Nix CI reverse dependency compatibility testing #2923
Triggered via pull request
December 17, 2024 13:46
Status
Success
Total duration
34m 22s
Artifacts
–
Annotations
45 warnings
checktodos
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
|
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
|
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
|