feat: support to rename test suite and case

[LinuxSuRen]

We highly recommend you read the contributor's documentation before starting the review process especially since this is your first contribution to this project.

It was updated on 2024/5/27

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

[github-actions]

There are 1 test cases, failed count 0:

Name	Average	Max	Min	Count	Error
	10.392723ms	12.067003ms	9.182482ms	3	0

Reported by api-testing.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ -0.31% (target: -1.00%)	❌ 15.56% (target: 80.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (72c53c2)	18174	7497	41.25%
Head commit (e74af38)	18833 (+659)	7711 (+214)	40.94% (-0.31%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#550)	392	61	15.56%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[yuluo-yx]

lgtm

[LinuxSuRen]

The e2e was failed. I didn't figure out the reason yet.

[yuluo-yx]

testing-1  | POST http://localhost:8080/api/v1/suites error: Case: createSuite. error: error is: case: createSuite, expect 200, actual 503. body: {"code":14,"message":"connection error: desc = \"transport: Error while dialing: dial unix /root/.config/atest/atest-store-etcd.sock: connect: no such file or directory\"","details":[]}
testing-1  | Consumed: 3.009963309s
testing-1  | Error: failed to run 'createSuite', error is: case: createSuite, expect 200, actual 503

may be the problem here?

[LinuxSuRen]

Yes, I don't konw why the etcd extension is not ready.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[LinuxSuRen]

may be the problem here?

hi @yuluo-yx I fixed it. Actually, the e2e helped me find the potential issues.

See also https://github.com/LinuxSuRen/api-testing/pull/550/files#diff-79261c1539975386167acc933dd926eab625c8571f084f71697e9f2e94bc7222R136

The tests failed due to incorrect lock usage. The wrong usage:

	s.lock.Lock()
        defer s.lock.Unlock()
	s.filesNeedToBeRemoved = append(s.filesNeedToBeRemoved, socketFile)
	s.extStatusMap[pluginName] = true

the correct one:

	s.lock.Lock()
	s.filesNeedToBeRemoved = append(s.filesNeedToBeRemoved, socketFile)
	s.extStatusMap[pluginName] = true
	s.lock.Unlock()