Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

up #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2024
Merged

up #102

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

MrIbrahem
Copy link
Collaborator

@MrIbrahem MrIbrahem commented Mar 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced file import functionality to support new API for uploading files from NC Commons to Wikipedia.
    • Added capabilities for downloading and uploading files to a wiki platform with error and duplicate handling.
  • Refactor

    • Improved consistency in string representation across the codebase.
    • Updated methods and function calls for better efficiency and readability.
  • Style

    • Standardized comment and docstring formats to use double quotes.
    • Made minor formatting changes for code cleanliness.
  • Documentation

    • Initiated documentation for importing from NC Commons.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing code consistency, particularly in string representation, and improving functionality related to file imports and uploads. Changes include standardizing string quotes, refining documentation, and integrating a new API for more efficient file handling between platforms. These modifications aim to streamline operations and reduce potential errors, ensuring smoother processes for uploading and managing content.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../nc_import/bot.py Standardized string quotes in main block.
.../bots/gt_pages.py, .../wrk_pages.py Updated multiline comments and string quotes; minor refactoring and cleanup.
.../bots/import_files.py, .../upload_file.py Enhanced file import/upload functionality using a new API; error handling.
.../bots/template_nc.py Added documentation string placeholder.

🐇✨

In the land of code and night,
A rabbit hopped with pure delight.
Strings aligned in quotes so bright,
Files flew on the web's great kite.

Through the digital burrow's flight,
Changes spark in the moon's soft light.
🌟📄✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

sweep-ai bot commented Mar 10, 2024

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

  • Apply: All docstrings and comments should be up to date.
  • Apply: Leftover TODOs in the code should be handled.
  • Apply: Any clearly inefficient or repeated code should be optimized or refactored.
  • Apply: Update the README.md file whenever a new feature is added. Make sure to include a description of the feature and any new commands.

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebb65fd and 6b61c26.
Files selected for processing (6)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bot.py (1 hunks)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/gt_pages.py (2 hunks)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/import_files.py (1 hunks)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/template_nc.py (1 hunks)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/upload_file.py (1 hunks)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/wrk_pages.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • ncc_core/nc_import/bots/template_nc.py
Additional comments: 8
ncc_core/nc_import/bot.py (1)
  • 21-22: The change from single to double quotes in the if __name__ == "__main__": block aligns with Python's style guidelines for string literals, enhancing consistency and readability. Good job on maintaining code consistency.
ncc_core/nc_import/bots/gt_pages.py (2)
  • 1-9: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [6-18]

Switching from ''' to """ for multiline comments aligns with Python's convention for docstrings and multiline comments, enhancing readability and consistency. This is a good practice.

  • 22-22: Using double quotes for the family parameter in the NEW_API call improves consistency with the rest of the codebase that uses double quotes for string literals. This is a positive change.
ncc_core/nc_import/bots/import_files.py (2)
  • 15-22: The addition of the get_file_text function is well-implemented. It correctly checks if the title starts with "File:" and fetches text from ncc_MainPage, using the printe module for consistent output. This is a good practice for code maintainability and readability.
  • 26-36: The updated import_file function now integrates with the new API and utilizes the get_file_text function for fetching file text. This change enhances the functionality and aligns with the objective of supporting imports from nccommons to Wikipedia using a new API. Good job on integrating these changes cohesively.
ncc_core/nc_import/bots/wrk_pages.py (3)
  • 2-2: The addition of the printe import from newapi is a good practice for consistent output across the codebase. This enhances maintainability and readability.
  • 6-11: Switching to triple double quotes for docstrings aligns with Python's convention for docstrings and multiline comments, enhancing readability and consistency. This is a positive change.
  • 39-43: Refactoring the work_one_temp method to handle arguments differently and adding debugging print statements are good practices for enhancing functionality and aiding in troubleshooting. These changes improve the code's maintainability and readability.

ncc_core/nc_import/bots/upload_file.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ncc_core/nc_import/bots/upload_file.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@MrIbrahem MrIbrahem merged commit 52915ed into main Mar 10, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant