Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inlining's rewrite of _apply atypes #29324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2018
Merged

Fix inlining's rewrite of _apply atypes #29324

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2018

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Member

@Keno Keno commented Sep 22, 2018

Inlining incorrectly computed the new atypes for an _apply call,
leading to a cache miss and lack of inlining for call targets that
are worth inlining for the given constant arguments, but not necessarily
in general.

Inlining incorrectly computed the new atypes for an _apply call,
leading to a cache miss and lack of inlining for call targets that
are worth inlining for the given constant arguments, but not necessarily
in general.
@jrevels jrevels merged commit fa7d1a9 into master Sep 24, 2018
@jrevels
Copy link
Member

jrevels commented Sep 24, 2018

I'm secretly hoping that me properly rebasing on top of this will help in #28955 😛

@StefanKarpinski StefanKarpinski deleted the kf/inliningatypes branch September 24, 2018 21:16
@KristofferC
Copy link
Member

Can we run Nanosoldier first on these type of PRs?

@jrevels
Copy link
Member

jrevels commented Sep 26, 2018

Sorry, I should've done that. My bad.

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Dec 22, 2018

jrevels pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2018
Inlining incorrectly computed the new atypes for an _apply call,
leading to a cache miss and lack of inlining for call targets that
are worth inlining for the given constant arguments, but not necessarily
in general.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants