Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @typescript-eslint/parser to v7.1.0 #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 7.0.2 -> 7.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v7.1.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 29, 2024 19:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-parser-7.x-lockfile branch from 537ed9c to 76a91ca Compare February 29, 2024 23:28
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 45f6acb into main Feb 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-parser-7.x-lockfile branch February 29, 2024 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants