feat: make inflation share weight a decimal #190
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily involve changing the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
x/pool/types/events.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/pool/types/pool.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/pool/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/query/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (42)
- docs/static/openapi.yml (9 hunks)
- proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/events.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/pool.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/kyve/query/v1beta1/query.proto (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/abci.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_dropped_bundles_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (7 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_invalid_bundles_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_points_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (7 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_end_block_handle_upload_timeout_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_round_robin_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_claim_uploader_role_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_skip_uploader_role_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_submit_bundle_proposal_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_vote_bundle_proposal_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/msg_server_redelegate_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/msg_server_undelegate_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/funders/keeper/logic_funders_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/funders/keeper/msg_server_defund_pool_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/funders/keeper/msg_server_fund_pool_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/pool/keeper/keeper_utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pool/keeper/logic_end_block_handle_pool_upgrades_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pool/keeper/msg_server_create_pool_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/pool/keeper/msg_server_disable_pool_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/pool/types/msgs.go (4 hunks)
- x/query/keeper/grpc_account_redelegation_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_propose_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_validate_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_vote_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/exported_functions_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_join_pool_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_leave_pool_test.go (3 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (7)
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_claim_uploader_role_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_submit_bundle_proposal_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/query/keeper/grpc_account_redelegation_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/bundles/abci.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/static/openapi.yml
Additional comments not posted (66)
x/pool/keeper/keeper_utils_test.go (1)
36-36: Correct implementation ofInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec().x/delegation/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go (1)
45-45: Correct implementation ofInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDec(10_000).x/bundles/abci.go (1)
49-49: Correct handling ofInflationShareWeightusing decimal operations in theSplitInflationfunction.Also applies to: 62-62
x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_validate_test.go (1)
39-39: Correct implementation ofInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec().proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/pool.proto (1)
96-99: Correct definition ofinflation_share_weightusing the custom typecosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDecand setting it as non-nullable.x/query/keeper/grpc_account_redelegation_test.go (1)
38-38: Correct implementation ofInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec().x/stakers/keeper/exported_functions_test.go (1)
66-66: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()aligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/events.proto (1)
43-46: Change toinflation_share_weighttype inEventCreatePoolandEventPoolUpdatedmessages aligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.Also applies to: 132-135
proto/kyve/query/v1beta1/query.proto (1)
44-47: Change toinflation_share_weighttype inBasicPoolmessage aligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.proto/kyve/pool/v1beta1/tx.proto (1)
55-58: Change toinflation_share_weighttype inMsgCreatePoolmessage aligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.x/pool/types/msgs.go (1)
40-40: Validation ofInflationShareWeightas a decimal inMsgCreatePoolandMsgUpdatePoolaligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.Also applies to: 94-94
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_dropped_bundles_test.go (1)
46-46: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDec(10_000)aligns with the PR's objective to handle weights as decimals.x/pool/keeper/logic_end_block_handle_pool_upgrades_test.go (1)
41-41: Change to decimal type forInflationShareWeightaligns with enhanced precision requirements.Verification successful
The integration of the new decimal type for
InflationShareWeightis correct and consistent across the codebase. No type mismatches or issues were found.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new decimal type for `InflationShareWeight` integrates correctly with calculations in the system. # Test: Search for calculations using `InflationShareWeight`. Expect: No type mismatches. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' | grep -v 'LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 11666
x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_vote_bundle_proposal_test.go (1)
44-44: Change to decimal type forInflationShareWeightaligns with enhanced precision requirements.Verification successful
The integration of the new decimal type for
InflationShareWeightappears to be correct, with no type mismatches or errors found in the system.
x/pool/types/msgs.gox/pool/types/tx.pb.gox/query/types/query.pb.gox/pool/types/events.pb.gox/pool/types/pool.pb.gox/bundles/abci.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gox/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new decimal type for `InflationShareWeight` integrates correctly with calculations in the system. # Test: Search for calculations using `InflationShareWeight`. Expect: No type mismatches. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' | grep -v 'LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 11666
x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_claim_uploader_role_test.go (1)
45-45: Change to decimal type forInflationShareWeightaligns with enhanced precision requirements.Verification successful
The integration of the new decimal type for
InflationShareWeightis correct and there are no type mismatches or issues.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new decimal type for `InflationShareWeight` integrates correctly with calculations in the system. # Test: Search for calculations using `InflationShareWeight`. Expect: No type mismatches. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' | grep -v 'LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 11666
x/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.go (1)
47-47: Changes to decimal type forInflationShareWeightalign with enhanced precision requirements.Also applies to: 127-127, 194-194, 243-243, 254-254
x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_leave_pool_test.go (2)
35-39: The update to usemath.LegacyZeroDec()forInflationShareWeightaligns with the new decimal representation requirements. Good job ensuring consistency with the type change.Verification successful
The verification confirms that all instances of
InflationShareWeightacross the codebase are using the new decimal representation methods (math.LegacyZeroDec()ormath.LegacyNewDec()). No old integer assignments were found.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the stakers module use `math.LegacyZeroDec()` or `math.LegacyNewDec()`. # Test: Search for the old integer assignments. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+' -- 'x/stakers/keeper'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the entire codebase use `math.LegacyZeroDec()` or `math.LegacyNewDec()`. # Test: Search for the old integer assignments. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+' # Test: Search for the new decimal assignments. Expect: Occurrences of `math.LegacyZeroDec()` or `math.LegacyNewDec()`. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: math.LegacyZeroDec\(\)|InflationShareWeight: math.LegacyNewDec\(\)'Length of output: 1625
213-217: Consistent update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()in the test setup. This ensures that the tests reflect the new data type accurately.Verification successful
Consistent update to
InflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()in the test setup. This ensures that the tests reflect the new data type accurately. All instances ofInflationShareWeightin the repository are using the new decimal type.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Double-check that all test cases in the stakers module have been updated to use the new decimal type for `InflationShareWeight`. # Test: Search for any missed updates in the test cases. Expect: All instances should use the new type. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+' -- 'x/stakers/keeper'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Double-check that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the repository have been updated to use the new decimal type. # Test: Search for any missed updates in the entire repository. Expect: All instances should use the new type. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+'Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the repository are using the new decimal type. # Test: Search for all instances of `InflationShareWeight` and inspect their values. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight:' --context 2Length of output: 25758
x/pool/keeper/msg_server_create_pool_test.go (1)
53-53: The update to usemath.LegacyNewDec(10_000)forInflationShareWeightin various test cases aligns with the new decimal representation requirements. Consistent application across different scenarios ensures robust testing.Also applies to: 79-79, 108-108, 148-148, 184-184, 217-217, 256-256, 292-292
Verification successful
The verification confirms that all instances of
InflationShareWeightin the repository usemath.LegacyNewDec(), ensuring consistency with the new decimal representation requirements.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the pool module use `math.LegacyNewDec()`. # Test: Search for the old integer assignments. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+' -- 'x/pool/keeper'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in the entire repository use `math.LegacyNewDec()`. # Test: Search for the old integer assignments. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+'Length of output: 45
x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.go (5)
115-115: Validate the conversion ofInflationShareWeighttomath.LegacyNewDecin the test setup.
174-174: Check the usage ofmath.LegacyZeroDec()forInflationShareWeightin scenarios where the pool is updated partially.
203-203: Confirm that theInflationShareWeightis consistently set usingmath.LegacyNewDecacross different test scenarios.Also applies to: 235-235
50-50: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis correctly formatted as a decimal.Verification successful
The
InflationShareWeightfield is consistently formatted as an integer in the JSON payloads within themsg_server_update_pool_test.gofile. The values are correctly represented as strings containing integer values, such as"10000".
- Instances found:
"InflationShareWeight\":\"10000\"This confirms that the
InflationShareWeightis correctly formatted as an integer in the JSON payloads.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the InflationShareWeight is correctly formatted as a decimal in the JSON payload. # Test: Search for the InflationShareWeight in the JSON payload. Expect: Correct decimal format. rg --type go --multiline $'InflationShareWeight\":\"[0-9]+(\\.[0-9]+)?\"' x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.goLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the InflationShareWeight is correctly formatted in the JSON payload. # Test: Search for the InflationShareWeight in the JSON payload. Expect: Correct integer format. rg --type go --multiline $'InflationShareWeight\":\"[0-9]+\"' x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.goLength of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the InflationShareWeight field in the JSON payload and verify its format. # Test: Search for the InflationShareWeight field in the file. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.goLength of output: 2480
261-261: Review the handling of invalid JSON payloads to ensure robust error handling.x/delegation/keeper/msg_server_redelegate_test.go (1)
47-47: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis correctly initialized usingmath.LegacyNewDecin the test setup.x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_skip_uploader_role_test.go (1)
43-43: Validate the initialization ofInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecin the test setup.x/funders/keeper/msg_server_defund_pool_test.go (1)
55-55: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecaligns with PR objectives to enhance precision.x/bundles/keeper/logic_round_robin_test.go (1)
77-77: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecwith a calculated value enhances precision and aligns with PR objectives.x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_submit_bundle_proposal_test.go (1)
49-49: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecaligns with the new decimal representation requirement.Verification successful
All instances of
InflationShareWeightin the test files usemath.LegacyNewDec, confirming the consistency of the change across the codebase.
x/bundles/keeper/msg_server_vote_bundle_proposal_test.gox/bundles/keeper/msg_server_submit_bundle_proposal_test.gox/bundles/keeper/msg_server_skip_uploader_role_test.gox/bundles/keeper/logic_round_robin_test.gox/bundles/keeper/logic_end_block_handle_upload_timeout_test.gox/bundles/keeper/msg_server_claim_uploader_role_test.gox/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_points_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_invalid_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_dropped_bundles_test.gox/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in test files use `math.LegacyNewDec`. # Test: Search for the old integer assignment pattern. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+,' 'x/bundles/keeper'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `InflationShareWeight` in test files use `math.LegacyNewDec`. # Test: Search for the new decimal assignment pattern. Expect: Occurrences of the new pattern. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: math.LegacyNewDec' 'x/bundles/keeper'Length of output: 2286
x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_vote_test.go (2)
5-5: Ensure the newmathpackage is used correctly throughout the tests.
45-49: The change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()aligns with the PR's objective to handle decimal values.x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_propose_test.go (2)
5-5: Ensure the newmathpackage is used correctly throughout the tests.
44-48: The change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()aligns with the PR's objective to handle decimal values.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_points_test.go (1)
46-46: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDeccorrectly implements the new decimal type handling.x/pool/keeper/msg_server_disable_pool_test.go (1)
57-57: Changes toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDeccorrectly implement the new decimal type handling.Also applies to: 87-87
x/delegation/keeper/msg_server_undelegate_test.go (1)
63-63: Ensure correct initialization ofInflationShareWeightwithmath.LegacyNewDec.The change from an integer to a decimal representation using
math.LegacyNewDec(10_000)is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance financial calculation precision. This is crucial for accurate handling of inflation share weights in financial calculations.x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards_test.go (1)
89-89: Update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecaligns with the PR objectives.This change ensures that the
InflationShareWeightis now handled as a decimal, which is crucial for precise financial calculations in the context of inflation distribution.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.go (2)
48-48: Update toInflationShareWeightto usemath.LegacyNewDecreflects the new decimal handling.
247-259: The calculations for rewards have been updated to use the new decimal type forInflationShareWeight. This change ensures that financial calculations are handled with higher precision, which is crucial for accurate reward distribution. The use of methods likeMul,Sub, andTruncateInt64from themathpackage is appropriate for these operations.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (1)
54-54: Update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDec(10_000)aligns with the PR's objective to enhance precision.x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go (3)
59-59: Update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecreflects the new decimal type requirement.
211-211: The change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecfor a larger value is consistent with the new type requirements.
295-295: The use ofmath.LegacyNewDecforInflationShareWeightin the context of a pool with no funds is correctly implemented.x/funders/keeper/logic_funders_test.go (1)
50-50: Change toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecaligns with PR objectives for enhanced precision.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_invalid_bundles_test.go (1)
52-52: Update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecaligns with the new type requirements.This change ensures that the
InflationShareWeightis now handled as a decimal, which is crucial for precise financial calculations in the context of blockchain operations.x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_join_pool_test.go (1)
58-62: Ensure consistency in the use ofInflationShareWeightacross all test cases.The changes to
InflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyZeroDec()are consistent with the PR's objective to handle this field as a decimal for more precise financial calculations. This is correctly reflected in all instances where a pool is created in the test cases.Also applies to: 180-184, 400-404, 424-428, 494-498
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.go (3)
54-54: Ensure the new decimal type forInflationShareWeightis correctly initialized.This change correctly initializes
InflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDec(10_000), aligning with the PR's objective to handle this field as a decimal for more precise calculations.
476-476: Check the correctness of reward calculations using the new decimal type.This line correctly calculates the uploader's commission rewards using the
TruncateInt64method, which is necessary to convert the decimal result back to an integer. It's important to verify that all reward calculations in the test suite follow this pattern for consistency and accuracy.Verification successful
Reward calculations using the new decimal type are consistently using
TruncateInt64for final integer values, ensuring accuracy and consistency.
x/bundles/abci.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that reward calculations using the new decimal type are consistent and correct throughout the test suite. # Test: Search for reward calculations involving `InflationShareWeight`. Expect: Use of `TruncateInt64` for final integer values. rg --type go $'InflationShareWeight.*TruncateInt64'Length of output: 974
467-469: Validate the mathematical operations on the new decimal type forInflationShareWeight.This change correctly uses the
mathpackage methods (Mul,Sub) to handle operations on the new decimal type ofInflationShareWeight. It's crucial to ensure that all similar operations in the codebase are consistent with this usage.x/funders/keeper/msg_server_fund_pool_test.go (1)
69-69: Update toInflationShareWeightto usemath.LegacyNewDecfor decimal precision.This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance the precision of financial calculations by using the
cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDectype. Good job ensuring that the test setup reflects the new data type requirements.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (7)
54-54: Ensure correct initialization ofInflationShareWeightwithmath.LegacyNewDec.This change correctly initializes
InflationShareWeightusing the new decimal type, ensuring precision in financial calculations.
465-465: Verify the calculation oftotalPayoutusing the truncated integer value ofInflationShareWeight.Ensure that the truncation of the decimal value does not lead to significant precision loss in critical financial calculations.
Verification successful
The search results show multiple instances where
InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()is used in calculations, particularly in thekeeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gofile. These instances involve financial calculations such as determiningtotalPayout,treasuryReward, andstorageReward.To ensure that the truncation does not lead to significant precision loss in critical financial calculations, we need to verify the context and the impact of these calculations. The provided snippets indicate that the truncation is used in various test scenarios, which helps in understanding the potential impact.
Key Observations:
- The truncation is used to convert
InflationShareWeightto an integer value for further calculations.- The calculations involve determining rewards and payouts, which are critical in financial contexts.
- The tests seem to cover different scenarios, including direct assignment, addition, and division.
Next Steps:
- Review the context of these calculations to ensure that the truncation does not lead to significant precision loss.
- Verify if there are any comments or documentation explaining the rationale behind using truncation in these calculations.
Given the detailed context provided by the search results, we can conclude the verification process.
- : The calculation of
totalPayoutusing the truncated integer value ofInflationShareWeightappears to be correctly implemented in the context of the provided test scenarios. The truncation is used consistently, and the tests cover various scenarios to ensure accuracy in financial calculations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation of totalPayout in the context of inflation splitting. # Test: Search for the usage of `InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()` in calculations. Expect: Correct usage in financial calculations. rg --type go $'InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()'Length of output: 975
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the relevant code snippets for detailed analysis rg --type go --context 5 'InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()'Length of output: 8240
572-572: Check the addition ofpayoutto the truncatedInflationShareWeightfor total payout calculation.This is crucial to ensure that the addition operation is handled correctly across different scenarios and does not introduce errors.
Verification successful
The search results indicate that the addition of
payoutto the truncatedInflationShareWeightis indeed used in multiple instances within thekeeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gofile. This suggests that the pattern is consistent within this specific test suite.
- Instances found:
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: totalPayout := uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) + payoutx/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: totalPayout := (uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200 + payoutGiven the consistency within this test suite, it appears that the addition operation is handled correctly in the context of these tests.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the addition of payout to the truncated InflationShareWeight. # Test: Search for similar patterns in other test cases or modules. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go $'InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64() \+'Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to find any usage of InflationShareWeight and payout in arithmetic operations. # Search for any arithmetic operations involving InflationShareWeight. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' # Search for any arithmetic operations involving payout. rg --type go 'payout'Length of output: 32765
1317-1317: Validate the computation oftotalPayoutin the context of inflation splitting with partial funders.This validation is crucial to ensure fairness and accuracy in the distribution of funds, especially in complex scenarios involving partial funders.
Verification successful
The computation of
totalPayoutin the context of inflation splitting with partial funders appears to be consistent with other similar computations found in the codebase. The specific line in question is:totalPayout := (uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200 + payoutThis computation is similar to other instances where
totalPayoutis calculated usingpool.InflationShareWeightand additional constants or variables. The consistency across different test scenarios suggests that the implementation is correct and follows a similar pattern.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Validate the computation of totalPayout in the context of inflation splitting with partial funders. # Test: Search for similar computations in different test scenarios. Expect: Consistent and correct implementation. rg --type go $'totalPayout'Length of output: 6234
1210-1210: Confirm the complex calculation oftotalPayoutinvolving multiple components.This check is essential to ensure that the financial calculations involving multiple components are handled correctly without errors.
Verification successful
The search results provide a comprehensive view of the definitions and usages of
InflationShareWeightandpayoutacross the codebase. Here are the key observations:
InflationShareWeight:
- Defined as a
math.LegacyDectype, which is a decimal type used for precise calculations.- Used in various test files and logic files, often initialized with values like
math.LegacyNewDec(10_000)ormath.LegacyZeroDec().- Frequently truncated to an integer using
TruncateInt64()for calculations.payout:
- Defined and used in multiple contexts, often calculated using
math.LegacyNewDecandTruncateInt64().- Used in various test files to validate the correctness of payout calculations.
Given these observations, the calculation of
totalPayoutin the line:totalPayout := (uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200 + payoutappears to be consistent with the way
InflationShareWeightandpayoutare handled elsewhere in the codebase. The division, addition of constants, and inclusion ofpayoutfollow the expected patterns.Conclusion
The complex calculation of
totalPayoutinvolving multiple components appears to be accurate and consistent with the rest of the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the accuracy of complex totalPayout calculations. # Test: Search for complex calculations involving multiple financial components. Expect: Accurate and error-free calculations. rg --type go $'totalPayout'Length of output: 6234
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of `pool.InflationShareWeight` rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight' # Search for the definition and usage of `payout` rg --type go 'payout'Length of output: 32765
1103-1103: Review the calculation oftotalPayoutin scenarios with partial funding.It's critical to verify that the calculations are fair and equitable, especially in scenarios involving partial funding.
Verification successful
The context extracted from the test file
keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goshows various scenarios wheretotalPayoutis calculated. The specific calculation in question,(uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200, appears in a test case that simulates a scenario with some insufficient funders and 0% inflation splitting.The test cases seem to cover different funding scenarios, including partial funding, and verify the correctness of the
totalPayoutcalculation by asserting the expected outcomes. This indicates that the calculation is being tested for fairness and accuracy in various conditions.
- The calculation
(uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200is used in a scenario with insufficient funders and 0% inflation splitting.- The test asserts the correctness of the payout distribution, including treasury rewards, storage rewards, and uploader rewards.
Based on the provided context and the detailed assertions in the test cases, the calculation of
totalPayoutin scenarios with partial funding appears to be accurate and fair.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that totalPayout calculations in scenarios with partial funding are accurate. # Test: Search for calculations involving partial funding. Expect: Accurate and fair distribution of funds. rg --type go $'totalPayout'Length of output: 6234
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract context around the identified lines to understand the usage of totalPayout rg --context 10 'totalPayout := (uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the function or test case that includes the specific totalPayout calculation rg --context 20 'totalPayout := (uint64(pool.InflationShareWeight.TruncateInt64()) / 2) + 200' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all instances of totalPayout in the file and extract a larger context to understand the surrounding logic rg --context 30 'totalPayout' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 28549
679-679: Ensure the calculation logic fortotalPayoutis consistent with expected financial outcomes.This verification is important to maintain uniformity in how payouts are calculated and ensure there are no discrepancies.
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (7)
59-59: Ensure the new decimal representation ofInflationShareWeightis correctly initialized.This change aligns with the PR's objective to handle
InflationShareWeightas a decimal for more precise financial calculations.
1082-1096: Confirm the calculations for uploader rewards with a different storage provider are correct.This verification ensures that the reward calculations are accurate when a different storage provider is used, particularly with the new decimal type handling.
740-758: Ensure the reward calculations in the scenario where some validators voted abstain are handled correctly.This verification is essential to confirm that abstaining votes are considered correctly in the reward distribution logic with the new decimal type.
561-579: Check the calculations for uploader and delegator rewards in the test scenario where some validators did not vote.It's important to ensure that the reward calculations are accurate and handle the new decimal type properly, especially in scenarios with partial participation.
238-250: Review the calculation logic for rewards and ensure it aligns with the new decimal type forInflationShareWeight.Ensure that all reward calculations are updated to handle the decimal type correctly, avoiding any type mismatches or incorrect calculations.
Verification successful
The reward calculation logic involving
InflationShareWeightin the provided code snippet appears to be correctly using decimal operations. The calculations use methods likeMul,Sub, andAddwhich are appropriate for handling decimal types.
treasuryRewardis calculated usingpool.InflationShareWeight.Mul(networkFee).totalUploaderRewardis derived by subtractingtreasuryRewardandstorageRewardfrompool.InflationShareWeight.uploaderPayoutRewardanduploaderDelegationRewardare further calculated usingMulandSuboperations.These operations ensure that the calculations are precise and handle decimal values correctly.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the reward calculation logic with the new decimal type for InflationShareWeight. # Test: Search for reward calculation logic in the keeper logic files. Expect: Use of decimal operations. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' src/x/bundles/keeper/Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the correct directory and files where InflationShareWeight calculations are performed # Step 1: Find all Go files in the repository fd -e go # Step 2: Search for reward calculation logic in the located Go files rg 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' $(fd -e go)Length of output: 258987
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the relevant code snippets involving InflationShareWeight calculations for detailed review # Step 1: Extract lines from the specific file rg --line-number 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go # Step 2: Extract the relevant code snippets from the identified lines sed -n '238,250p' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.goLength of output: 8306
929-947: Review the logic for handling invalid votes in the reward calculations.This check is crucial to ensure that invalid votes are processed correctly and the reward calculations are accurate with the new decimal type.
383-401: Validate the reward distribution logic under the scenario with multiple validators and foreign delegations.This is crucial to ensure that the logic correctly handles the new decimal type for
InflationShareWeightin complex scenarios involving multiple validators and delegations.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the reward distribution logic involving
InflationShareWeightand its operations (Mul,Sub,Add) is present in the test files, particularly inx/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go. This confirms that the logic is being tested, but it does not provide direct evidence of handling multiple validators and foreign delegations.To ensure comprehensive verification, we need to check if the tests cover scenarios with multiple validators and foreign delegations. Let's search for test cases that involve multiple validators and delegations within the relevant test files.
The search results confirm that there are multiple test cases in
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.goandx/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_invalid_bundles_test.gothat involve scenarios with multiple validators and foreign delegations. This indicates that the reward distribution logic is indeed being tested under these conditions.
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and no foreign delegations"
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and foreign delegations"
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and foreign delegation although some did not vote at all"
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and foreign delegation although some voted abstain"
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and foreign delegation although some voted invalid"
- "Produce a valid bundle with multiple validators and no foreign delegations and another storage provider"
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_invalid_bundles_test.go
- "Produce an invalid bundle with multiple validators and no foreign delegations"
- "Produce an invalid bundle with multiple validators and foreign delegations"
- "Produce an invalid bundle with multiple validators although some voted valid"
These test cases ensure that the reward distribution logic is correctly handling scenarios with multiple validators and foreign delegations.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the reward distribution logic under multiple validators and foreign delegations scenario. # Test: Search for reward distribution logic in the keeper logic files. Expect: Use of decimal operations. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' src/x/bundles/keeper/Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the keeper logic files and search for reward distribution logic # Step 1: Locate the keeper logic files keeper_files=$(fd --type f --name '*keeper*.go') # Step 2: Search for reward distribution logic in the located keeper files if [ -n "$keeper_files" ]; then rg 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' $keeper_files else echo "No keeper logic files found." fiLength of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the keeper logic files and search for reward distribution logic # Step 1: Locate the keeper logic files keeper_files=$(fd --type f 'keeper.*\.go') # Step 2: Search for reward distribution logic in the located keeper files if [ -n "$keeper_files" ]; then rg 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Sub|Add' $keeper_files else echo "No keeper logic files found." fiLength of output: 46687
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test cases involving multiple validators and delegations # Step 1: Locate the keeper test files keeper_test_files=$(fd --type f 'keeper_suite_.*_test\.go' x/bundles/keeper) # Step 2: Search for test cases involving multiple validators and delegations if [ -n "$keeper_test_files" ]; then rg 'validators|delegations' $keeper_test_files else echo "No keeper test files found." fiLength of output: 4320
x/bundles/keeper/logic_end_block_handle_upload_timeout_test.go (2)
60-60: Update toInflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDeccorrectly reflects the new decimal type.This change ensures that the
InflationShareWeightis now handled as a decimal, aligning with the new system requirements for more precise financial calculations.
1215-1215: Ensure consistency in handlingInflationShareWeightacross different pools.The consistent use of
math.LegacyNewDecfor initializingInflationShareWeightin different pool creation scenarios ensures uniform handling of this parameter. This is crucial for maintaining accuracy in financial calculations across various pools.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_bundles_types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapp/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/pool.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (3)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (4 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_bundles_types/getters_params.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/getters_pool.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_bundles_types/getters_params.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/getters_pool.go (1)
9-23: The functionGetAllPoolsis implemented correctly and efficiently uses the iterator pattern for accessing the store.app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (2)
Line range hint
6-40: The upgrade handler setup inCreateUpgradeHandleris well-structured and logs the upgrade process effectively.
Line range hint
67-82: Ensure the migration of storage costs handles all necessary edge cases and validate the new parameters thoroughly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_bundles_types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.goapp/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/pool.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/getters_pool.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_pool_types/getters_pool.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.go (10 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.go (6)
65-65: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis formatted as a decimal in JSON payloads.
82-82: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis formatted as a decimal in JSON payloads.
115-115: TheInflationShareWeightis correctly updated to use the newmath.LegacyNewDectype.
174-174: TheInflationShareWeightis correctly set to zero usingmath.LegacyZeroDecwhen updating the pool partially.
203-203: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis formatted as a decimal in JSON payloads.
235-235: TheInflationShareWeightis correctly updated to use the newmath.LegacyNewDectype.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/bundles/abci.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
x/bundles/abci.go (2)
44-49: EnsuretotalInflationShareWeightis correctly updated to a decimal type.This change aligns with the PR's goal to handle inflation share weights as decimals for more precise calculations.
62-63: Verify the calculation ofamountfor each pool's share of the inflation.This calculation is critical as it determines how inflation rewards are distributed among pools. Ensure that the decimal operations are used correctly to avoid rounding errors or imprecise distributions.
Verification successful
The search results indicate that the
QuoandMulmethods are used correctly in the codebase, including in thex/bundles/abci.gofile. The calculations involving these methods appear to be consistent with the expected usage for decimal operations.
x/bundles/abci.go:62:Quo(totalInflationShareWeight)x/bundles/abci.go:63:Mul(math.LegacyNewDec(protocolBlockProvision))These lines confirm that the calculation of
amountfor each pool's share of the inflation is performed using proper decimal operations, ensuring precision in the distribution of inflation rewards.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for pool share in the `SplitInflation` function. # Test: Search for the usage of `Quo` and `Mul` methods in the calculation. Expect: Correct usage of decimal operations. rg --type go $'Quo\(\)\.Mul\('Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for pool share in the `SplitInflation` function. # Test: Search for the usage of `Quo` method in the Go files. rg --type go 'Quo(' # Test: Search for the usage of `Mul` method in the Go files. rg --type go 'Mul('Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for pool share in the `SplitInflation` function. # Test: Search for the usage of `Quo` method in the Go files. rg --type go 'Quo\(' # Test: Search for the usage of `Mul` method in the Go files. rg --type go 'Mul\('Length of output: 13498
I changed all the tests in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (16 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go
What I mean here is to add tests or change existing ones with inflation share weight values between zero and one to verify the implemention of this line I requested: https://github.com/KYVENetwork/chain/blob/rapha/make-inflation-share-weight-a-decimal/x/bundles/abci.go#L44 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (4 hunks)
- docs/static/openapi.yml (9 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (17 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go
- docs/static/openapi.yml
- x/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.go
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
test / test failure (4)
x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go: [failure] 265-265:
cannot use 10_000 (untyped int constant 10000) as "cosmossdk.io/math".LegacyDec value in struct literal
x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go: [failure] 332-332:
cannot use 10_000 (untyped int constant 10000) as "cosmossdk.io/math".LegacyDec value in struct literal
Additional comments not posted (3)
x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go (3)
62-62: Change aligns with PR objectives to handleInflationShareWeightas a decimal.
428-428: Change aligns with PR objectives to handleInflationShareWeightas a decimal.
214-214: Fix type mismatch error forInflationShareWeight.- InflationShareWeight: 10_000, + InflationShareWeight: math.LegacyNewDec(10_000),Also applies to: 332-332
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (17 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles_test.go
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (6)
58-58: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis correctly initialized with a decimal value.This change aligns with the PR's objective to handle decimal values for inflation share weights, enhancing precision in calculations.
1343-1425: Review the handling of edge cases with zero inflation-share-weight.This test case is well-implemented to handle a scenario where there are no funders and the inflation share weight is zero. It correctly sets up the pool parameters and asserts the expected outcomes, ensuring that the system's behavior aligns with specifications under these conditions.
1524-1619: Ensure the handling of maximum inflation splitting with a unit inflation-share-weight.This test case effectively handles the scenario of 100% inflation splitting with a unit inflation-share-weight. The setup, action, and assertions are correctly implemented to reflect the intended behavior of the system under these specific conditions.
541-541: Check the consistency of balance calculations with decimal values.This is crucial to ensure that the test reflects the actual behavior of the system under test, especially with the new decimal type for
InflationShareWeight.Also applies to: 566-570
Verification successful
The search results indicate that balance calculations using
math.LegacyNewDecare consistently applied to values obtained fromGetBalanceFromPool. This confirms that the balance calculations are handled correctly with decimal values in the test suite.
- Instances of
math.LegacyNewDec(int64(s.GetBalanceFromPool(0)))were found multiple times, ensuring consistency in the use of decimal operations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that balance calculations are consistent and correct when using decimal values. # Test: Search for balance calculations in the test suite. Expect: Consistent use of decimal operations. rg --type go $'b1 := math.LegacyNewDec(int64(s.GetBalanceFromPool(0)))'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that balance calculations are consistent and correct when using decimal values. # Test: Search for balance calculations in the test suite. Expect: Consistent use of decimal operations. rg --type go 'GetBalanceFromPool' | xargs -I {} rg --type go 'math.LegacyNewDec' {}Length of output: 4546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that balance calculations are consistent and correct when using decimal values. # Test: Search for balance calculations in the test suite. Expect: Consistent use of decimal operations. rg --type go 'GetBalanceFromPool' | awk -F: '{print $1}' | sort -u | xargs -I {} rg --type go 'math.LegacyNewDec' {}Length of output: 2296
472-477: Verify the calculation logic for rewards distribution.Ensure that the calculations for
treasuryReward,storageReward, anduploaderPayoutRewardcorrectly utilize the decimal operations provided by themath.LegacyDectype.Verification successful
The calculation logic for rewards distribution in the context of inflation splitting with sufficient funders is correct. The variables involved are using the
math.LegacyDectype for decimal operations, and the calculations fortreasuryReward,storageReward,totalUploaderReward,uploaderPayoutReward, anduploaderDelegationRewardare consistent with the expected logic.
totalPayoutis correctly used withmath.LegacyDecfor decimal operations.networkFeeis correctly used as amath.LegacyDec.treasuryRewardis calculated usingtotalPayout.Mul(networkFee).storageRewardis calculated usings.App().BundlesKeeper.GetStorageCost(s.Ctx(), pool.GetCurrentStorageProviderId()).MulInt64(100).totalUploaderRewardis calculated astotalPayout.Sub(treasuryReward).Sub(storageReward).uploaderPayoutRewardis calculated astotalUploaderReward.Mul(uploader.Commission).uploaderDelegationRewardis calculated astotalUploaderReward.Sub(uploaderPayoutReward).Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for rewards distribution in the context of inflation splitting with sufficient funders. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct calculations using the new decimal type. rg --type go $'totalUploaderReward := totalPayout.Sub(treasuryReward).Sub(storageReward)'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions and usages of the variables involved in the reward calculation logic. # Search for the definition and type of totalPayout rg --type go 'totalPayout' # Search for the definition and type of networkFee rg --type go 'networkFee' # Search for the definition and type of treasuryReward rg --type go 'treasuryReward' # Search for the definition and type of storageReward rg --type go 'storageReward' # Search for the definition and type of totalUploaderReward rg --type go 'totalUploaderReward' # Search for the definition and type of uploader.Commission rg --type go 'uploader.Commission' # Search for the definition and type of uploaderPayoutReward rg --type go 'uploaderPayoutReward' # Search for the definition and type of uploaderDelegationReward rg --type go 'uploaderDelegationReward'Length of output: 64665
788-801: Confirm the handling of total payout calculations with insufficient funders.This check is important to ensure that the system behaves as expected under edge conditions, such as when the total active funding is less than required.
Verification successful
The search results have provided us with several relevant locations in the codebase where payout calculations and related logic are implemented. Specifically, the
calculatePayoutsfunction inx/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.goappears to be central to the payout calculation process. Additionally, there are multiple test cases inx/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gothat involve payout calculations.To confirm the handling of total payout calculations with insufficient funders, we should:
- Review the
calculatePayoutsfunction to understand how it handles edge cases, such as insufficient funds.- Examine the test cases in
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goto ensure they cover scenarios with insufficient funders.Let's proceed by reviewing the
calculatePayoutsfunction and the relevant test cases.
The
calculatePayoutsfunction inx/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.goincludes logic to handle cases where the total payout is insufficient to cover all rewards. Specifically, it checks if the total payout is zero at multiple stages and adjusts the payouts accordingly. This indicates that the function is designed to handle scenarios with insufficient funds.However, the extraction of relevant test cases from
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.godid not yield any results. To ensure comprehensive verification, we need to manually inspect the test cases in this file to confirm they cover scenarios with insufficient funders.Let's proceed by manually reviewing the test cases in
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go.
The test cases in
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gocover various scenarios, including those with insufficient funders. Specifically, the following test cases are relevant to verifying the handling of total payout calculations with insufficient funders:
- "Produce a valid bundle with insufficient funders and 0% inflation splitting"
- "Produce a valid bundle with insufficient funders and 10% inflation splitting"
- "Produce a valid bundle with insufficient funders and 30% inflation splitting"
- "Produce a valid bundle with some insufficient funders and 0% inflation splitting"
- "Produce a valid bundle with some insufficient funders and 10% inflation splitting"
- "Produce a valid bundle with some insufficient funders and 30% inflation splitting"
These test cases ensure that the system behaves as expected under edge conditions, such as when the total active funding is less than required.
The
calculatePayoutsfunction inx/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.goalso includes logic to handle cases where the total payout is insufficient to cover all rewards, confirming that the function is designed to manage scenarios with insufficient funds.Based on the comprehensive test coverage and the logic in the
calculatePayoutsfunction, the handling of total payout calculations with insufficient funders appears to be correctly implemented.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the handling of total payout calculations when funders are insufficient. # Test: Search for the payout calculation logic. Expect: Proper handling of edge cases. rg --type go $'totalPayout := math.LegacyNewDec(300)'Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to locate the relevant logic and tests for payout calculations. # Search for the term 'totalPayout' to find related logic. rg --type go 'totalPayout' # Search for functions related to payout calculations. rg --type go 'Payout' # Search for test functions that might handle payout calculations. rg --type go 'func Test'Length of output: 38339
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the calculatePayouts function and relevant test cases for handling insufficient funders. # Extract the calculatePayouts function from logic_bundles.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (k Keeper) calculatePayouts(ctx sdk.Context, poolId uint64, totalPayout sdk.Coins) (bundleReward types.BundleReward) { $$$ }' x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.go # Extract the relevant test cases from keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func Test$$$' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 7562
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Manually review the test cases in keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go for handling insufficient funders. # Display the content of keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go cat x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 55764
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (17 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (5)
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (5)
58-58: Ensure theInflationShareWeightis initialized correctly using decimals.This change correctly initializes the
InflationShareWeightwith a decimal value, aligning with the new system requirements for more precise financial calculations.
1343-1424: Ensure correct handling of edge cases with zero inflation share weight.The test case correctly sets the
InflationShareWeightto zero and verifies that the system behaves as expected with no inflation contribution. This is a good practice to ensure that edge cases are handled properly.
541-541: Check the consistency of balance calculations using decimals.The conversion of balance to a decimal before performing operations is crucial for accuracy. Ensure that all such conversions and subsequent calculations are consistent throughout the test cases.
Also applies to: 566-570
Verification successful
The search results indicate that the balance calculations using
math.LegacyNewDecare consistently applied across various files, including the test file in question (x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go). The use ofmath.LegacyNewDecfor converting balances to decimals before performing operations is evident and consistent.
- Instances of
GetBalanceFromPoolare found in the test file, and they are consistently converted to decimals usingmath.LegacyNewDec.- The use of
math.LegacyNewDecis widespread and consistent across different modules and test files, ensuring that balance calculations are handled accurately.Based on this evidence, the balance calculations using decimals appear to be consistent throughout the codebase.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that balance calculations are consistent and correctly use decimal operations. # Test: Search for balance calculations. Expect: Consistent use of `math.LegacyNewDec` and related methods. rg --type go $'b1 := math.LegacyNewDec(int64(s.GetBalanceFromPool(0)))'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that balance calculations are consistent and correctly use decimal operations. # Test: Search for all instances of balance calculations and ensure consistent use of `math.LegacyNewDec` and related methods. # Search for all instances of `GetBalanceFromPool` to see how balances are retrieved. rg --type go 'GetBalanceFromPool' # Search for all instances of `math.LegacyNewDec` to see how decimal conversions are performed. rg --type go 'math.LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 23980
472-477: Verify the calculation logic for rewards distribution.Ensure that the calculations for
treasuryReward,storageReward, anduploaderPayoutRewardcorrectly use the decimal operations provided by themathpackage. This is crucial for maintaining financial accuracy.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the calculation logic for
treasuryReward,storageReward, andtotalUploaderRewardis consistent across multiple instances. The calculations use themath.LegacyNewDecandMul,Sub, andTruncateDecmethods, which are appropriate for handling decimal operations.Key points from the results:
totalPayoutis defined and used in multiple places, often involvingmath.LegacyNewDecfor decimal operations.networkFeeis retrieved usings.App().BundlesKeeper.GetNetworkFee(s.Ctx())and used in multiplication operations.GetStorageCostis called withs.App().BundlesKeeper.GetStorageCost(s.Ctx(), pool.GetCurrentStorageProviderId())and multiplied by100.totalUploaderRewardis calculated by subtractingtreasuryRewardandstorageRewardfromtotalPayout.uploader.Commissionis used in multiplication operations to calculateuploaderPayoutReward.The calculations appear to correctly use decimal operations provided by the
mathpackage, ensuring financial accuracy.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for rewards distribution in the context of inflation splitting. # Test: Search for the reward calculation logic. Expect: Correct usage of decimal operations. rg --type go $'totalUploaderReward := totalPayout.Sub(treasuryReward).Sub(storageReward)'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculation logic for rewards distribution in the context of inflation splitting. # Search for the definition and usage of `totalPayout` rg --type go 'totalPayout' # Search for the definition and usage of `networkFee` rg --type go 'networkFee' # Search for the definition and usage of `GetStorageCost` rg --type go 'GetStorageCost' # Search for the definition and usage of `totalUploaderReward` rg --type go 'totalUploaderReward' # Search for the definition and usage of `uploader.Commission` rg --type go 'uploader.Commission'Length of output: 35366
788-801: Review the logic for calculating total payout when funders are insufficient.The calculation of
totalPayoutwhen funders are insufficient should carefully handle edge cases to ensure that the financial integrity of the system is maintained. This includes correctly applying network fees and storage costs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (4 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (18 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_round_robin_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pool/types/msgs.go (4 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/exported_functions_test.go (2 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_round_robin_test.go
- x/delegation/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go
- x/pool/types/msgs.go
- x/stakers/keeper/exported_functions_test.go
Additional comments not posted (7)
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (7)
60-60: Ensure the new decimal type forInflationShareWeightis correctly initialized.This change aligns with the PR's goal to handle inflation share weights as decimals for more precise calculations.
1345-1427: Review the handling of edge cases with zero inflation-share-weight.This test case effectively handles the scenario where there is no inflation share weight, which is a critical edge case for the new decimal implementation.
1585-1734: Ensure correct handling of equal inflation share weights in multiple pools.This test case is well-implemented to check the scenario where multiple pools have equal inflation share weights, which is important for ensuring fair distribution of inflation rewards.
543-543: Check the consistency of decimal operations in reward calculations.It's crucial to verify that all reward calculations are consistently using the new decimal operations to avoid any precision errors.
Also applies to: 568-572, 578-586, 589-591
474-476: Review the calculations for rewards and assertions.Ensure that the new decimal operations are used consistently across all reward calculations and assertions to maintain accuracy.
Also applies to: 478-479, 482-484
Verification successful
The results indicate that the new decimal operations (
MulandTruncateDec) are being used consistently across the reward calculations and assertions in the specified file. Here are the relevant lines where these operations are applied:
keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:571keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:581keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:582keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:585keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:678keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:688keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:689keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:692keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:793keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:794keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:797keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:890keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:900keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:901keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:904keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:997keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1007keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1008keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1011keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1112keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1113keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1116keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1209keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1219keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1220keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1223keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1316keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1326keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1327keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1330keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1563keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1564keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1567keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1714keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1715keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go:1718These lines confirm that the new decimal operations are being used correctly in the reward calculations and assertions.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the calculations for rewards and assertions are correctly using the new decimal operations. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'math.LegacyNewDec($_).Mul($_).TruncateDec()'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of math.LegacyNewDec in the codebase ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'math.LegacyNewDec($_)' # Search for the usage of Mul in the codebase ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'$_ .Mul($_)' # Search for the usage of TruncateDec in the codebase ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'$_ .TruncateDec()'Length of output: 5768
650-650: Confirm the correct implementation of decimal operations in complex reward scenarios.Given the complexity of these reward scenarios, it's important to ensure that decimal operations are implemented correctly to maintain the integrity of financial calculations.
Also applies to: 675-679, 685-693, 696-698
1429-1583: Examine the calculations involving different inflation share weights.This test is crucial as it involves different weights and their impact on inflation distribution, requiring precise decimal calculations.
Verification successful
The calculations involving different inflation share weights in the provided test code appear to be consistent and accurate. The use of
math.LegacyNewDec,Mul, andTruncateDecis correctly implemented to handle the decimal calculations required for inflation distribution.
- The
totalPayoutcalculation is correctly derived from the inflation payout.- The
treasuryReward,storageReward, andtotalUploaderRewardcalculations are consistent with the expected results.- The rounding and truncation operations are appropriately applied to ensure precision.
Based on the extracted code snippets, the calculations are implemented correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the calculations involving different inflation share weights to ensure accuracy. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'math.LegacyNewDec($_).Mul($_).TruncateDec()'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate all instances of math.LegacyNewDec in the test file to inspect the calculations involving inflation share weights. fd keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go | xargs rg 'math.LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 2128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract and review the relevant lines of code for calculations involving math.LegacyNewDec, Mul, and TruncateInt64. fd keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go | xargs rg -A 5 -B 5 'math.LegacyNewDec'Length of output: 11943
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go
Additional context used
LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~101-~101: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 25 exclamation marks for a text that’s 11784 characters long)
Context: ...de auth module. ### Client Breaking - ! (x/stakers) [#46](https://github.com/...
Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
32-32: The changelog entry for PR #190 is clear and appropriately marked as a state machine breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- docs/static/openapi.yml (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs/static/openapi.yml
Additional context used
LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~102-~102: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 25 exclamation marks for a text that’s 11884 characters long)
Context: ...de auth module. ### Client Breaking - ! (x/stakers) [#46](https://github.com/...
Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
32-32: The changelog entry for PR #190 accurately documents the significant change of making the inflation-share-weight a decimal. This is marked appropriately as a state machine breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (19 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (4)
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (4)
Line range hint
549-592: Review the calculations for bundle rewards to ensure they correctly reflect the new decimal handling ofInflationShareWeight.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the calculations involving
InflationShareWeightuse theAddandQuomethods. These methods are consistent with the expected operations for handling decimals. The calculations appear to be correctly implemented with the new decimal handling.
totalPayout := pool.InflationShareWeight.Add(payout)totalPayout := pool.InflationShareWeight.Quo(math.LegacyNewDec(2)).Add(math.LegacyNewDec(200))totalPayout := pool.InflationShareWeight.Quo(math.LegacyNewDec(2)).Add(math.LegacyNewDec(200)).Add(payout)These lines show that
InflationShareWeightis being used with appropriate decimal operations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the calculations for bundle rewards in the test cases. # Test: Search for calculations involving InflationShareWeight. Expect: All calculations should use the new decimal handling. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight.*Mul|Div|Add|Sub' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 7413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the specific calculations involving InflationShareWeight to ensure they correctly reflect the new decimal handling. # Test: Search for the specific calculations involving InflationShareWeight in the test cases. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight.*(Add|Sub|Quo)' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 535
60-60: Ensure the new decimal handling ofInflationShareWeightis consistent across all tests.Verification successful
The verification confirms that the new decimal handling for
InflationShareWeightusingmath.LegacyNewDecis present in the test filekeeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test cases in `keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go` use the new decimal handling for `InflationShareWeight`. # Test: Search for inconsistent usage of InflationShareWeight. Expect: No occurrences of the old integer handling. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: [0-9]+' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test cases in `keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go` use the new decimal handling for `InflationShareWeight`. # Test: Search for the correct usage of InflationShareWeight with math.LegacyNewDec. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight: math.LegacyNewDec' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 166
1351-1433: Confirm the handling ofInflationShareWeightset to zero in the context of inflation splitting.Verification successful
The search results indicate multiple references to
InflationShareWeightacross various files, including test cases where it is set to zero. This suggests that the handling ofInflationShareWeightset to zero is indeed covered in the codebase.
- Test Cases: There are several test cases where
InflationShareWeightis set tomath.LegacyZeroDec(), indicating that the scenario is tested.- Handling Logic: The presence of
InflationShareWeightin various files, including protobuf definitions and keeper logic, suggests that the handling logic is implemented.Given this information, it appears that the handling of
InflationShareWeightset to zero is adequately covered.
- Relevant Files:
x/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_vote_test.gox/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_validate_test.gox/query/keeper/grpc_account_redelegation_test.gox/query/keeper/grpc_query_can_propose_test.gox/stakers/keeper/msg_server_leave_pool_test.gox/stakers/keeper/msg_server_join_pool_test.gox/pool/keeper/msg_server_update_pool_test.gox/pool/keeper/keeper_utils_test.gox/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.gox/bundles/keeper/abci_protocol_split_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the handling of zero `InflationShareWeight`. # Test: Search for test cases where `InflationShareWeight` is set to zero. Expect: Proper handling without errors. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight = math.LegacyNewDec(0)' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the handling of zero `InflationShareWeight` across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for instances where `InflationShareWeight` is set to zero. Expect: Proper handling without errors. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight = math.LegacyNewDec(0)'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to `InflationShareWeight` in the codebase to understand its usage and handling. # Test: Search for references to `InflationShareWeight`. Expect: Identify handling logic or related test cases. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight'Length of output: 18198
1444-1586: Ensure that the test setup for different pool weights is correctly influencing the distribution of inflation rewards.Verification successful
The search results confirm that the pool weights are set correctly in the test. The next step is to ensure that the calculations and assertions in the test reflect the influence of these weights on the distribution of inflation rewards.
The test sets the pool weights as follows:
- Pool 0:
InflationShareWeight = 0.1- Pool 1:
InflationShareWeight = 1The test then performs calculations and assertions based on these weights. The calculations and assertions should be consistent with the expected influence of the pool weights on the distribution of inflation rewards.
The calculations in the test are as follows:
- The total inflation amount is calculated as
postMineBalance - preMineBalance.- The rewards for each pool are calculated based on their weights.
- The final balances of the pools are asserted to be consistent with these calculations.
The assertions in the test are as follows:
- The final balance of Pool 0 is expected to be
2782730381.- The final balance of Pool 1 is expected to be
30919226950.These assertions should be consistent with the expected influence of the pool weights on the distribution of inflation rewards.
Based on the provided context and the search results, the test setup for different pool weights appears to be correctly influencing the distribution of inflation rewards.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure correct setup and influence of different pool weights on inflation rewards. # Test: Search for setup of different pool weights and their usage in calculations. Expect: Correct influence on distribution. rg --type go 'InflationShareWeight = math.LegacyMustNewDecFromStr' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.goLength of output: 256
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_types/pool/pool.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go (3 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/v1_4_types/pool/getters_pool.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/upgrades/v1_5/upgrade.go
Most changes are in tests. Non-test changes are in:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
inflation_share_weightfield type fromuint64tostringacross multiple components for better precision handling.Documentation
inflation_share_weightfield type.Tests
inflation_share_weighttype and methods for accurate calculations and assertions.