Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] Update all of rails: 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7 (patch) #925

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2022

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Mar 8, 2022


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rails (6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionpack (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ actionview (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activejob (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible code injection vulnerability in Rails / Active Storage

There is a possible code injection vulnerability in the Active Storage module
of Rails. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier
CVE-2022-21831.

Versions Affected: >= 5.2.0
Not affected: < 5.2.0
Fixed Versions: 7.0.2.3, 6.1.4.7, 6.0.4.7, 5.2.6.3

Impact

There is a possible code injection vulnerability in the Active Storage module
of Rails. This vulnerability impacts applications that use Active Storage
with the image_processing processing in addition to the mini_magick back end
for image_processing.

Vulnerable code will look something similar to this:

<%= image_tag blob.variant(params[:t] => params[:v]) %>

Where the transformation method or its arguments are untrusted arbitrary
input.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the
workarounds immediately.

Workarounds

To work around this issue, applications should implement a strict allow-list
on accepted transformation methods or arguments. Additionally, a strict image
magick security policy will help mitigate this issue.

https://imagemagick.org/script/security-policy.php

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ activesupport (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ railties (indirect, 6.1.4.6 → 6.1.4.7) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 3 commits:

↗️ sprockets (indirect, 4.0.2 → 4.0.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

4.0.3 (from changelog)

  • Fix Manifest#find yielding from a Promise causing issue on Ruby 3.1.0-dev. #720
  • Better detect the ERB version to avoid deprecation warnings. #719
  • Allow assets already fingerprinted to be served through Sprockets::Server
  • Do not fingerprint files that already contain a valid digest in their name
  • Remove remaining support for Ruby < 2.4.#672

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Mar 8, 2022
@mitlib mitlib temporarily deployed to thesis-submit-pr-925 March 8, 2022 20:37 Inactive
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.123% when pulling f428973 on depfu/update/group/rails-6.1.4.7 into b885add on main.

@jazairi jazairi merged commit cab2985 into main Mar 8, 2022
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/group/rails-6.1.4.7 branch March 8, 2022 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants