-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build fails on Ubuntu 11.10 #578
Comments
By using a different Make.inc, you can work around this - I had it using most of the system libraries, apart from LLVM (since 3.0 isn't packaged for 11.10), as well as ARPACK, which seems to conflict with libopal-dev, which I need on my system. These shouldn't really conflict, and I'll try to find out why, but the point is you can just edit your Make.inc to get it to build. Michael (who built Julia on his 11.10 laptop) :) |
Thanks for the reply. That said, I'm not certain what you --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Michael van der Kolff
|
I just noticed that you could have meant removing the reference to --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Hugh Myers hsmyers@gmail.com wrote:
|
I think what he meant was
|
OK, that is certainly do-able, I'll give it a shot... --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Keno Fischer
|
This may be a double post (I don't grok the lack of a 'post' button on git hub) This fails with: hsmyers@ubuntu: --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Hugh Myers hsmyers@gmail.com wrote:
|
you could either install the suitesparse-dev package (or something like that - I don't remember what it's called again) or just add |
make USE_SYSTEM_LLVM=0 USE_DEBIAN=1 USE_SYSTEM_SUITESPARSE=0 --hsm OK, it's not like I've got anything else to do :) --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Keno Fischer
|
chopped off to possibly pertinent lines: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llapack --hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Hugh Myers hsmyers@gmail.com wrote:
|
You need to have the appropriate -dev packages installed. Are they? I used the ARPACK that Julia downloads (so USE_SYSTEM_ARPACK=0), since Cheers, Michael On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:50 PM, hsmyers
|
No luck. After much app-getting, followed by a great deal of grinding, only to
libsuitesparse.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [sys0.ji] Error 1 ---hsm On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Michael van der Kolff
|
Possibly relevant; after the apt-get for libsuitesparse-dev it concludes with: Processing triggers for libc-bin ... with the (to me) possible sugestion that the libsuitesparse.so is not --hsm On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Hugh Myers hsmyers@gmail.com wrote:
|
I am working on a set of fixes for the library stuff that ought to fix this. |
Great! I'll try them out as soon as you give the go ahead. I ask that --hsm On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Viral B. Shah
|
Well since you closed the issue, I won't hear about it and will --hsm On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Viral B. Shah
|
What he's really saying is that he's deduplicating issues. Github's issue tracker isn't nearly as flexible as many others - I'm sure that will improve over time... Anyway, in the mean time, just subscribe to #353. It's much simpler than grumping about the way he manages what is fundamentally a tool for managing his work load... |
@hsmyers you can click on enable notifications on the other issue, so you will be notified once that's done |
@hsmyers Do turn on the notification as mentioned. Also, it is a bit troubling that your openblas build is failing. What CPU are you using? The openblas build issue is something that should be filed with the openblas git project. When I do fix #353, we will have a more general solution, but coming to think of it, you may not need to wait. In the meanwhile, can you install blas and lapack using apt-get (along with the dev packages) and then build julia with |
Also, if libsuitesparse is giving you trouble, can you comment out the libsuitesparse lines in sysimg.jl and start_image.jl and try? Is it fair to assume your BLAS problem is solved and you are only stuck at libsuitesparse? In order to fix the libsuitesparse issue, I have to fix #353. |
Will at some point try all of the above. As I remember it, there were --hsm On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Viral B. Shah
|
Bumps [actions/cache](https://github.com/actions/cache) from 1 to 3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/cache/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/main/RELEASES.md) - [Commits](actions/cache@v1...v3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/cache dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Stdlib: SparseArrays URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git Stdlib branch: main Julia branch: master Old commit: 0dd8d45 New commit: 14333ea Julia version: 1.12.0-DEV SparseArrays version: 1.12.0 Bump invoked by: @ViralBShah Powered by: [BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl) Diff: JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@0dd8d45...14333ea ``` $ git log --oneline 0dd8d45..14333ea 14333ea Break recursion (#579) 07cf4a6 Update ci.yml (#578) 33491e0 added diagonal-sparse multiplication (#564) 8f02b7f doc: move solvers doc to `src\solvers.md` (#576) 485fd4b Inline sparse-times-dense in-place multiplication (#567) f10d4da added specialized method for 3-argument dot with diagonal matrix (#565) 70c06b1 Diagonal-sandwiched triple product for SparseMatrixCSC (#562) 313a04f Change default QR tolerance to match SPQR (#557) 81d49e9 Update ci.yml (#558) ``` Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
Fails during what I presume is the 'testing' phase:
Warning: Rank mismatch in argument 'strue1' at (1) (scalar and rank-1)
Illegal instruction
make[4]: *** [level1] Error 132
make[3]: *** [tests] Error 2
make[2]: *** [openblas-v0.1alpha2.5/libopenblas.a] Error 2
make[1]: *** [julia-release] Error 2
make: *** [release] Error 2
This does not seem related to the library issue cautioned against as I already had the most current version of that installed.
--hsm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: