Enhance Medwiki Processing and API Integration

[MrIbrahem]

Description

This PR introduces several enhancements across multiple files:

• Enhanced functionality in medwiki.py for better page processing and API integration.
• Refactored reference handling in ref.py to improve clarity and efficiency.
• Adjusted import paths in ref2.py for better organization.
• Expanded text processing capabilities in text_changes.py.
• Improved API interactions in mdwiki_api.py to include revision IDs.
• Added debugging outputs in add_to_wd.py for better traceability.
• Enhanced file handling capabilities in bot1.py.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

medwiki.py Enhanced Medwiki Page Processing and API Integration          copy_to_en/medwiki.py Added functionality to handle page revisions. Enhanced text processing with new reference handling. Improved error handling for API responses. Introduced multiprocessing for efficiency. +204/-0  ref.py Refactoring Reference Handling Logic                                          copy_to_en/ref.py Simplified reference retrieval logic. Updated function to return both references and non-contents. +16/-8    ref2.py Adjusted Reference Fixing Imports                                                copy_to_en/ref2.py Updated import paths for reference fixing. Minor adjustments to improve clarity. +2/-1      text_changes.py Enhanced Text Processing Patterns                                                copy_to_en/text_changes.py Expanded patterns for text processing. Improved handling of temporary patterns. +29/-0    mdwiki_api.py API Enhancements for Page Text Retrieval                                  md_core_helps/apis/mdwiki_api.py Modified API call to include revision IDs. Improved error handling for API responses. +5/-2      add_to_wd.py Debugging Enhancements for WD Bot                                                td_core/after_translate/bots/add_to_wd.py Added print statements for debugging. Improved clarity in function logic. +2/-1      bot1.py Enhanced File Handling in Bot Logic                                            wprefs/bot1.py Added functionality to handle file inputs. Improved random title generation for new pages. +56/-6

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced revision tracking by storing revision IDs for processed pages.
  • Introduced a new script for retrieving and processing Wikipedia article data, including metadata storage.
  • Added functionality to process files and apply transformations based on user input.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved error handling in the Expend_Infobox function to prevent crashes with invalid title inputs.

• Chores

  • Added comments for clarity and documentation purposes.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes across multiple files introduce enhancements to the functionality of the scripts, including improved revision tracking for Wikipedia pages, optional retrieval of revision IDs, and the addition of new scripts for data processing. The modifications encompass updates to function signatures, new functions for handling files and API interactions, and enhanced error handling, all aimed at improving data management and processing capabilities.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
copy_to_en/medwiki.py	Introduced revids dictionary for storing revision IDs, modified get_text to return revision IDs, updated main to write revids to a JSON file, and changed execution logic for testing.
md_core_helps/apis/mdwiki_api.py	Modified GetPageText to include a get_revid parameter, allowing optional retrieval of revision IDs alongside page text, maintaining backward compatibility.
td_core/after_translate/bots/add_to_wd.py	Added a print statement for debugging and ensured output from ss is converted to a string before processing.
td_core/after_translate/mdwikicx.py	Introduced a new script for API interaction to fetch and process Wikipedia article data, including functions for data retrieval and processing, and writing results to a JSON file.
td_core/after_translate/sql_new.py	Added comments for a JSON query URL and database rules, without affecting functionality.
wprefs/bot1.py	Introduced one_file function for file processing, updated main to handle a new file argument, prioritizing file processing over page processing.
wprefs/infobox.py	Enhanced error handling in Expend_Infobox for the title parameter to prevent exceptions during escaping.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Script
    participant API
    participant Database

    User->>Script: Run script with page title
    Script->>API: Fetch page text and revision ID
    API-->>Script: Return page text and revision ID
    Script->>Database: Store page text and revision ID
    Database-->>Script: Confirmation of storage
    Script->>User: Output results

Loading

🐰 In the garden, changes bloom bright,
With scripts that now take flight!
Revision IDs in hand, we cheer,
Processing data far and near.
Each function a hop, each call a leap,
In this code, our secrets we keep! 🌼

Tip

Announcements

• The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment.
• We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
• Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
• Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.
• Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR introduces significant enhancements across multiple files, with complex changes in logic and structure, particularly in medwiki.py and mdwiki_api.py. The refactoring and new functionalities require careful review to ensure correctness and maintainability.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The Create function in medwiki.py does not handle API errors robustly. If the API call fails, it only prints the response without any error handling or logging.
	Possible Bug: In get_text, if mdwiki_api.GetPageText fails to return valid text, the function will return an empty string, which may lead to issues later in the processing pipeline.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Validate the API response status before processing the JSON data Ensure that the API response is checked for success before attempting to parse the JSON data, to avoid potential errors if the request fails. copy_to_en/medwiki.py [65-68] response = requests.post(end_api, data=params) -try: +if response.status_code == 200: print(response.json()) +else: + print(f"Error: {response.status_code} - {response.text}") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a potential bug by ensuring that the API response is validated before processing, which is crucial for error handling in network requests.	9
	Add error handling for the response from the API call Ensure that the output from wikidataapi.post is properly checked for errors before proceeding to avoid potential runtime exceptions. td_core/after_translate/bots/add_to_wd.py [118] +if ss is None: + raise ValueError("No response from wikidataapi.post") printe.output(str(ss)) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding error handling for the API response is essential to prevent runtime exceptions, making this a significant improvement for robustness.	9
	Add exception handling around the page_put function to enhance robustness Ensure that the page_put function handles potential exceptions to prevent the program from crashing unexpectedly. wprefs/bot.py [104] -aa = page_put(text, newtext, "Fix references, Expand infobox #mdwiki .toolforge.org.", title, lang) +try: + aa = page_put(text, newtext, "Fix references, Expand infobox #mdwiki .toolforge.org.", title, lang) +except Exception as e: + logger.error(f"Failed to update page: {e}") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding exception handling around the page_put function is crucial for preventing crashes, making this a highly valuable suggestion for improving code robustness.	9
Best practice	Use logging instead of print for better output management Replace the print statement with a proper logging mechanism to improve the maintainability and configurability of the output. td_core/after_translate/bots/add_to_wd.py [101-102] -print("add_wd:") +logger.info("add_wd:") Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using logging instead of print statements enhances maintainability and allows for better control over output levels, which is crucial for production code.	8
Possible issue	Handle cases where the parsed page may not contain reference tags Ensure that the get_refs function handles cases where alltext may not contain any reference tags to avoid potential errors. copy_to_en/ref.py [11] -ref_tags = parsed_page.get_tags("ref") +ref_tags = parsed_page.get_tags("ref") if parsed_page else [] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves the robustness of the get_refs function by handling cases where no reference tags are found, which can prevent runtime errors.	7
Maintainability	Catch specific exceptions rather than a generic one for better error handling Instead of catching a generic Exception, catch specific exceptions to avoid masking other potential issues. wprefs/infobox.py [63] -except Exception as e: +except (ValueError, TypeError) as e: Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Catching specific exceptions improves error handling and debugging, though the current implementation is not critical enough to warrant a higher score.	7
	Clean up commented-out code for better readability Remove commented-out code to improve code readability and maintainability. wprefs/bot1.py [28] -# from wprefs.api import GetPageText#, page_put +from wprefs.api import GetPageText Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: This suggestion enhances code readability by removing unnecessary comments, but it does not address any critical issues or bugs in the code.	4
Performance	Optimize the lookup performance for checking names to delete Consider using a set for temps_to_delete to improve lookup performance when checking if a name should be deleted. copy_to_en/text_changes.py [71-72] -if name in temps_to_delete: +if name in set(temps_to_delete): Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While this suggestion optimizes performance, the impact is minor compared to the other suggestions, as the current implementation is still functional.	5