Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "add jargon busting"" #19

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

guyer
Copy link
Contributor

@guyer guyer commented Oct 23, 2024

This reverts commit de6d51c.

If this pull request addresses an open issue on the repository, please add 'Closes #NN' below, where NN is the issue number.

Please briefly summarise the changes made in the pull request, and the reason(s) for making these changes.

  • Restores jargon_busting.md file to fix broken link in intro.md.
  • Updates language of intro.md from Tidy Data to Computational Thinking

If any relevant discussions have taken place elsewhere, please provide links to these.

For more guidance on how to contribute changes to a Carpentries project, please review the Contributing Guide and Code of Conduct.

Please keep in mind that lesson Maintainers are volunteers and it may be some time before they can respond to your contribution. Although not all contributions can be incorporated into the lesson materials, we appreciate your time and effort to improve the curriculum. If you have any questions about the lesson maintenance process or would like to volunteer your time as a contribution reviewer, please contact The Carpentries Team at team@carpentries.org.

This reverts commit de6d51c.

Restores jargon_busting.md file
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/LibraryCarpentry/lc-computational-thinking/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-19

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 intro.md                |  2 +-
 jargon_busting.md (new) | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 md5sum.txt              |  5 +++--
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-11-12 17:31:35 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
@jt14den jt14den merged commit b33ff16 into LibraryCarpentry:main Nov 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@jt14den
Copy link
Member

jt14den commented Nov 12, 2024

thanks @guyer

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : b33ff16
Branch  : main
Author  : Tim Dennis <tdennis@library.ucla.edu>
Time    : 2024-11-12 17:41:37 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #19 from guyer/add_jargon_busting_file

Revert "Revert "add jargon busting""
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : 5b94bcf
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <actions@github.com>
Time    : 2024-11-12 17:42:30 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : b33ff16
Branch  : main
Author  : Tim Dennis <tdennis@library.ucla.edu>
Time    : 2024-11-12 17:41:37 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #19 from guyer/add_jargon_busting_file

Revert "Revert "add jargon busting""
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants