Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: legacy rpc block_results query #194

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mbreithecker
Copy link
Member

@mbreithecker mbreithecker commented Jun 6, 2024

relevant commit in cometbft: KYVENetwork/cometbft@a3ee162

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected the result for a legacy RPC block_results request to ensure accurate data retrieval.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

A bug fix was introduced to the CHANGELOG.md file to ensure the correct result is returned for a legacy RPC block_results request. This fix, implemented in pull request #194, addresses issues with legacy RPC functionality, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of these requests.

Changes

Files Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Documented a bug fix for the legacy RPC block_results request in PR #194.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code, where bugs do creep,
A fix was made, no more will they seep.
The legacy calls now stand so tall,
Thanks to PR #194, they won't fall.
Hopping through code, with joy we sing,
For every fix, a better world we bring. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59bb116 and 178533f.

Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md

[style] ~104-~104: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 25 exclamation marks for a text that’s 12088 characters long) (EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
Context: ...de auth module. ### Client Breaking - ! (x/stakers) [#46](https://github.com/...

Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

43-43: The changelog entry for PR #194 is clear and accurately describes the fix implemented for the legacy RPC block_results query.

@mbreithecker mbreithecker merged commit c27d840 into main Jun 7, 2024
5 checks passed
@mbreithecker mbreithecker deleted the mbreithecker/fix-legacy-rpc branch June 7, 2024 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants