optimize more tuple splatting independent of length when possible #35930
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JeffBezanson
added
performance
vtjnash
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the heck of it, I tried to use
fill_to_lengthto create a constant tuple (Base.fill_to_length((),0x00,Val(160))), and to my surprise the generated code still contained a call to_apply_iterate. That was because the tuple exceeds MAX_TUPLE_SPLAT. That limit should perhaps be higher for inlining than for inference, but this is also an easy case we can optimize anyway.