-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document support for special terms at run-time, one-sided formula #155
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #155 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.66% 83.66%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 496 496
=======================================
Hits 415 415
Misses 81 81
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
docs/src/internals.md
Outdated
``` | ||
|
||
This is workable if a little verbose, so the third (optional) step is to provide | ||
additional "runtime" methods for the function that's used in the `@formula` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
additional "runtime" methods for the function that's used in the `@formula` | |
additional "runtime" methods for the function that are used in the `@formula` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"function" is the head of this relative clause so single number is appropriate no? That is, it's the function that's used, not the methods...although now I see that this is potentially structurally ambiguous :)
c39a5db
to
32c43e7
Compare
This adds some notes in the documentation for package developers about supporting run-time use of special terms, expanding on a short comment from slack with @Nosferican. It also updates the
poly
/PolyTerm
example to follow the revised guidelines.