-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
glTF 0.8 #320
glTF 0.8 #320
Conversation
"title" : "accessor", | ||
"type" : "object", | ||
"description" : "A typed accessor into a buffer-view. WebGL: see vertexAttribPointer().", | ||
"extends" : { "$ref" : "glTFChildOfRootProperty.schema.json" }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
accessor is more generic than vertexAttribPointer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeap, I plan on breaking these "WebGL" comments out into a separate custom schema property for "Related WebGL Concepts and APIs." (auto-generated spec from schema). I think these are related enough that we should keep this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In a separate custom schema as you suggest yes. For now I will remove the reference to vertexAttribPointer.
@pjcozzi that's it for my first pass on reviewing. it's a huge amount of work here, thanks a lot Patrick for having put this together. based on your feedback I can iterate on this and push something tomorrow evening and merge at once. |
Will comment on this tonight or tomorrow morning as SIGGRAPH allows. :) |
@fabrobinet please update and merge when ready. Sorry, I have limited time to make changes here at SIGGRAPH. |
Thanks @pjcozzi I will manage to update and merge this tonight |
If you removed this in 0.8, the converter is now broke because it will still be there. |
@pjcozzi actually I didn't remember interpolation was actually exported and you're right so I have reverted this change. |
@fabrobinet for your immediate review.
CC #241