Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@nospecialize for Returns #44853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

chriselrod
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@chriselrod chriselrod changed the title @nospecialize for Returns @nospecialize for Returns Apr 4, 2022
@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit e9150a1 into JuliaLang:master Apr 5, 2022
@chriselrod chriselrod deleted the nospecializereturn branch April 5, 2022 03:56
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ struct Returns{V} <: Function
Returns(value) = new{Core.Typeof(value)}(value)
end

(obj::Returns)(args...; kw...) = obj.value
(obj::Returns)(@nospecialize(args...); @nospecialize(kw...)) = obj.value
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it make sense to allow f(_...; _...) in function definitions, i.e. repeat _ for both args and kwargs, and then insert automatically @nospecialize for _ arguments (if it's not already the case).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants