Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #44328: method validation for opaque closures #44335

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

simeonschaub
Copy link
Member

I believe it's intentional that for these methods, the sig field is
just ignored and always set to Tuple. Also fixes a lowering bug I
discovered that would cause errors if Union was shadowed.

I have verified that this fixes the reported warnings.

@simeonschaub simeonschaub added backport 1.8 Change should be backported to release-1.8 bugfix This change fixes an existing bug labels Feb 24, 2022
@simeonschaub simeonschaub requested a review from Keno February 24, 2022 22:18
I believe it's intentional that for these methods, the `sig` field is
just ignored and always set to `Tuple`. Also fixes a lowering bug I
discovered that would cause errors if `Union` was shadowed.

I have verified that this fixes the reported warnings.
@timholy
Copy link
Member

timholy commented Feb 25, 2022

Just to check my understanding, you're suggesting it's a spurious warning?

@simeonschaub
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, exactly

@timholy timholy mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2022
47 tasks
src/julia-syntax.scm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Feb 28, 2022
@simeonschaub simeonschaub merged commit 5deb503 into master Mar 1, 2022
@simeonschaub simeonschaub deleted the sds/fix_44328 branch March 1, 2022 22:09
staticfloat pushed a commit to JuliaCI/julia-buildkite-testing that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
…#44335)

I believe it's intentional that for these methods, the `sig` field is
just ignored and always set to `Tuple`. Also fixes a lowering bug I
discovered that would cause errors if `Union` was shadowed.

I have verified that this fixes the reported warnings.

Co-authored-by: Jameson Nash <vtjnash@gmail.com>
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Mar 3, 2022
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
I believe it's intentional that for these methods, the `sig` field is
just ignored and always set to `Tuple`. Also fixes a lowering bug I
discovered that would cause errors if `Union` was shadowed.

I have verified that this fixes the reported warnings.

Co-authored-by: Jameson Nash <vtjnash@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5deb503)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
I believe it's intentional that for these methods, the `sig` field is
just ignored and always set to `Tuple`. Also fixes a lowering bug I
discovered that would cause errors if `Union` was shadowed.

I have verified that this fixes the reported warnings.

Co-authored-by: Jameson Nash <vtjnash@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5deb503)
@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.8 Change should be backported to release-1.8 label Mar 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix This change fixes an existing bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants