for the removed header?
This information will help assess whether additional changes are needed to maintain clear section demarcation within the form.
Line range hint
1-278: Overall assessment: Improved UI and code readabilityThe changes in this file focus on enhancing the user interface and improving code readability:
- The instructional text has been updated to provide clearer guidance.
- Button text has been made more concise.
- Icon component formatting has been standardized for better code readability.
These updates align well with the PR objective of updating the form editor. The changes are UI-focused and don't introduce any apparent functional modifications or potential issues.
One point to clarify is the removal of the "Logic" header, as mentioned in a previous comment.
Overall, these changes contribute positively to the user experience and code maintainability.
client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue (1)
222-225: Verify consistent usage ofpage_descriptionpropertyThe change from
descriptiontopage_descriptionin thepageMetaobject suggests a possible renaming of this property. To ensure consistency and prevent potential bugs:
- Verify that this change is reflected in all relevant parts of the codebase where
pageMetais used.- Check if there are any other occurrences of
pageMeta.value.descriptionthat need to be updated topageMeta.value.page_description.Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
pageMeta.value.description:This will help identify any places where the old property name is still being used, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Verification successful
| tabs: { | ||
| wrapper:'space-y-0', | ||
| list: { | ||
| height: 'h-auto', | ||
| tab: { | ||
| height: 'h-[30px]' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good addition of tab styling, but consider flexibility
The addition of the tabs object with its nested properties is a good enhancement to the UI configuration. It provides a clear structure for customizing tab styles.
However, I have a suggestion regarding the tab height:
Consider using a more flexible approach for the tab height. The current fixed height of 'h-[30px]' might cause issues with responsiveness or accessibility. You could:
- Use a relative unit like
remoreminstead of pixels. - Use min-height instead of a fixed height.
- Allow for dynamic height based on content.
Here's an example of how you might adjust this:
tabs: {
wrapper:'space-y-0',
list: {
height: 'h-auto',
tab: {
- height: 'h-[30px]'
+ height: 'min-h-[2rem]'
}
}
}This change would maintain a minimum height while allowing the tab to grow if needed.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| tabs: { | |
| wrapper:'space-y-0', | |
| list: { | |
| height: 'h-auto', | |
| tab: { | |
| height: 'h-[30px]' | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| tabs: { | |
| wrapper:'space-y-0', | |
| list: { | |
| height: 'h-auto', | |
| tab: { | |
| height: 'min-h-[2rem]' | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| <template> | ||
| <div | ||
| class="p-1 rounded-md flex items-center justify-center" | ||
| :class="[bgClass, textClass]" | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon | ||
| :name="icon" | ||
| class="h-4 w-4" | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </template> | ||
|
|
||
| <script setup> | ||
| import blocksTypes from '~/data/blocks_types.json' | ||
|
|
||
| const props = defineProps({ | ||
| type: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| const bgClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.bg_class || '') | ||
| const textClass = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.text_class || '') | ||
| const icon = computed(() => blocksTypes[props.type]?.icon || '') | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well-designed, reusable component with room for minor improvement.
This BlockTypeIcon component is well-structured, following Vue.js best practices and utilizing the Composition API effectively. Its design allows for flexibility in displaying different block type icons with dynamic styling.
To further improve maintainability, consider the following suggestion:
Add a comment explaining the structure of the blocksTypes JSON file. This will help future developers understand the expected format of the configuration data. For example:
// Add this comment above the import statement
// blocksTypes.json structure:
// {
// "type1": { "bg_class": "...", "text_class": "...", "icon": "..." },
// "type2": { "bg_class": "...", "text_class": "...", "icon": "..." },
// ...
// }
import blocksTypes from '~/data/blocks_types.json'This addition will enhance the component's self-documentation and make it easier for other developers to work with or extend in the future.
| <template> | ||
| <div class="relative"> | ||
| <hr | ||
| v-if="showLine" | ||
| class="border-t border-gray-200 mb-6 mt-8 -mx-4" | ||
| > | ||
| <div | ||
| :class="[ | ||
| 'flex gap-x-2 items-center', | ||
| showLine ? 'mb-2 px-2 -mx-2 absolute -top-[10px] bg-white' : 'my-4' | ||
| ]" | ||
| > | ||
| <Icon | ||
| :name="icon" | ||
| class="w-4 h-4 text-gray-400" | ||
| /> | ||
| <h3 class="text-sm font-semibold text-gray-500"> | ||
| {{ title }} | ||
| </h3> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </template> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider potential layout issues and improve accessibility
The template structure looks good overall, but there are a few points to consider:
-
The use of negative margins (-mx-4 and -mx-2) might affect the component's integration with its parent. Ensure that this doesn't cause unexpected layout issues in different contexts.
-
The absolute positioning of the header when
showLineis true could potentially cause layout issues if not handled carefully in the parent component. Make sure there's enough space in the parent to accommodate this positioning. -
For improved accessibility, consider adding an
aria-hidden="true"attribute to the Icon component, as it's likely decorative and not essential for screen readers.
Consider applying this change to improve accessibility:
<Icon
:name="icon"
class="w-4 h-4 text-gray-400"
+ aria-hidden="true"
/>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <template> | |
| <div class="relative"> | |
| <hr | |
| v-if="showLine" | |
| class="border-t border-gray-200 mb-6 mt-8 -mx-4" | |
| > | |
| <div | |
| :class="[ | |
| 'flex gap-x-2 items-center', | |
| showLine ? 'mb-2 px-2 -mx-2 absolute -top-[10px] bg-white' : 'my-4' | |
| ]" | |
| > | |
| <Icon | |
| :name="icon" | |
| class="w-4 h-4 text-gray-400" | |
| /> | |
| <h3 class="text-sm font-semibold text-gray-500"> | |
| {{ title }} | |
| </h3> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </template> | |
| <template> | |
| <div class="relative"> | |
| <hr | |
| v-if="showLine" | |
| class="border-t border-gray-200 mb-6 mt-8 -mx-4" | |
| > | |
| <div | |
| :class="[ | |
| 'flex gap-x-2 items-center', | |
| showLine ? 'mb-2 px-2 -mx-2 absolute -top-[10px] bg-white' : 'my-4' | |
| ]" | |
| > | |
| <Icon | |
| :name="icon" | |
| class="w-4 h-4 text-gray-400" | |
| aria-hidden="true" | |
| /> | |
| <h3 class="text-sm font-semibold text-gray-500"> | |
| {{ title }} | |
| </h3> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| </template> |
| <template> | ||
| <div | ||
| v-show="isActive" | ||
| class="settings-section" | ||
| > | ||
| <h3 class="text-xl font-semibold mb-1"> | ||
| {{ name }} | ||
| </h3> | ||
| <slot /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </template> | ||
|
|
||
| <script setup> | ||
| import { inject, computed, onMounted, onBeforeUnmount } from 'vue' | ||
|
|
||
| const props = defineProps({ | ||
| name: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true | ||
| }, | ||
| icon: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| const activeSection = inject('activeSection', ref('')) | ||
| const registerSection = inject('registerSection', () => {}) | ||
| const unregisterSection = inject('unregisterSection', () => {}) | ||
|
|
||
| const isActive = computed(() => activeSection.value === props.name) | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { | ||
| registerSection(props.name, props.icon) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| onBeforeUnmount(() => { | ||
| unregisterSection(props.name) | ||
| }) | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well-implemented component with room for documentation improvement
Overall, this is a well-implemented Vue component using the Composition API. It's designed to be part of a larger settings system, with proper lifecycle management for registration and unregistration of sections.
Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file explaining the purpose of this component and how it fits into the larger settings system. This would improve maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand the component's role. For example:
<!--
SettingsSection.vue
This component represents a section in the settings interface.
It's designed to work with a parent component that manages active sections
and provides registration/unregistration functionality.
-->| setup() { | ||
| const workingFormStore = useWorkingFormStore() | ||
| return { | ||
| form: storeToRefs(workingFormStore).content | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix missing import for storeToRefs.
The storeToRefs function is used in the setup() function, but it's not imported. This will cause a runtime error.
Add the following import at the top of the script section:
+ import { storeToRefs } from 'pinia'Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| class="px-4" | ||
| > | ||
| <h3 class="font-semibold block text-lg"> | ||
| Scale | ||
| </h3> | ||
| <p class="text-gray-400 mb-3 text-xs"> | ||
| Advanced options for scale. | ||
| </p> | ||
| <EditorSectionHeader | ||
| icon="i-heroicons-scale-20-solid" | ||
| title="Scale" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate Number Input Constraints for 'Scale' Field
In the 'Scale' field options:
- Confirm that the
:minand:maxattributes ontext-inputcomponents enforce the desired numerical constraints. - Ensure that the
scale_min_value,scale_max_value, andscale_step_valueare validated to prevent logical errors (e.g.,scale_min_valueshould be less thanscale_max_value).
| class="px-4" | ||
| > | ||
| <h3 class="font-semibold block text-lg"> | ||
| Slider | ||
| </h3> | ||
| <p class="text-gray-400 mb-3 text-xs"> | ||
| Advanced options for slider. | ||
| </p> | ||
| <EditorSectionHeader | ||
| icon="i-heroicons-adjustments-horizontal" | ||
| title="Slider" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Slider Field Value Validation
For the 'Slider' field options:
- Check that
slider_min_value,slider_max_value, andslider_step_valuehave appropriate validation. - Ensure that
slider_min_valueis less thanslider_max_valueand thatslider_step_valuedivides evenly into the range.
| const urlPrefill = this.isPublicFormPage ? new URLSearchParams(window.location.search) : null | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential server-side rendering issue with window.location.search.
Accessing window in initFormWithDefaultValues() can cause errors during server-side rendering. To prevent this, ensure the code executes only on the client-side.
Apply this diff to safely access window.location.search:
- const urlPrefill = this.isPublicFormPage ? new URLSearchParams(window.location.search) : null
+ const urlPrefill = this.isPublicFormPage && import.meta.client ? new URLSearchParams(window.location.search) : nullCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const urlPrefill = this.isPublicFormPage ? new URLSearchParams(window.location.search) : null | |
| const urlPrefill = this.isPublicFormPage && import.meta.client ? new URLSearchParams(window.location.search) : null |
| console.error(error) | ||
| if (error?.data?.message) { | ||
| useAlert().error(error.data.message) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing import for useAlert() function.
The useAlert() function is used in handleValidationError() but not imported, which will cause a ReferenceError.
Apply this diff to import useAlert():
+import { useAlert } from '~/composables/alert.js'Replace '~/composables/alert.js' with the correct path to your useAlert composable.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const submissionId = useRoute().query?.submission_id | ||
| if (submissionId) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing import for useRoute() function.
The useRoute() function is used but not imported, which will lead to a ReferenceError.
Apply this diff to import useRoute from 'vue-router':
+import { useRoute } from 'vue-router'Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (3)
10-11: LGTM: Enhanced visual feedback and interactionThe updates to the class bindings improve the visual feedback for admin preview mode and enhance user interaction. The cursor change when the edit field sidebar is shown is a good UX improvement.
Consider extracting the long class string on line 10 into a computed property for better readability and maintainability. For example:
computed: { adminPreviewClasses() { return 'group/nffield hover:bg-gray-100/50 relative hover:z-10 transition-colors hover:border-gray-200 dark:hover:!bg-gray-900 border-dashed border border-transparent box-border dark:hover:border-blue-900 rounded-md' } }Then use it in the template like this:
:class="[ getFieldWidthClasses(field), { [adminPreviewClasses]: adminPreview, 'cursor-pointer': workingFormStore.showEditFieldSidebar && adminPreview, 'bg-blue-50 hover:!bg-blue-50 dark:bg-gray-800 rounded-md': beingEdited, } ]"Also applies to: 14-14
Line range hint
22-56: LGTM: Improved admin controls layout and functionalityThe updates to the admin preview buttons enhance both the layout and functionality of the admin controls. The addition of a remove field button is a valuable feature for form editing.
Consider adding aria-labels to the buttons to improve accessibility. For example:
<div class="p-1 pt-0 hover:text-blue-500 cursor-pointer text-gray-400 dark:text-gray-500 dark:border-gray-500" role="button" aria-label="Add field" @click.prevent="openAddFieldSidebar" > <Icon name="heroicons:plus-16-solid" class="w-6 h-6" /> </div>Apply similar aria-labels to the other buttons as well.
285-288: LGTM: Addition of removeField methodThe addition of the
removeFieldmethod is a valuable enhancement to the editing capabilities. The check foradminPreviewensures it only executes in the appropriate context, which is a good practice.Consider adding a confirmation dialog before removing a field to prevent accidental deletions. You could implement this using a simple JavaScript confirm dialog or a more sophisticated modal component. For example:
removeField() { if (!this.adminPreview) return if (confirm('Are you sure you want to remove this field?')) { this.workingFormStore.removeField(this.field) } }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (6 hunks)
- client/stores/working_form.js (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
client/stores/working_form.js (5)
4-4: LGTM: Improved maintainability with external block typesThe introduction of
blocksTypesimport from a JSON file is a good practice. It centralizes block type definitions, making it easier to maintain and update block types without modifying the store code directly.
10-11: Please provide context for new state propertiesThe addition of
activeTabandformPageIndexto the state suggests new UI features for form navigation or tab management. Could you please provide more context on how these properties are used in the application? This information would help ensure that they are properly integrated and utilized across the codebase.
35-37: LGTM: Streamlined field editingThe
setEditingFieldmethod is a good addition that streamlines the process of setting the currently edited field. It correctly utilizes theobjectToIndexmethod for consistency.
48-50: LGTM: Improved consistency in field editingThe update to
openAddFieldSidebarmethod improves consistency by utilizing the newsetEditingFieldmethod. The conditional check ensures thatsetEditingFieldis only called when a field is provided, which is a good practice.
Line range hint
1-160: Summary of review for working_form.jsOverall, the changes to the working form store improve its functionality and structure. Key improvements include:
- Externalization of block types data
- Addition of new methods for field management
- Implementation of remove field functionality with undo option
However, there are a few areas that need attention:
- Adding null checks in the
objectToIndexmethod- Providing context for new state properties (
activeTabandformPageIndex)- Implementing the
undomethod to support the new remove field functionalityAddressing these points will enhance the robustness of the store and prevent potential runtime errors.
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (5)
5-5: LGTM: Addition of form-block refThe addition of the
ref="form-block"attribute is a good practice. It allows for easier manipulation of the component's DOM when needed, which can be useful for certain operations or animations.
97-103: LGTM: Improved image upload promptThe update to the image upload prompt, including a clickable link, is a good improvement to the user experience. It makes the action required to upload an image more clear and intuitive.
277-280: LGTM: Improved setFieldAsSelected methodThe addition of checks for
adminPreviewandshowEditFieldSidebarin thesetFieldAsSelectedmethod is a good improvement. It ensures that the method only executes when appropriate, preventing unnecessary actions and potential errors.
281-284: LGTM: Improved openAddFieldSidebar methodThe addition of a check for
adminPreviewin theopenAddFieldSidebarmethod is a good improvement. It ensures that the method only executes when in admin preview mode, preventing unnecessary actions and potential errors.
338-341: LGTM: Improved flexibility for select fieldsThe addition of the
clearableproperty for non-required select and multi-select fields is a good improvement. It enhances user experience by allowing users to clear their selection when the field is not mandatory, providing more flexibility in form filling.
| removeField(field) { | ||
| this.internalRemoveField(field) | ||
| }, | ||
| internalRemoveField(field) { | ||
| const index = this.objectToIndex(field) | ||
|
|
||
| if (index !== -1) { | ||
| useAlert().success('Ctrl + Z to undo',10000,{ | ||
| title: 'Field removed', | ||
| actions: [{ | ||
| label: 'Undo', | ||
| icon:"i-material-symbols-undo", | ||
| click: () => { | ||
| this.undo() | ||
| } | ||
| }] | ||
| }) | ||
| this.content.properties.splice(index, 1) | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement undo functionality to prevent runtime errors
The addition of removeField and internalRemoveField methods with undo functionality is a good improvement for user experience. However, the this.undo() method called in the alert action is not defined, which could lead to a runtime error.
To resolve this, implement the undo method in the store. Here's a suggested implementation:
undo() {
if (this.history && this.history.length > 0) {
const lastAction = this.history.pop();
if (lastAction.type === 'removeField') {
const { field, index } = lastAction;
this.content.properties.splice(index, 0, field);
}
// Add more action types as needed
}
},
internalRemoveField(field) {
const index = this.objectToIndex(field)
if (index !== -1) {
const removedField = this.content.properties[index];
this.history.push({ type: 'removeField', field: removedField, index });
useAlert().success('Ctrl + Z to undo',10000,{
title: 'Field removed',
actions: [{
label: 'Undo',
icon:"i-material-symbols-undo",
click: () => {
this.undo()
}
}]
})
this.content.properties.splice(index, 1)
}
},This implementation adds a simple history mechanism to the store, allowing for undo functionality. Remember to initialize this.history = [] in the state.
| @@ -107,7 +89,7 @@ export const useWorkingFormStore = defineStore("working_form", { | |||
|
|
|||
| addBlock(type, index = null) { | |||
| this.blockForm.type = type | |||
| this.blockForm.name = defaultBlockNames[type] | |||
| this.blockForm.name = blocksTypes[type].default_block_name | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with suggestion: Add safety check for block type
The update to use blocksTypes for the default block name is good and aligns with the new import. However, to further improve robustness, consider adding a safety check to handle cases where the block type might not be defined in blocksTypes.
Apply this diff to add a safety check:
- this.blockForm.name = blocksTypes[type].default_block_name
+ this.blockForm.name = blocksTypes[type]?.default_block_name || `Untitled ${type} Block`This change ensures that even if a block type is not defined in blocksTypes, a default name will still be assigned.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.blockForm.name = blocksTypes[type].default_block_name | |
| this.blockForm.name = blocksTypes[type]?.default_block_name || `Untitled ${type} Block` |
| objectToIndex(field) { | ||
| if (typeof field === 'object') { | ||
| return this.content.properties.findIndex( | ||
| prop => prop.id === field.id | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| this.selectedFieldIndex = index | ||
| return field | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null checks to prevent potential runtime errors
The objectToIndex method is a useful addition for flexible field management. However, it doesn't address the concern raised in a previous review about potential null references. To prevent runtime errors, consider adding null checks for this.content and this.content.properties.
Apply this diff to add safety checks:
objectToIndex(field) {
+ if (!this.content || !this.content.properties) {
+ console.warn('Content or properties are undefined in objectToIndex');
+ return -1;
+ }
if (typeof field === 'object') {
return this.content.properties.findIndex(
prop => prop.id === field.id
)
}
return field
},Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| objectToIndex(field) { | |
| if (typeof field === 'object') { | |
| return this.content.properties.findIndex( | |
| prop => prop.id === field.id | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| this.selectedFieldIndex = index | |
| return field | |
| }, | |
| objectToIndex(field) { | |
| if (!this.content || !this.content.properties) { | |
| console.warn('Content or properties are undefined in objectToIndex'); | |
| return -1; | |
| } | |
| if (typeof field === 'object') { | |
| return this.content.properties.findIndex( | |
| prop => prop.id === field.id | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| return field | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
client/pages/forms/create/guest.vue (2)
16-20: Improved loading state presentationThe addition of "text-center mt-4 py-6" classes to the Loader container enhances its visual presentation. This change provides better spacing and alignment for the loading indicator.
For consistency with the form-editor component, consider adding the "w-full" class to ensure the loader takes up the full width:
- class="text-center mt-4 py-6" + class="w-full text-center mt-4 py-6"
Line range hint
31-105: Script section unchangedThe script section of the component remains unmodified. It handles form initialization, template loading, and user authentication as before.
Consider breaking down the script into smaller, more focused composables or helper functions to improve maintainability. For example, you could extract the form initialization logic into a separate composable:
// useFormInitialization.js import { ref, onMounted } from 'vue' import { useRoute } from 'vue-router' import { useTemplatesStore, useWorkingFormStore, useWorkspacesStore } from '~/stores' import { initForm } from '~/composables/forms/initForm.js' export function useFormInitialization() { const route = useRoute() const templatesStore = useTemplatesStore() const workingFormStore = useWorkingFormStore() const workspacesStore = useWorkspacesStore() const form = storeToRefs(workingFormStore).content const showInitialFormModal = ref(false) onMounted(() => { // ... (existing initialization logic) }) return { form, showInitialFormModal, } }Then, in your component:
import { useFormInitialization } from './useFormInitialization' // ... const { form, showInitialFormModal } = useFormInitialization()This refactoring would make the component more focused and easier to maintain.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (3)
3-7: LGTM! Consider adding a description prop.The addition of the
EditorSectionHeadercomponent improves the organization and visual structure of the form customization options. The icon and title are appropriate for the "Basic Appearance" section.Consider adding a
descriptionprop to theEditorSectionHeadercomponent to provide more context about the "Basic Appearance" section if needed.
20-35: LGTM! Consider adding aria-label for accessibility.The addition of the
color-inputcomponent with a reset option is a good improvement for user customization. The help text clearly explains the purpose of the color selection.Consider adding an
aria-labelto the reset link to improve accessibility:<a class="text-blue-500" href="#" + aria-label="Reset color to default" @click.prevent="form.color = DEFAULT_COLOR" >Reset</a>
159-161: LGTM! Improved clarity for advanced options.The changes to the toggle switch inputs in the Advanced Options section are good improvements:
- Renaming "Hide Title" to "Hide Form Title" provides better clarity.
- Adding conditional help text for the progress bar option is helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief explanation for the "Hide Form Title" option as well, to maintain consistency with the other options in this section.
Also applies to: 164-171
client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (3)
7-25: Approve mobile warning message with a suggestionThe addition of a mobile warning message is a good improvement for user experience. It clearly informs users about the lack of mobile optimization and provides a way to return to the dashboard.
Consider adding a
data-testidattribute to the warning div for easier testing. For example:<div class="border-b bg-white md:hidden fixed inset-0 w-full z-50 flex flex-col items-center justify-center" + data-testid="mobile-warning" >
72-72: Approve addition of FormSettings component with a suggestionThe introduction of the FormSettings component, conditionally rendered based on the activeTab, is a good improvement in code organization.
For consistency with the other conditionally rendered components, consider wrapping the FormSettings component in a div with v-show:
-<FormSettings v-show="activeTab === 2" /> +<div v-show="activeTab === 2"> + <FormSettings /> +</div>This structure would be more consistent with the FormFieldsEditor and FormCustomization components.
178-184: Approve mounted hook changes with a suggestionThe changes in the mounted hook are beneficial:
- The addition of amplitude logging for the 'form_editor_viewed' event is good for tracking user interactions.
- Automatically opening the addFieldSidebar for new forms can improve user experience by guiding users to start adding fields immediately.
Consider extracting the logic for opening the addFieldSidebar into a separate method for better readability and potential reuse. For example:
methods: { openAddFieldSidebarForNewForm() { if (!this.isEdit) { this.$nextTick(() => { this.workingFormStore.openAddFieldSidebar() }) } } }, mounted() { this.$emit("mounted") useAmplitude().logEvent('form_editor_viewed') this.appStore.hideNavbar() this.openAddFieldSidebarForNewForm() }client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (1)
4-4: Consider consistency in vertical spacingThe change from
py-2topb-2removes the top padding. Ensure this aligns with the desired layout and doesn't create inconsistencies with other components.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (18)
- client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/forms/components/InputHelp.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/global/Modal.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSection.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue (13 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (6 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (6 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorSidebar.vue (2 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/ConditionEditor.client.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue (4 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (12 hunks)
- client/components/pages/forms/create/CreateFormBaseModal.vue (1 hunks)
- client/composables/forms/initForm.js (2 hunks)
- client/data/blocks_types.json (1 hunks)
- client/pages/forms/create/guest.vue (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- client/components/forms/DateInput.vue
- client/components/pages/forms/create/CreateFormBaseModal.vue
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- client/components/global/Settings/SettingsSection.vue
- client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue
- client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue
- client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/FormBlockLogicEditor.vue
- client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue
- client/composables/forms/initForm.js
Additional comments not posted (24)
client/components/forms/components/InputHelp.vue (1)
4-4: Verify layout changes due to class modifications.The class changes on the main div (
mb-1removed,flexadded) will affect the component's layout:
- Removing
mb-1eliminates the bottom margin.- Adding
flexenables flexbox layout.These modifications might impact the overall spacing and alignment of the component.
Please review the visual appearance of this component in various contexts to ensure the layout changes don't negatively impact the design.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorSidebar.vue (1)
3-4: Improved sidebar flexibility and readabilityThe changes to the
editor-right-sidebarcomponent enhance its flexibility and improve code readability:
- The new
:width-classprop allows for dynamic adjustment of the sidebar width based on theshowAddFieldSidebarstate.- The
:showprop now uses theisOpencomputed property, which centralizes the visibility logic and makes it easier to maintain.These modifications make the component more adaptable to different states and improve the overall structure of the code.
client/pages/forms/create/guest.vue (1)
8-15: Enhanced form editor layoutThe addition of "w-full flex flex-grow" classes to the form-editor component improves its layout behavior. This change ensures the form editor takes up the full width and grows to fill available space, consistent with the parent container's flex layout.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/AddFormBlock.vue (2)
3-14: LGTM: Improved header sectionThe changes in the header section look good. Using the
Iconcomponent instead of an inline SVG improves maintainability and consistency. ThecloseSidebarfunction is correctly bound to the button's click event.
85-107: LGTM: Improved script section with<script setup>syntaxThe transition to
<script setup>syntax is a good modernization step. The computed properties forinputBlocksandlayoutBlocksare well-defined and use appropriate filtering. ThecloseSidebar,addBlock, andhandleInputClonefunctions are correctly implemented.Could you please clarify the purpose of the
workingFormStore.resetBlockForm()call at the end of the script? It's not immediately clear why this is necessary. Consider adding a comment to explain its purpose if it's required.client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/ConditionEditor.client.vue (4)
2-5: LGTM: Improved readability of ErrorBoundary componentThe rearrangement of attributes in the ErrorBoundary component enhances code readability without affecting functionality. This change aligns with Vue.js style guide recommendations for multi-attribute elements.
10-10: LGTM: Added attribute inheritance to query-builderThe addition of
v-bind="$attrs"to the query-builder component enhances its flexibility by allowing it to inherit additional attributes from its parent. This can improve component reusability.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please verify:
- The intended attributes are being passed correctly.
- No unintended attributes are affecting the component's behavior.
You can use Vue DevTools to inspect the component and its inherited attributes in different usage scenarios.
15-15: Clarify intention: Margin-bottom class modificationThe class attribute of the div element in the groupOperator template slot has been modified. The trailing "1" from the "mb-" class has been removed, which will affect the margin-bottom styling.
Was this change intentional? If so, please confirm that the layout and spacing of the component are still correct. If this was unintentional, consider restoring the original class:
- class="query-builder-group-slot__group-selection flex items-center px-5 border-b py-1 mb-" + class="query-builder-group-slot__group-selection flex items-center px-5 border-b py-1 mb-1"
21-27: LGTM: Adjusted select-input styling and propsThe changes to the select-input component appear intentional and consistent:
- Adding "mb-0" to the wrapper-class removes the bottom margin.
- Setting :help to null explicitly indicates that no help text should be displayed.
To ensure these changes achieve the desired layout:
- Verify that the removal of bottom margin (mb-0) doesn't cause any unintended spacing issues.
- Confirm that the absence of help text doesn't affect the user experience negatively.
Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind these changes to improve code maintainability.
client/data/blocks_types.json (1)
1-162: Well-structured and consistent JSON formatThe overall structure of the
blocks_types.jsonfile is well-organized and consistent. Each block type has the same set of properties (name, title, icon, default_block_name, bg_class, text_class), which makes the file easy to read and maintain. This consistency will be beneficial for future updates and additions to the block types.client/components/global/Modal.vue (1)
7-7: Approved, but please provide context for the z-index change.The increase in z-index from
z-30toz-40for the modal backdrop is likely addressing a specific issue. However, to maintain code clarity and prevent potential "z-index wars", please consider the following:
- Add a comment explaining why this z-index increase was necessary.
- Review z-index values across the application to ensure consistency and prevent unintended consequences.
To help understand the context of this change, let's check for other high z-index values in the codebase:
This will help us understand if there are other components that might be affected by or related to this z-index change.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (5)
36-46: LGTM! Good addition of color mode options.The new
select-inputcomponent for color mode is a valuable addition to the form customization options. It provides clear choices for users (Auto, Light Mode, Dark Mode) and includes helpful text explaining the "Auto" option.
48-51: LGTM! Improved organization with section headers.The addition of
EditorSectionHeadercomponents for Typography, Layout & Sizing, and Branding & Media significantly improves the organization and visual structure of the form customization options. The icons and titles are appropriate and relevant to their respective sections.Also applies to: 77-80, 117-119
71-75: LGTM! Good addition of uppercase labels option.The new
toggle-switch-inputfor "Uppercase Input Labels" is a useful customization option. Its placement within the Typography section is appropriate and enhances the user's ability to fine-tune the form's appearance.
194-194: LGTM! Correct import for new component.The addition of the import statement for the
EditorSectionHeadercomponent is correct and corresponds to its usage in the template section.
Line range hint
1-265: Overall, great improvements to form customization UI!The changes in this file significantly enhance the organization and user experience of the form customization interface. The introduction of
EditorSectionHeadercomponents and the restructuring of options into logical sections make the interface more intuitive and easier to navigate. The new color mode and uppercase label options provide additional flexibility for users.A few minor suggestions were made to further improve accessibility and consistency. Once these are addressed, the changes will greatly benefit the overall usability of the form editor.
client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (3)
29-39: Approve addition of FormEditorNavbar componentThe introduction of the FormEditorNavbar component is a good improvement in terms of code organization and reusability. It encapsulates the navigation and form saving actions, which is appropriate for a navbar component. The use of props and events ensures proper communication with the parent component, while the slot provides flexibility for additional content.
Line range hint
90-157: Approve script section updatesThe changes in the script section appropriately reflect the updates made in the template:
- The new component imports align with the components added to the template.
- The emits array has been correctly updated to include the new events used in the FormEditorNavbar.
- The addition of the activeTab computed property supports the conditional rendering in the template.
These changes contribute to improved code organization and functionality.
41-69: Approve form editor layout restructuring with a queryThe restructuring of the form editor layout improves the organization of different editing functionalities. The use of conditional rendering based on the activeTab is a good approach for managing the visibility of different sections.
Could you please clarify the purpose of wrapping FormFieldsEditor and FormCustomization components within a VForm component? Is it used for form validation, and if so, how is it configured?
To help verify the VForm usage, you can run the following script:
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (5)
27-30: Consistent use ofEditorSectionHeaderimproves UI structureThe introduction of
EditorSectionHeadercomponents across various sections enhances visual consistency and improves the overall structure of the form editor. This is a positive change that should make the UI more intuitive for users.Also applies to: 44-47, 84-87, 103-106, 139-142, 181-184, 205-208, 271-274, 303-305, 552-555
580-581: Verify the integration of new componentsThe new components
HiddenRequiredDisabledandEditorSectionHeaderhave been imported and added to the component definition. Ensure that these components are properly implemented and that they don't introduce any new bugs or performance issues.To verify the implementation, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the existence and basic structure of the new components for component in HiddenRequiredDisabled EditorSectionHeader; do echo "Checking $component:" ast-grep --lang vue --pattern "export default { name: '$component', $$$ }" client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/$component.vue doneAlso applies to: 587-587
Line range hint
538-543: New toggle for character limit visibilityA new toggle switch has been added to control the visibility of the character limit. Ensure that this new feature is working as expected and that it doesn't conflict with existing character limit functionality.
To verify the implementation, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the handling of the new show_char_limit property ast-grep --lang vue --pattern '$$$ if ($_) { $$$ show_char_limit: $_, $$$ } $$$' client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue
Line range hint
1-824: Overall positive restructuring, but requires thorough testingThe changes to this component represent a significant improvement in structure and maintainability. The introduction of new components like
HiddenRequiredDisabledandEditorSectionHeaderhelps to encapsulate common functionality and improve UI consistency. However, given the extent of the changes, it's crucial to conduct thorough testing to ensure that:
- All existing functionality remains intact.
- The new components work as expected in all scenarios.
- There are no performance regressions due to the restructuring.
- The user experience has been maintained or improved.
Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the new component structure and interactions.
To assist in verifying the changes, you can run the following script to check for any existing tests that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing tests related to FieldOptions rg -g '*.spec.js' -g '*.test.js' 'FieldOptions' tests/
16-18: Verify the implementation of the newHiddenRequiredDisabledcomponentThe introduction of this new component encapsulates the functionality for hidden, required, and disabled field properties. Ensure that it correctly handles all scenarios and maintains the existing functionality.
To verify the implementation, you can run the following script:
| <small | ||
| v-if="shouldRender || (!!slots.default)" | ||
| class="flex-grow" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve changes with a suggestion for improvement.
The modifications to the 'after-help' slot enhance the component's flexibility:
- The new conditional rendering
v-if="shouldRender || (!!slots.default)"provides more granular control. - The 'flex-grow' class allows the element to fill available space in a flex container.
These changes improve the component's adaptability to different usage scenarios.
Consider refactoring the logic to avoid rendering an empty <small> element:
<slot name="after-help">
<template v-if="shouldRender || !!slots.default">
<small class="flex-grow">
<slot name="after-help-content"></slot>
</small>
</template>
</slot>This approach ensures that the <small> element is only rendered when there's actual content to display.
| isOpen() { | ||
| return this.form !== null && (this.showEditFieldSidebar || this.showAddFieldSidebar) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Centralized sidebar visibility logic with room for improvement
The addition of the isOpen computed property is a good improvement:
- It centralizes the logic for determining sidebar visibility.
- It makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand.
However, there's a potential improvement to consider:
The condition this.form !== null might not be sufficient to ensure that form is properly initialized. In JavaScript, an object can be not null but still be undefined.
Consider updating the isOpen computed property to use a more robust check:
isOpen() {
return this.form != null && (this.showEditFieldSidebar || this.showAddFieldSidebar)
}This change uses != instead of !==, which checks for both null and undefined, providing a more comprehensive check for the existence of form.
| > | ||
| <Loader class="h-6 w-6 text-nt-blue mx-auto" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="flex flex-wrap flex-col flex-grow"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improved layout flexibility
The addition of flex classes to the outer div enhances the component's layout flexibility. This change allows for better responsiveness and utilization of available space.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these classes for better maintainability:
- <div class="flex flex-wrap flex-col flex-grow">
+ <!-- Flex container for responsive layout -->
+ <div class="flex flex-wrap flex-col flex-grow">Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div class="flex flex-wrap flex-col flex-grow"> | |
| <!-- Flex container for responsive layout --> | |
| <div class="flex flex-wrap flex-col flex-grow"> |
| <p class="text-sm font-medium my-2"> | ||
| Input Blocks | ||
| </p> | ||
| <draggable | ||
| :list="inputBlocks" | ||
| :group="{ name: 'form-elements', pull: 'clone', put: false }" | ||
| class="flex flex-col -mx-2" | ||
| :sort="false" | ||
| :clone="handleInputClone" | ||
| ghost-class="ghost-item" | ||
| item-key="id" | ||
| @start="workingFormStore.draggingNewBlock=true" | ||
| @end="workingFormStore.draggingNewBlock=false" | ||
| > | ||
| <template #item="{element}"> | ||
| <div | ||
| class="flex hover:bg-gray-50 rounded-md items-center gap-2 p-2" | ||
| role="button" | ||
| @click.prevent="addBlock(element.name)" | ||
| > | ||
| <BlockTypeIcon :type="element.name" /> | ||
| <p | ||
| class="w-full text-sm text-gray-500" | ||
| > | ||
| <div class="mx-auto"> | ||
| <svg | ||
| xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
| class="h-6 w-6 text-gray-500" | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
| stroke="currentColor" | ||
| stroke-width="2" | ||
| v-html="element.icon" | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <p | ||
| class="w-full text-xs text-gray-500 uppercase text-center font-semibold mt-1" | ||
| > | ||
| {{ element.title }} | ||
| </p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </template> | ||
| </draggable> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div class="border-t mt-6"> | ||
| <p class="text-gray-500 uppercase text-xs font-semibold mb-2 mt-6"> | ||
| Layout Blocks | ||
| </p> | ||
| <draggable | ||
| :list="layoutBlocks" | ||
| :group="{ name: 'form-elements', pull: 'clone', put: false }" | ||
| class="grid grid-cols-2 gap-2" | ||
| :sort="false" | ||
| :clone="handleInputClone" | ||
| ghost-class="ghost-item" | ||
| item-key="id" | ||
| > | ||
| <template #item="{element}"> | ||
| <div | ||
| class="bg-gray-50 border hover:bg-gray-100 dark:bg-gray-900 rounded-md dark:hover:bg-gray-800 py-2 flex flex-col" | ||
| role="button" | ||
| @click.prevent="addBlock(element.name)" | ||
| {{ element.title }} | ||
| </p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </template> | ||
| </draggable> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM: Improved Input Blocks section with potential for refactoring
The new structure for Input Blocks is well-organized and consistent. The draggable component is properly implemented with correct event handling, which is good for user interaction.
However, I notice that this section is very similar to the Layout Blocks section.
Consider creating a reusable component for both Input and Layout Blocks to reduce code duplication. This component could accept the block list and title as props. Here's a basic example:
<!-- BlockList.vue -->
<template>
<div :class="{ 'border-t': !isFirst }">
<p class="text-sm font-medium my-2">{{ title }}</p>
<draggable
:list="blocks"
:group="{ name: 'form-elements', pull: 'clone', put: false }"
class="flex flex-col -mx-2"
:sort="false"
:clone="handleInputClone"
ghost-class="ghost-item"
item-key="id"
@start="workingFormStore.draggingNewBlock=true"
@end="workingFormStore.draggingNewBlock=false"
>
<template #item="{element}">
<div
class="flex hover:bg-gray-50 rounded-md items-center gap-2 p-2"
role="button"
@click.prevent="addBlock(element.name)"
>
<BlockTypeIcon :type="element.name" />
<p class="w-full text-sm text-gray-500">
{{ element.title }}
</p>
</div>
</template>
</draggable>
</div>
</template>
<script setup>
import { useWorkingFormStore } from '~/stores/workingForm'
import BlockTypeIcon from './BlockTypeIcon.vue'
const props = defineProps({
title: String,
blocks: Array,
isFirst: Boolean,
})
const workingFormStore = useWorkingFormStore()
const addBlock = (type) => {
workingFormStore.addBlock(type)
}
const handleInputClone = (item) => {
return item.name
}
</script>Then, in your main component:
<template>
<div>
<!-- ... header ... -->
<BlockList title="Input Blocks" :blocks="inputBlocks" :isFirst="true" />
<BlockList title="Layout Blocks" :blocks="layoutBlocks" :isFirst="false" />
</div>
</template>
<script setup>
import BlockList from './BlockList.vue'
// ... other imports and logic ...
</script>This refactoring would significantly reduce code duplication and make the component easier to maintain.
| "nf-text": { | ||
| "name": "nf-text", | ||
| "title": "Text", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-bars-3", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Text", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-page-break": { | ||
| "name": "nf-page-break", | ||
| "title": "Page-break", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-document-plus", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Page Break", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-gray-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-gray-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-divider": { | ||
| "name": "nf-divider", | ||
| "title": "Divider", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-minus", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Divider", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-gray-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-gray-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-image": { | ||
| "name": "nf-image", | ||
| "title": "Image", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-photo", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Image", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-code": { | ||
| "name": "nf-code", | ||
| "title": "Code", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-code-bracket", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Code Block", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve naming convention for non-form elements
While the naming convention for form inputs is clear and concise, the "nf-" prefix for non-form elements (lines 122-161) could be improved for better clarity and consistency. Consider using more descriptive names or grouping these elements differently.
For example:
"content_text": {
"name": "content_text",
"title": "Text",
"icon": "i-heroicons-bars-3",
"default_block_name": "Text",
"bg_class": "bg-yellow-100",
"text_class": "text-yellow-900"
},This approach would make it clearer that these are content elements rather than form inputs, without relying on the "nf-" prefix. It would also be more consistent with the naming convention used for form inputs.
| "bg_class": "bg-red-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-red-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "matrix": { | ||
| "name": "matrix", | ||
| "title": "Matrix Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-table-cells-20-solid", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Matrix", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-red-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-red-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "number": { | ||
| "name": "number", | ||
| "title": "Number Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-hashtag-20-solid", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Number", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-purple-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-purple-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "rating": { | ||
| "name": "rating", | ||
| "title": "Rating Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-star", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Rating", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-purple-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-purple-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "scale": { | ||
| "name": "scale", | ||
| "title": "Scale Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-scale-20-solid", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Scale", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-purple-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-purple-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "slider": { | ||
| "name": "slider", | ||
| "title": "Slider Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-adjustments-horizontal", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Slider", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-purple-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-purple-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "files": { | ||
| "name": "files", | ||
| "title": "File Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-paper-clip", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Files", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-pink-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-pink-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "signature": { | ||
| "name": "signature", | ||
| "title": "Signature Input", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-pencil-square-20-solid", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Signature", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-pink-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-pink-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-text": { | ||
| "name": "nf-text", | ||
| "title": "Text", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-bars-3", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Text", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-page-break": { | ||
| "name": "nf-page-break", | ||
| "title": "Page-break", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-document-plus", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Page Break", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-gray-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-gray-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-divider": { | ||
| "name": "nf-divider", | ||
| "title": "Divider", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-minus", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Divider", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-gray-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-gray-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-image": { | ||
| "name": "nf-image", | ||
| "title": "Image", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-photo", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Image", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| }, | ||
| "nf-code": { | ||
| "name": "nf-code", | ||
| "title": "Code", | ||
| "icon": "i-heroicons-code-bracket", | ||
| "default_block_name": "Code Block", | ||
| "bg_class": "bg-yellow-100", | ||
| "text_class": "text-yellow-900" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance color scheme consistency for improved visual grouping
The current color scheme for background and text classes varies across different block types. While some consistency exists (e.g., purple for number-related inputs), there's an opportunity to improve the visual grouping of similar input types.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Text-based inputs (text, url, phone_number, email) could use the same color scheme (currently all blue, which is good).
- Selection inputs (checkbox, select, multi_select, matrix) could share another distinct color (currently all red, which is consistent).
- Numeric inputs (number, rating, scale, slider) already share the purple color scheme, which is good.
- File-related inputs (files, signature) share the pink color scheme, which is appropriate.
- Non-form elements (nf-text, nf-image, nf-code) could have a consistent color scheme to distinguish them from form inputs (currently a mix of yellow and gray).
Implementing a more consistent color scheme would enhance visual distinction between different groups of inputs and improve user experience by allowing users to quickly identify input types based on color.
| <image-input | ||
| name="cover_picture" | ||
| :form="form" | ||
| > | ||
| <template #help> | ||
| <InputHelp> | ||
| <span class="text-gray-500"> | ||
| Color (for buttons & inputs border) - <a | ||
| class="text-blue-500" | ||
| href="#" | ||
| @click.prevent="form.color = DEFAULT_COLOR" | ||
| >Reset</a> | ||
| </span> | ||
| </InputHelp> | ||
| </template> | ||
| </color-input> | ||
|
|
||
| label="Color (for buttons & inputs border)" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect label for cover picture input.
The label for the cover picture image-input component appears to be incorrect. It currently says "Color (for buttons & inputs border)", which is not appropriate for an image input.
Please update the label to correctly describe the cover picture input:
<image-input
name="cover_picture"
:form="form"
- label="Color (for buttons & inputs border)"
+ label="Cover Picture"
/>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <image-input | |
| name="cover_picture" | |
| :form="form" | |
| > | |
| <template #help> | |
| <InputHelp> | |
| <span class="text-gray-500"> | |
| Color (for buttons & inputs border) - <a | |
| class="text-blue-500" | |
| href="#" | |
| @click.prevent="form.color = DEFAULT_COLOR" | |
| >Reset</a> | |
| </span> | |
| </InputHelp> | |
| </template> | |
| </color-input> | |
| label="Color (for buttons & inputs border)" | |
| /> | |
| <image-input | |
| name="cover_picture" | |
| :form="form" | |
| label="Cover Picture" | |
| /> |
| // Apply defaults to the form | ||
| const defaultedData = setFormDefaults(this.form.data()) | ||
| console.log('defaultedData', defaultedData) | ||
| this.form.fill(defaultedData) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove console.log and approve form default application
The application of form defaults using setFormDefaults before saving is a good practice to ensure data consistency. However, there's an issue that needs to be addressed:
The console.log statement should be removed from production code. This was mentioned in a previous review and is still applicable. Please remove this line:
- console.log('defaultedData', defaultedData)The rest of the changes in this segment, particularly the application of form defaults, are approved and contribute to improved data handling.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Apply defaults to the form | |
| const defaultedData = setFormDefaults(this.form.data()) | |
| console.log('defaultedData', defaultedData) | |
| this.form.fill(defaultedData) | |
| // Apply defaults to the form | |
| const defaultedData = setFormDefaults(this.form.data()) | |
| this.form.fill(defaultedData) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (6 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue (1 hunks)
- client/components/open/forms/fields/components/ChangeFieldType.vue (2 hunks)
- client/middleware/self-hosted.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue
- client/components/open/forms/fields/FormFieldEdit.vue
Additional comments not posted (9)
client/middleware/self-hosted.js (3)
1-1: LGTM: Updated middleware function signatureThe removal of the
nextparameter from the middleware function signature is appropriate and aligns with modern Nuxt 3 practices. This change doesn't affect the functionality sincenextwasn't used in the function body.
3-3: Improved query parameter checkThe condition now correctly uses
to.queryinstead ofroute.query. This change enhances the logic flow by ensuring that the middleware checks the query parameters of the destination route (to) rather than the current route (from).
Line range hint
1-11: Verify impact on routing behaviorWhile the changes look good, it's important to ensure that this update doesn't unintentionally affect the routing behavior in the application, especially for the register and AI form builder routes.
Let's verify the usage of this middleware and related components:
client/components/open/forms/fields/components/ChangeFieldType.vue (6)
2-5: Verify the purpose of the "-mb-1" class on UPopoverThe transition to UPopover looks good and follows Vue 3 syntax. However, the purpose of the "-mb-1" class is not immediately clear.
Could you clarify the intention behind this negative margin? If it's for alignment purposes, consider using more descriptive utility classes or a custom class with a clear name.
7-13: Good use of flex layout and hover effectsThe new trigger structure is well-organized and visually appealing. The use of flex layout and group classes for hover effects is a good practice.
32-32: Verify the need for an empty components propertyThe components property is currently empty. If this is intentional (e.g., all components are globally registered), consider removing this property entirely for cleaner code.
Please confirm if the empty components property is necessary or if it can be removed.
41-43: Good addition of 'open' data propertyThe new 'open' data property is correctly implemented and used with the v-model:open binding in the template. This is a good practice for managing the popover's state.
97-97: Correct update to changeType methodThe changeType method has been correctly updated to manage the popover's open state. This ensures that the popover closes after a type change, improving the user experience.
Line range hint
1-103: Overall improvement in component structure and maintainabilityThe transition from Dropdown to UPopover and the simplification of the template structure are positive changes. These updates should improve both the performance and maintainability of the component. The script section changes, particularly the management of the popover's open state, enhance the user experience.
While there are a few minor suggestions for improvement (such as clarifying class usage and potentially removing the empty components property), the overall direction of these changes is commendable.
| <template #panel> | ||
| <a | ||
| v-for="(op, index) in changeTypeOptions" | ||
| :key="index" | ||
| href="#" | ||
| class="block px-4 py-2 text-md text-gray-700 dark:text-white hover:bg-gray-100 hover:text-gray-900 dark:text-gray-100 dark:hover:text-white dark:hover:bg-gray-600 flex items-center" | ||
| @click.prevent="changeType(op.value)" | ||
| > | ||
| <svg | ||
| xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
| stroke-width="2" | ||
| stroke="currentColor" | ||
| class="h-4 w-4 text-blue-600 inline mr-1 -mt-1" | ||
| > | ||
| <path | ||
| stroke-linecap="round" | ||
| stroke-linejoin="round" | ||
| d="M7.5 21L3 16.5m0 0L7.5 12M3 16.5h13.5m0-13.5L21 7.5m0 0L16.5 12M21 7.5H7.5" | ||
| /> | ||
| </svg> | ||
| <span class="whitespace-nowrap">Change Type</span> | ||
| </v-button> | ||
| {{ op.name }} | ||
| </a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using utility classes for better maintainability
The panel template structure is simpler and more maintainable. However, the inline styles on the anchor elements are quite long.
Consider extracting these styles into utility classes or a separate CSS class for better maintainability. For example:
<a
v-for="(op, index) in changeTypeOptions"
:key="index"
href="#"
class="change-type-option"
@click.prevent="changeType(op.value)"
>
{{ op.name }}
</a>Then define the change-type-option class in your styles section or a separate CSS file.
@JhumanJ can you please check this part
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
UPopovercomponent.Bug Fixes
Refactor