Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add coveralls plugin for code coverage #46

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 9, 2017
Merged

Conversation

MatiasComercio
Copy link
Owner

Add JUnit dependency on webapp module
Add default JacoboCoverageEnableModule in case there are no tests on
that module (to report code coverage)
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling efd20a9 on coveralls into ** on development**.

@MatiasComercio MatiasComercio force-pushed the coveralls branch 9 times, most recently from 2a771eb to 80d32f6 Compare January 9, 2017 17:24
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 3ef1fb5 on coveralls into ** on development**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 62b2ea5 on coveralls into ** on development**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 91183f4 on coveralls into ** on development**.

@MatiasComercio MatiasComercio force-pushed the coveralls branch 4 times, most recently from d3ab656 to 14281bf Compare January 9, 2017 19:37
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 6c89717 on coveralls into ** on development**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling d80ddcf on coveralls into ** on development**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling aca937f on coveralls into ** on development**.

@MatiasComercio MatiasComercio merged commit 88ff648 into development Jan 9, 2017
@MatiasComercio MatiasComercio deleted the coveralls branch January 9, 2017 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants