Adding indices on jobs table

[phixMe]

Problem

Our current /lineage query is a little slow in instances where there are many jobs. When looking at the query plan, lots of the time is spent in the jobs table with the join operation. We are joining on some unindexed fields via the jobs_view query that merges the jobs table and the jobs_fqn table for some semantic simplicity with our data model.

Solution

Adds indices to the fields used we join on inside the lineage query.

Note: All database schema changes require discussion. Please link the issue for context.

Checklist

• You've signed-off your work
• Your changes are accompanied by tests (if relevant)
• Your change contains a small diff and is self-contained
• You've updated any relevant documentation (if relevant)
• You've updated the CHANGELOG.md with details about your change under the "Unreleased" section (if relevant, depending on the change, this may not be necessary)
• You've versioned your .sql database schema migration according to Flyway's naming convention (if relevant)
• You've included a header in any source code files (if relevant)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2161 (8a35583) into main (5265c92) will decrease coverage by 0.81%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 8a35583 differs from pull request most recent head 24f2ad1. Consider uploading reports for the commit 24f2ad1 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2161      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     76.60%   75.78%   -0.82%     
+ Complexity     1136     1061      -75     
============================================
  Files           219      209      -10     
  Lines          5287     5006     -281     
  Branches        420      403      -17     
============================================
- Hits           4050     3794     -256     
+ Misses          765      763       -2     
+ Partials        472      449      -23     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/src/main/java/marquez/service/models/Node.java	50.00% <0.00%> (-11.54%)	⬇️
.../java/src/main/java/marquez/client/MarquezUrl.java	60.31% <0.00%> (-5.44%)	⬇️
...ients/java/src/main/java/marquez/client/Utils.java	84.61% <0.00%> (-2.49%)	⬇️
...i/src/main/java/marquez/service/models/NodeId.java	62.10% <0.00%> (-2.39%)	⬇️
...a/src/main/java/marquez/client/models/Dataset.java	56.66% <0.00%> (-1.40%)	⬇️
...main/java/marquez/service/models/LineageEvent.java	85.07% <0.00%> (-1.23%)	⬇️
.../src/main/java/marquez/service/models/Dataset.java	72.41% <0.00%> (-0.92%)	⬇️
api/src/main/java/marquez/MarquezContext.java	84.93% <0.00%> (-0.79%)	⬇️
...va/src/main/java/marquez/client/MarquezPathV1.java	62.29% <0.00%> (-0.61%)	⬇️
...va/src/main/java/marquez/client/MarquezClient.java	59.90% <0.00%> (-0.45%)	⬇️
... and 21 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[pawel-big-lebowski]

Having index on reference columns seems to be a good idea most of the time 🥇 🚀 💯

[mobuchowski]

@phixMe do we want to have this in the next release?

[phixMe]

@mobuchowski Yeah, let's get this in.