You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
referencing #17 , the time designator cannot be alone and not followed by an empty time string.
We can possibly accept it with strict = false as it is unambiguously a date, but then, should time be inferred as 00:00:00?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
referencing #17 , the time designator cannot be alone and not followed by an empty time string
I agree with your assessment. It is also nonsensical that a time designator [T] would be included in a date-only string. I think it should not be a valid string - even if strict==false.
We can possibly accept it with strict = false as it is unambiguously a date, but then, should time be inferred as 00:00:00?
In the case of date string to timestamp, good question what should be the default time, presumably the developer is planning to ignore it anyway. I think 00:00:00 is reasonable.
referencing #17 , the time designator cannot be alone and not followed by an empty time string.
We can possibly accept it with strict = false as it is unambiguously a date, but then, should time be inferred as 00:00:00?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: