Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤖 [backports-release-1.10] Bump the SparseArrays stdlib from 279b363 to 8c84b8c #56431

Conversation

DilumAluthgeBot
Copy link
Contributor

Stdlib: SparseArrays
URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git
Stdlib branch: release-1.10
Julia branch: backports-release-1.10
Old commit: 279b363
New commit: 8c84b8c
Julia version: 1.10.6
SparseArrays version: 1.10.0(Does not match)
Bump invoked by: @IanButterworth
Powered by: BumpStdlibs.jl

Diff: JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@279b363...8c84b8c

$ git log --oneline 279b363..8c84b8c
8c84b8c Merge pull request #572 from JuliaSparse/backports-release-1.10
ec38631 Update ci.yml with more architectures
46c8f7e Merge branch 'release-1.10' into backports-release-1.10
2d762b3 Manual commit for PR #550 to backport to 1.10 (#577)
5c37298 Add versions to include arch
b539588 Update CI
fa49620 Disable nested dissection
d2a80a6 Change default QR tolerance to match SPQR (#557)
9b8cd14 SparseMatrixCSC constructor with a Tuple of Integers (#523)
546be18 Fix docs conflict when building as part of full Julia docs (#430)
30fbfc6 Test suite: activate a temp project if we need to install Aqua.jl during the test suite (#425)
91b0aa5 doc: move solvers doc to `src\solvers.md` (#576)
5d3724a Inline sparse-times-dense in-place multiplication

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

@dkarrasch for bumps like this we typically merge them into the backports branch before CI has completed, as it will be run over there, but given I'm unfamiliar with this, I'll let you decide whether to merge early.

@IanButterworth IanButterworth mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
47 tasks
@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Thanks @IanButterworth! This has horrible (seemingly unrelated to SparseArrays.jl) build and CI failures. I repeated some of the runs, let's see how it goes. Maybe somebody needs to take a look.

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

I haven't looked in detail but I assume it's the same issues as on #56381

You could wait for them to be fixed or merge now.

@dkarrasch dkarrasch merged commit 5549ee2 into JuliaLang:backports-release-1.10 Nov 4, 2024
1 of 5 checks passed
@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Let's keep things together in one place and track and fix them there. Thank you for your help!

N5N3 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
8c84b8c (#56431)

Stdlib: SparseArrays
URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git
Stdlib branch: release-1.10
Julia branch: backports-release-1.10
Old commit: 279b363
New commit: 8c84b8c
Julia version: 1.10.6
SparseArrays version: 1.10.0(Does not match)
Bump invoked by: @IanButterworth
Powered by:
[BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl)

Diff:
JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@279b363...8c84b8c

```
$ git log --oneline 279b363..8c84b8c
8c84b8c Merge pull request #572 from JuliaSparse/backports-release-1.10
ec38631 Update ci.yml with more architectures
46c8f7e Merge branch 'release-1.10' into backports-release-1.10
2d762b3 Manual commit for PR #550 to backport to 1.10 (#577)
5c37298 Add versions to include arch
b539588 Update CI
fa49620 Disable nested dissection
d2a80a6 Change default QR tolerance to match SPQR (#557)
9b8cd14 SparseMatrixCSC constructor with a Tuple of Integers (#523)
546be18 Fix docs conflict when building as part of full Julia docs (#430)
30fbfc6 Test suite: activate a temp project if we need to install Aqua.jl during the test suite (#425)
91b0aa5 doc: move solvers doc to `src\solvers.md` (#576)
5d3724a Inline sparse-times-dense in-place multiplication
```

Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the BumpStdlibs/SparseArrays-8c84b8c-backports-release-1.10 branch December 16, 2024 00:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants