Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle all DVPortGroups in the VMware Provision Workflow #25

Merged

Conversation

agrare
Copy link
Member

@agrare agrare commented Mar 13, 2017

Move setting the dvportgroups into the vmware provision workflow so
that we don't delete a vlan name collision

Requires: ManageIQ/manageiq#14292

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430709

@agrare agrare added the bug label Mar 13, 2017
@agrare agrare changed the title Don't delete the old vlan key Don't delete the old vlan key in provision workflow Mar 13, 2017
@gmcculloug
Copy link
Member

@blomquisg The dependent PR has been merged. Please restart tests.

Move setting the dvportgroups into the vmware provision workflow so
that we don't delete a vlan name collision

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430709
@agrare agrare force-pushed the bz_1430709_dvportgroup_vm_network_same_name branch from 01ffc99 to 335bab6 Compare March 20, 2017 19:34
@agrare agrare changed the title Don't delete the old vlan key in provision workflow Handle all DVPortGroups in the VMware Provision Workflow Mar 20, 2017
@blomquisg blomquisg merged commit e4f9d71 into ManageIQ:master Mar 20, 2017
@blomquisg blomquisg added this to the Sprint 57 Ending Mar 27, 2017 milestone Mar 20, 2017
@agrare agrare deleted the bz_1430709_dvportgroup_vm_network_same_name branch March 20, 2017 20:45
agrare pushed a commit to agrare/manageiq-providers-vmware that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2019
…_retirment

Automate - Refactoring infra vm pre_retirement method.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants