Increase Tundra orbit periapsis requirement #2375
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With a 1000 km periapsis (eccentricity 0.82), the resulting orbit has barely any apogee dwell time; it moves west very quickly across the sky when it's at apogee.
At an eccentricity of 0.423, the ground track moves from being a figure-of-eight to a teardrop shape. Higher eccentricities make the ground track more of an oblong shape. An eccentricity of 0.423 gives a periapsis altitude of 17958 km; I've rounded it down to 17000 km to give a quite lot of margin.
Also decreased the minimum eccentricity a little bit. According to Capderou's "Handbook of Satellite Orbits", a 0.2668 eccentricity Tundra orbit was considered for ESA's "Archimedes" telecommunications project, giving an 8 hour visibility window per orbit. The new minimum of 0.25 is a little below that value.
Examples of Tundra orbits of varying eccentricity, with a waypoint at 63° latitude and a range of 3000 km:
Implements #2373