Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade express from 4.13.4 to 4.20.0 #47

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

minepicco
Copy link
Contributor

@minepicco minepicco commented Sep 18, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • plugin/multiplex/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
  738  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Upgrade the express dependency from version 4.13.3 to 4.20.0 in the package.json file of the multiplex plugin.

Why are these changes being made?

This change addresses security vulnerabilities present in older versions of express and ensures the application benefits from the latest security patches and improvements. Upgrading to a more recent version helps maintain the security and stability of the application.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Tests
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteCI
Debug access npm/on-finished@2.4.1 🚫
Uses eval npm/depd@2.0.0 🚫
Debug access npm/raw-body@2.5.2 🚫
Uses eval npm/get-intrinsic@1.2.4 🚫
New author npm/encodeurl@2.0.0 🚫
New author npm/body-parser@1.20.3 🚫
Unstable ownership npm/body-parser@1.20.3 🚫
New author npm/serve-static@1.16.0 🚫
Unstable ownership npm/serve-static@1.16.0 🚫
New author npm/send@0.19.0 🚫
Unstable ownership npm/send@0.19.0 🚫

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is debug access?

Uses debug, reflection and dynamic code execution features.

Removing the use of debug will reduce the risk of any reflection and dynamic code execution.

What is eval?

Package uses eval() which is a dangerous function. This prevents the code from running in certain environments and increases the risk that the code may contain exploits or malicious behavior.

Avoid packages that use eval, since this could potentially execute any code.

What is new author?

A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.

Scrutinize new collaborator additions to packages because they now have the ability to publish code into your dependency tree. Packages should avoid frequent or unnecessary additions or changes to publishing rights.

What is unstable ownership?

A new collaborator has begun publishing package versions. Package stability and security risk may be elevated.

Try to reduce the amount of authors you depend on to reduce the risk to malicious actors gaining access to your supply chain. Packages should remove inactive collaborators with publishing rights from packages on npm.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/on-finished@2.4.1
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/depd@2.0.0
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/raw-body@2.5.2
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/get-intrinsic@1.2.4
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/encodeurl@2.0.0
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/body-parser@1.20.3
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/serve-static@1.16.0
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/send@0.19.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants