Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc/user: improve builtin cluster descriptions #27813

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2024

Conversation

benesch
Copy link
Member

@benesch benesch commented Jun 23, 2024

This brings the descriptions of the builtin clusters in line with what we're putting in the console (MaterializeInc/console#2587).

Motivation

  • This PR refactors existing documentation.

Checklist

@benesch benesch requested a review from morsapaes as a code owner June 23, 2024 04:23
Comment on lines 53 to 55
* You can run `SELECT` or `SUBSCRIBE` queries in this cluster as long
as you only reference objects in the [system catalog
objects](https://materialize.com/docs/sql/system-catalog/).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* You can run `SELECT` or `SUBSCRIBE` queries in this cluster as long
as you only reference objects in the [system catalog
objects](https://materialize.com/docs/sql/system-catalog/).
* You can run `SELECT` or `SUBSCRIBE` queries in this cluster as long
as you only reference [system catalog](https://materialize.com/docs/sql/system-catalog/) objects.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ugh, thanks!

This brings the descriptions of the builtin clusters in line with what
we're putting in the console (MaterializeInc/console#2587).
@benesch benesch enabled auto-merge June 23, 2024 04:37
@benesch benesch merged commit 4de738a into MaterializeInc:main Jun 23, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants