Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove LoggerConnector.on_trainer_init #11121

Conversation

ananthsub
Copy link
Contributor

@ananthsub ananthsub commented Dec 17, 2021

What does this PR do?

  • Moves property initialization to trainer
  • Adds typehints for affected flags on the Trainer

Follow up to comment here: https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/pull/11114/files#r771039150

Part of #7037, #10417

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

None

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • [n/a] Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

- Moves property initialization to trainer
- Adds typehints for affected flags on the Trainer
@@ -48,25 +46,6 @@ def __init__(self, trainer: "pl.Trainer", log_gpu_memory: Optional[str] = None)
self._batch_idx: Optional[int] = None
self._split_idx: Optional[int] = None

def on_trainer_init(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In #10417 we propose to make the logger owned by the connector. The two methods on_trainer_init and configure_logger would then essentially become part of the LoggerConnector init without reference to the trainer. What are your thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would definitely prefer this approach. Right now, the Trainer is starting to become a bigger class and it is getting harder for users to parse it.

@mergify mergify bot removed the has conflicts label Dec 17, 2021
@@ -569,9 +569,9 @@ def __init__(
# configure profiler
self.__init_profiler(profiler)

# init logger flags
# configure logger flags
self.logger: Optional[LightningLoggerBase]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I played a bit with this and this definition needs to be in the __init__, otherwise mypy will treat it as Any

@mergify mergify bot added the has conflicts label Feb 9, 2022
@ananthsub ananthsub removed this from the 1.6 milestone Feb 16, 2022
@ananthsub ananthsub closed this Feb 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants