Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add custom http code to response #136

Merged

Conversation

vasilykabanov
Copy link

No description provided.

/**
* The HTTP status code which should be returned when limiting the rate.
*/
private HttpStatus httpStatusCode = HttpStatus.TOO_MANY_REQUESTS;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

13% of developers fix this issue

UnnecessarilyFullyQualified: This fully qualified name is unambiguous to the compiler if imported.


Suggested change
private HttpStatus httpStatusCode = HttpStatus.TOO_MANY_REQUESTS;
SuppressWarnings

ℹ️ Expand to see all @sonatype-lift commands

You can reply with the following commands. For example, reply with @sonatype-lift ignoreall to leave out all findings.

Command Usage
@sonatype-lift ignore Leave out the above finding from this PR
@sonatype-lift ignoreall Leave out all the existing findings from this PR
@sonatype-lift exclude <file|issue|path|tool> Exclude specified file|issue|path|tool from Lift findings by updating your config.toml file

Note: When talking to LiftBot, you need to refresh the page to see its response.
Click here to add LiftBot to another repo.


Help us improve LIFT! (Sonatype LiftBot external survey)

Was this a good recommendation for you? Answering this survey will not impact your Lift settings.

[ 🙁 Not relevant ] - [ 😕 Won't fix ] - [ 😑 Not critical, will fix ] - [ 🙂 Critical, will fix ] - [ 😊 Critical, fixing now ]

/**
* The HTTP status code which should be returned when limiting the rate.
*/
private HttpStatus httpStatusCode = HttpStatus.TOO_MANY_REQUESTS;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

13% of developers fix this issue

UnnecessarilyFullyQualified: This fully qualified name is unambiguous to the compiler if imported.


Suggested change
private HttpStatus httpStatusCode = HttpStatus.TOO_MANY_REQUESTS;
SuppressWarnings

ℹ️ Expand to see all @sonatype-lift commands

You can reply with the following commands. For example, reply with @sonatype-lift ignoreall to leave out all findings.

Command Usage
@sonatype-lift ignore Leave out the above finding from this PR
@sonatype-lift ignoreall Leave out all the existing findings from this PR
@sonatype-lift exclude <file|issue|path|tool> Exclude specified file|issue|path|tool from Lift findings by updating your config.toml file

Note: When talking to LiftBot, you need to refresh the page to see its response.
Click here to add LiftBot to another repo.


Help us improve LIFT! (Sonatype LiftBot external survey)

Was this a good recommendation for you? Answering this survey will not impact your Lift settings.

[ 🙁 Not relevant ] - [ 😕 Won't fix ] - [ 😑 Not critical, will fix ] - [ 🙂 Critical, will fix ] - [ 😊 Critical, fixing now ]

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
}

private void handleHttpResponseOnRateLimiting(HttpServletResponse httpResponse, ConsumptionProbe probe) throws IOException {
httpResponse.setStatus(429);
httpResponse.setStatus(filterConfig.getHttpStatusCode().value());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

18% of developers fix this issue

NULL_DEREFERENCE: object GenericFilterBean.filterConfig last accessed on line 71 could be null and is dereferenced at line 71.


ℹ️ Expand to see all @sonatype-lift commands

You can reply with the following commands. For example, reply with @sonatype-lift ignoreall to leave out all findings.

Command Usage
@sonatype-lift ignore Leave out the above finding from this PR
@sonatype-lift ignoreall Leave out all the existing findings from this PR
@sonatype-lift exclude <file|issue|path|tool> Exclude specified file|issue|path|tool from Lift findings by updating your config.toml file

Note: When talking to LiftBot, you need to refresh the page to see its response.
Click here to add LiftBot to another repo.


Help us improve LIFT! (Sonatype LiftBot external survey)

Was this a good recommendation for you? Answering this survey will not impact your Lift settings.

[ 🙁 Not relevant ] - [ 😕 Won't fix ] - [ 😑 Not critical, will fix ] - [ 🙂 Critical, will fix ] - [ 😊 Critical, fixing now ]

@sonatype-lift
Copy link
Contributor

sonatype-lift bot commented Feb 8, 2023

🛠 Lift Auto-fix

Some of the Lift findings in this PR can be automatically fixed. You can download and apply these changes in your local project directory of your branch to review the suggestions before committing.1

# Download the patch
curl https://lift.sonatype.com/api/patch/github.com/MarcGiffing/bucket4j-spring-boot-starter/136.diff -o lift-autofixes.diff

# Apply the patch with git
git apply lift-autofixes.diff

# Review the changes
git diff

Want it all in a single command? Open a terminal in your project's directory and copy and paste the following command:

curl https://lift.sonatype.com/api/patch/github.com/MarcGiffing/bucket4j-spring-boot-starter/136.diff | git apply

Once you're satisfied, commit and push your changes in your project.

Footnotes

  1. You can preview the patch by opening the patch URL in the browser.

MarcGiffing added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2023
- mark Configuration httpStatusCode as @NotNull
- Readme
	-- add httpStatusCode hint
	-- move metrics to the end
@MarcGiffing MarcGiffing added this to the 0.8.0 milestone Feb 12, 2023
MarcGiffing added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2023
we only need the spring-web dependency for the HttpStatus. Not the
spring-boot-starter-web.
@MarcGiffing MarcGiffing merged commit 0761e38 into MarcGiffing:master Feb 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants