You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A. I noticed some packages that passed tests (e.g. Plots), on older version, that still had errors (yes, only for precompile, is it by design to not fail on that?).
B. And also packages that are ok, but failed on the previous version, and I'm not sure why, also what exact version is it referring to?
I expect it to work after Kristoffer reruns it (it had no precompile errors). What I find intriguing is the older version that did NOT fail, still with many precompile errors:
ERROR: The following 1 direct dependency failed to precompile:
Images [916415d5-f1e6-5110-898d-aaa5f9f070e0]
Failed to precompile Images [916415d5-f1e6-5110-898d-aaa5f9f070e0] to /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.9/Images/jl_YMGuJy.
ERROR: LoadError: UndefVarError: @_foldable_meta not defined
Stacktrace:
[1] include(mod::Module, _path::String)
[..]
ERROR: LoadError: Failed to precompile JLD2 [033835bb-8acc-5ee8-8aae-3f567f8a3819] to /home/pkgeval/.julia/compiled/v1.9/JLD2/jl_2TSnNN.
Stacktrace:
[1] error(s::String)
B.
E.g. FastTransforms did test ok (though with Broken yellow tests, I assume intentionally not failures), while on the older version there were failures e.g.:
Special functions: Test Failed at /home/pkgeval/.julia/packages/FastTransforms/xvEgx/test/specialfunctionstests.jl:31
Expression: norm((Λ.(x, λ₁, λ₂) .- Λ.(big.(x), big(λ₁), big(λ₂))) ./ Λ.(big.(x), big(λ₁), big(λ₂)), Inf) < 4 * eps()
Evaluated: 9.111009455283952578004582205091293326667462052583491936114275192978728268858538e-16 < 8.881784197001252e-16
This would normally worry me, should I not, since ok on the current version? There's a reason it failed, and then not, I'm just confused why such would happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A. I noticed some packages that passed tests (e.g. Plots), on older version, that still had errors (yes, only for precompile, is it by design to not fail on that?).
B. And also packages that are ok, but failed on the previous version, and I'm not sure why, also what exact version is it referring to?
#49302 (comment)
I'm guessing we should be most concerned with:
A.
Plots had a timeout:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/9aa7669_vs_7b39515/Plots.primary.log
I expect it to work after Kristoffer reruns it (it had no precompile errors). What I find intriguing is the older version that did NOT fail, still with many precompile errors:
B.
E.g. FastTransforms did test ok (though with Broken yellow tests, I assume intentionally not failures), while on the older version there were failures e.g.:
This would normally worry me, should I not, since ok on the current version? There's a reason it failed, and then not, I'm just confused why such would happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: