-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standardize positional datamodule and argument names #7431
Conversation
Hello @carmocca! Thanks for updating this PR. There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2021-06-15 11:26:10 UTC |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7431 +/- ##
======================================
- Coverage 92% 91% -0%
======================================
Files 203 203
Lines 13151 13173 +22
======================================
- Hits 12042 12026 -16
- Misses 1109 1147 +38 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consider using this wrapper https://github.com/Borda/pyDeprecate#self-argument-mapping
with mapping to rank zero https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/blob/96433d03ea6323adea9a822a8222f7ea7ffba99b/pytorch_lightning/metrics/utils.py#L32
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM !
What does this PR do?
Fixes #7425
DataModule
as the second positional argumentI guess these 3 things could be split. Kept them together for convenience.
Question
Should we change the dataloader arguments to singular instead of plural?
Before submitting
PR review