add warning when Trainer(log_every_n_steps) not well chosen

[awaelchli]

What does this PR do?

Fixes #7705

No training logs are shown if the logging interval is smaller than the dataloader size. We show a warning that the value for
log_every_n_steps can be decreased if desired.

Printing the warning in the reset_dataloader() method is maybe not the best but could not find a better place. Suggestion welcome.

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
• Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
• Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
• Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
• Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

• Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
• Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
• Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
• Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7734 (44f6243) into master (41be61c) will decrease coverage by 0%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #7734   +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage      93%     92%   -0%     
======================================
  Files         202     202           
  Lines       13121   13123    +2     
======================================
- Hits        12154   12118   -36     
- Misses        967    1005   +38     

[carmocca]

Should we show the same warning for val batches?

[awaelchli]

@carmocca
not necessary, logging frequency has no influence there, since all logs from evaluation are aggregated into a single logging step.