-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New package: Fortran90Namelists v0.1.0 #116638
New package: Fortran90Namelists v0.1.0 #116638
Conversation
JuliaRegistrator
commented
Oct 5, 2024
- Registering package: Fortran90Namelists
- Repository: https://github.com/anchal-physics/Fortran90Namelists.jl
- Created by: @anchal-physics
- Version: v0.1.0
- Commit: cd0bbfd96a4bab8230259ee310766838f05eb701
- Reviewed by: @anchal-physics
- Reference: anchal-physics/FortranNamelistParser.jl@cd0bbfd#commitcomment-147598934
- Description: A pure Julia implementation of Python f90nml package.
UUID: 8fb689aa-71ff-4044-8071-0cffc910b57d Repo: https://github.com/anchal-physics/Fortran90Namelists.jl.git Tree: 31dbc52282ad367dc807d4f242825d52a56abec2 Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human. 1. New package registrationPlease make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines. 2. AutoMerge Guidelines which are not met ❌
3. Needs action: here's what to do next
If you need help fixing the AutoMerge issues, or want your pull request to be manually merged instead, please post a comment explaining what you need help with or why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the 4. To pause or stop registrationIf you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add |
[noblock] Requesting override of package name similarity. This package is indeed supposed to provide same functionality as |
Hi @anchal-physics, I really appreciate the work you've done in forking and modifying I wanted to ask if you'd consider giving your fork a different name. The main reason is that I may implement a new version of the parser with some structural changes in the future, and I’d like to keep the original name available for that. Additionally, since your package is intended to be minimally maintained, a new name would help distinguish between our versions and avoid any potential confusion for users. One suggestion could be |
@singularitti Thanks for your comment and suggestion. I agree with you and will wait for your improved |
That's great! Thank you! @anchal-physics |