-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reserved identifier violation #422
Comments
Sure thing. |
JeffBezanson
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2012
StefanKarpinski
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2018
Revert function first finalizers due to ambiguities
ViralBShah
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 26, 2023
Stdlib: SparseArrays URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git Stdlib branch: main Julia branch: master Old commit: 99c99b4 New commit: 54f4b39 Julia version: 1.11.0-DEV SparseArrays version: 1.11.0 Bump invoked by: @ViralBShah Powered by: [BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl) Diff: JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@99c99b4...54f4b39 ``` $ git log --oneline 99c99b4..54f4b39 54f4b39 Fix docs conflict when building as part of full Julia docs (#430) a64ef4f Cleanup reloaded (#426) 4e2d1e4 Respect `IOContext` while displaying a `SparseMatrixCSC` (#423) 3d1eda9 Test suite: activate a temp project if we need to install Aqua.jl during the test suite (#425) 18b7fce Merge pull request #422 from JuliaSparse/jn/cat e2c78b8 test: restore ambiguous test 68afc6e fix inference of SparseVector cat c402d09 cat: ensure vararg is more inferrable 2c4f870 Fix some broken links (#421) 36a5308 bump version (#418) ``` Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
Keno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2023
These became visible when working on #37163. Most are not in a truly performance-critical path (though of course FrameCode optimization is not entirely uncritical, either), but one of them is.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I would like to point out that identifiers like "
_BUILTIN_PROTO_H_
" and "__HASHING_H_
" do not fit to the expected naming convention of the C language standard.Would you like to adjust your selection for unique names?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: