-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fully transparent pixel-sized-holes in alpha channel in fully opaque render. #536
Comments
Your test scene has not enabled alpha channel at all. Am I missing something ? |
It should have the transparent background enabled in the camera, and you see the alpha as black because it's inverted due to the color ramp, just to make the pixel more visible, here is another picture: The alpha should be fully opaque (with the color ramp, fully black), but it has some white pixels, in more complex scenes they are like pixel-holes in the render. Just in case I uploaded the wrong .blend I'll upload it again, this time I made 100% sure that this is the correct Blend I show you in the picture: |
Alpha is not enabled in LuxCore AOVs panel and it is not configured through LuxCore API. Does it happen if you enable Alpha in AOVs pannel ? This may be a bug in BlendLuxCore, it may ask for a not configure AOV and get just garbage. |
When "use transparent film" is enabled, the ALPHA AOV is added: |
Do you use different code for the FILESAVER ? Alpha is not enabled when exporting the scene. |
@Dade916 you can enable the Alpha AOV if you want, there should not be any difference, just that when you export you have the AOV, but in my render the Alpha is enabled, so enable it anyways :) |
Yes, transparent film is ignored when using filesaver. |
I should have fixed the problem. |
Thanks @Dade916 I’ll test this tomorrow and confirm the fix :) |
I`m not sure this is entirely solved, now I-m getting alpha transparency in fully solid parts of the scene, I see this happening in vegetation materials, like grass or plants, here is an example: Render section: Render alpha: This is the shader used for this plant, which is one of the obvious ones, nothing fancy: |
I solved the problem of the original test scene. That one looks like something different: it smells like a side effect of recent changes to alpha channel. You should try:
|
Ok, I'll do these tests. Ignore the previous picture, I was wrong, I'll do the tests and tell you something, I'll also try to send you a simple scene to reproduce it. |
Ok, you have another PM in the forum with a scene with a cube that reproduces the exact problem :) (Today you have two PM's from me with two different scenes with two different problems, it's being a prplific day hahaha) I'll test this in 2.5 to see if it happens, but I have to render some scenes for today so I won't be able to install back 2.5 I think, I'll do it if I can :) The problem still happens with the Path depth to 64 (in everything). |
Well, it is the result of using glossytranslucent: it transmits paths over an hemisphere so some of them will just hit the sky and set alpha according due to the recent changes (https://forums.luxcorerender.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3568&start=10#p30294). It works as you expected in the following cases:
#1 and #2 will change a bit the look for a plant shown full screen (but, I'm pretty sure, not in your scene). #3 may produce the correct result because, instead of using a diffuse transmission (i.e. over all the hemisphere), will use a glossy transmission (i.e. more "directional" if you use low roughness values so the paths will hit the solid background instead of been fired in random directions). However the reflections will be too sharp. |
A possible solution to the changes of https://forums.luxcorerender.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3568&start=10#p30294 could be to set alpha only for specular or glossy transmissions (not for diffuse transmissions). |
I applied this change to the sources, it seems to work well and it makes sense. |
Great, but I think I won't be able to test it until @Theverat updates the addon, right? |
The Linux daily binaries should still be for v2.92 so you may be able to try it. |
ah, ok, I'll test it on linux, but does it require some setting? Because if we get alpha over translucent materials it renders translucency useless to recreate vegetation, and we cannot recreate vegetation withoout translucency :) |
No, it should work out of the box. |
Think that it's normal to want alpah out of normal glass, but in general we don't need alpha from the translucency of a tree leave or from grass, but we actually need translucency. |
You are not using the correct version. The latest sources are working. You can check the status of builds here: https://dev.azure.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxCoreRender/_build When they are all green, you can download the latest builds. I think Acasta69 reverted to Python v3.7 so Windows build will be usable too (when ready). |
Understood, I'll repeate the test as soon as I see everything green. Thanks! |
DONE! The translucent problem is gone, I'll do another test with a bigger scene, but it seems to be solved :) |
I'm getting some fully transparent pixels in my renders, it was hard to notice at first, but when I used the result for compositing, using a bright image behind the darker interior showed some pixels, I mention them as fireflies because they are single pixels, but it's not fireflies, it's more like holes in the alpha, holes of the size of a pixel.
This becomes obvious when I force the contrast in a scene that should not allow a single transparent pixel:
Render:
Alpha channel contrasted to make the problem more visible, make a zoom if you don't see the white pixel, the pixel-holes does not repeat from render to render, they are different:
Here is the blend file I used for this example, the composite in the compositor is the alpha to make the problem visible:
alpha_bug.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: