Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: prob attention shape error while bs>1 #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

fix: prob attention shape error while bs>1 #50

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

LongxingTan
Copy link
Owner

Description

This PR ...

Checklist

  • Linked issues (if existing)
  • Amended changelog.md for large changes (and added myself there as contributor)
  • Added/modified tests
  • Used pre-commit hooks when committing to ensure that code is compliant with hooks. Install hooks with pre-commit install.
    To run hooks independent of commit, execute pre-commit run --all-files

Thank you for joining. Have fun coding!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (679e349) 89.07% compared to head (57095bd) 89.07%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #50      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.07%   89.07%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        2133     2132       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1900     1899       -1     
  Misses        233      233              
Flag Coverage Δ
cpu 89.07% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittest 89.07% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
tfts/layers/attention_layer.py 89.93% <100.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@LongxingTan LongxingTan merged commit f3db233 into master Oct 16, 2023
17 checks passed
@LongxingTan LongxingTan deleted the pretrain branch October 16, 2023 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant