-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add shouldBeInRange for ClosedRanges #119 #160
Add shouldBeInRange for ClosedRanges #119 #160
Conversation
Also add JVM support for backtick version
Thank you for the contribution! |
Signed-off-by: Kshitij09 <kshitijpatil98@gmail.com>
Resolved merge conflicts with javatarz/range-assertions branch. Added Unit tests for shouldNotBeInRange. Also made appropriate method call for backtick version. Added name into AUTHORS file. Signed-off-by: Kshitij09 <kshitijpatil98@gmail.com>
Fix the link to Kshitij09's commits
Added shouldNotBeInRange for ClosedRange MarkusAmshove#119
Hey @MarkusAmshove, @Kshitij09 has helped me out in implementing Can you have a look at this PR before merging? |
Thank you, I've merged it and put it onto my todo list for 1.60. |
This is now part of v1.60 |
Description
Completes open issue #119 by implementing
ClosedRange<T>.shouldBeInRange(ClosedRange<T>)
.Also adds JVM support for backtick version.
Already a contributor so no addition to the
AUTHORS
file :)Checklist
AUTHORS
file, if it wasn't already present.