Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Bump pretrained weights to 0.6.0 #940

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2021
Merged

Conversation

ethanwharris
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

Fixes # (issue)

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? [not needed for typos/docs]
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • If you made a notable change (that affects users), did you update the CHANGELOG?

PR review

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #940 (bc17684) into master (eec8485) will increase coverage by 2.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #940      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.29%   88.32%   +2.03%     
==========================================
  Files         242      242              
  Lines       13053    13053              
==========================================
+ Hits        11264    11529     +265     
+ Misses       1789     1524     -265     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.32% <ø> (+2.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
flash/core/data/data_pipeline.py 95.67% <0.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/process.py 85.71% <0.00%> (+0.38%) ⬆️
flash/image/classification/adapters.py 82.58% <0.00%> (+0.44%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/batch.py 95.78% <0.00%> (+0.60%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/data_module.py 94.90% <0.00%> (+1.45%) ⬆️
flash/core/model.py 88.16% <0.00%> (+1.63%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/callback.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+2.66%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/base_viz.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+4.00%) ⬆️
flash/image/segmentation/heads.py 95.65% <0.00%> (+4.34%) ⬆️
flash/core/data/data_source.py 94.80% <0.00%> (+4.54%) ⬆️
... and 20 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eec8485...bc17684. Read the comment docs.

@ethanwharris ethanwharris merged commit 4a242e6 into master Nov 7, 2021
@ethanwharris ethanwharris deleted the feature/0.6.0_models branch November 7, 2021 13:42
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants