Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add predicate support for names and more tests #2417
add predicate support for names and more tests #2417
Changes from 5 commits
b487431
218ee21
5a02d3e
0c2d610
09464a3
fc66601
5a15791
ae7ea96
9a10dab
8c36ec0
7064c8b
c78eb3d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is good we have left some time to sleep over this PR.
The core question is (do not look at the implementation as it is just a consequence). If
eltype
of the column isMissing
and user passesunionmissing
equal totrue
what should happen then? The implementation was doing special casing of this case. Now I think ifCT === Missing
andunionmissing===true
then we should always returntrue
. Do you agree? (if yes - the above implementation will change)EDIT: Now that I have read my comment above I am again not so sure what is best ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The simplest and most obvious approach would be to check
ct <: Union{t, Missing}
whenunionmissing=true
. Otherwise things get too complex IMHO.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only problem is that if someone writes
names(df, Float64)
and has a column witheltype
equal toMissing
then one would get that column although it does not allowFloat64
values at all.