Add short-form macro for SArray construction

[cdsousa]

No description provided.

[mschauer]

Ref #24

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 93.368% when pulling 976722f on cdsousa:shortmacro into bb51021 on JuliaArrays:master.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #349 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #349      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.36%   93.36%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines        2713     2714       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2533     2534       +1     
  Misses        180      180

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/StaticArrays.jl	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
src/SArray.jl	97.26% <100%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bb51021...976722f. Read the comment docs.

[andyferris]

I think having a sort form is a good idea, works well with the spaceless macro format.

My only question is if this is short for the SArray type constructor, should it be @SA or @sa?

[cdsousa]

Actually I have no preference... I can change the code if people agree on something. `@SA` is closer to a type. `@sa` is closer to something that resembles a "custom literal macro" (as strings), and is visually lighter.

…

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:20 AM Andy Ferris ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** approved this pull request. I think having a sort form is a good idea, works well with the spaceless macro format. My only question is if this is short for the SArray type constructor, should it be @sa or @sa? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#349 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUWzyywUDgqA1p11laQWJmKpo53VP-Tks5tLZEtgaJpZM4Q6-RZ> .

[c42f]

Sorry this PR has languished :-(

However, I think we should close it in favor of a larger rethink of the constructor syntax in the StaticArrays-1.0 timeframe cf. #633 / #636 / #97