Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Lithuanian dictionaries to version 1.3.2 #35

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rimas-kudelis
Copy link

No description provided.

@rimas-kudelis
Copy link
Author

I would also suggest to move these dictionaries from lt_LT to lt.

@fitojb
Copy link
Contributor

fitojb commented Aug 4, 2022

Sorry Rimas, I have just seen this. As you know, LibreOffice does not use the proprietary GitHub for its development process. Please submit this through Gerrit or let me know if you’d prefer me taking care of that for you this time. Also, if you haven’t done so already, please submit a license statement for your patch to be merged. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved

@rimas-kudelis
Copy link
Author

rimas-kudelis commented Sep 22, 2022

@fitojb

Sorry Rimas, I have just seen this. As you know, LibreOffice does not use the proprietary GitHub for its development process.

Which doesn't seem to be communicated anywhere in this repository.

Please submit this through Gerrit or let me know if you’d prefer me taking care of that for you this time.

Yes, please do take care of this for me.

Also, if you haven’t done so already, please submit a license statement for your patch to be merged. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved

The whole dictionary is BSD-licensed (the license is distributed together with the files, as you can see from the patch), and I'm only a minor contributor to it. I don't think I did nearly enough to even mandate a license statement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants