Drop support for ArrayInterface 6?

[chriselrod]

Rather than get these warnings:

julia> using StrideArraysCore
[ Info: Precompiling StrideArraysCore [7792a7ef-975c-4747-a70f-980b88e8d1da]
WARNING: Method definition getindex(ArrayInterfaceCore.ArrayIndex{N} where N, Union{Int64, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}, Union{Int64, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}...) in module ArrayInterface at /home/chriselrod/.julia/packages/ArrayInterface/4RbA4/src/array_index.jl:23 overwritten in module StaticArrayInterface at /home/chriselrod/.julia/packages/StaticArrayInterface/gJiae/src/array_index.jl:9.
  ** incremental compilation may be fatally broken for this module **

WARNING: Method definition size(StrideArraysCore.AbstractStrideArray{T, N, R, S, X, O} where O<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}, N}} where X<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Nothing, Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N, StrideArraysCore.StrideReset{T} where T}, N}} where S<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}, N}} where R where N where T) in module StrideArraysCore at /home/chriselrod/.julia/dev/StrideArraysCore/src/ptr_array.jl:463 overwritten at /home/chriselrod/.julia/dev/StrideArraysCore/src/ptr_array.jl:480.
  ** incremental compilation may be fatally broken for this module **

WARNING: Method definition axes(StrideArraysCore.AbstractStrideArray{T, N, R, S, X, O} where O<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}, N}} where X<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Nothing, Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N, StrideArraysCore.StrideReset{T} where T}, N}} where S<:Tuple{Vararg{Union{Int128, Int16, Int32, Int64, Int8, UInt128, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64, UInt8, Static.StaticInt{N} where N}, N}} where R where N where T) in module StrideArraysCore at /home/chriselrod/.julia/dev/StrideArraysCore/src/ptr_array.jl:481 overwritten at /home/chriselrod/.julia/dev/StrideArraysCore/src/ptr_array.jl:482.
  ** incremental compilation may be fatally broken for this module **

I'd prefer to immediately get a compat error to find out why there is a conflict.

Is there a reason a package may want ArrayInterface 6 + StaticArrayInterface?

[ChrisRackauckas]

Just for the upgrade path. We can yank v1.1 once everything is through in about a week, but I think everything does work with v6?

[chriselrod]

FWIW,I filed this issue because I added an ArrayInterface dependency to a package just so I can pin it to 7 while upgrading.

[chriselrod]

I saw you yanked the old version.
However, packages still on ArrayInterface v6 now throw an odd error message:

julia> @time using OrdinaryDiffEq
┌ Error: Error during loading of extension ArrayInterfaceGPUArraysCoreExt of ArrayInterface, use `Base.retry_load_extensions()` to retry.
└ @ Base loading.jl:1190
┌ Error: Error during loading of extension ArrayInterfaceStaticArraysCoreExt of ArrayInterface, use `Base.retry_load_extensions()` to retry.
└ @ Base loading.jl:1190
  9.975802 seconds (23.23 M allocations: 1.292 GiB, 9.59% gc time, 1.11% compilation time: 15% of which was recompilation)

With ArrayInterface v6, we shouldn't have extensions at all.

As explained in my next comment, I think this is a Pkg bug.
Or at least, I have no idea how anything we've done could cause it, and the error message is thoroughly unhelpful in explaining how if the error is indeed on our side.

[chriselrod]

julia> using StaticArrays, ArrayInterface
WARNING: using StaticArrays.pop in module Main conflicts with an existing identifier.
┌ Error: Error during loading of extension ArrayInterfaceStaticArraysCoreExt of ArrayInterface, use `Base.retry_load_extensions()` to retry.
└ @ Base loading.jl:1190

(p0) pkg> st -m ArrayInterface
Status `~/Documents/progwork/julia/env/p0/Manifest.toml`
⌅ [4fba245c] ArrayInterface v6.0.23
Info Packages marked with ⌅ have new versions available but compatibility constraints restrict them from upgrading. To see why use `status --outdated -m`

Maybe it is a Pkg bug?
Why is it trying to load the extension? Where is the extension coming from?
Not from ArrayInterface v6.0.23...

On the plus side, the errors are non-blocking.
And because these extensions aren't supposed to be loaded anyway, that they failed to load isn't a problem. The message is just visual noise, and prompts concern that whatever made Pkg think they should be loaded is related to some other problem that could cause unforeseen issues.

[visr]

Maybe it is a Pkg bug? Why is it trying to load the extension?

This looks like it might be fixed by JuliaLang/julia#48703.

[chriselrod]

Yes, it does. I was on a 2-day old master, and looks like it was merged yesterday. I'll rebuild.