-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: Mutex locks not released on error #4557
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -264,7 +264,12 @@ class TransactionController extends EventEmitter { | |
// must set transaction to submitted/failed before releasing lock | ||
nonceLock.releaseLock() | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
this.txStateManager.setTxStatusFailed(txId, err) | ||
// this is try-catch wrapped so that we can guarantee that the nonceLock is released | ||
try { | ||
this.txStateManager.setTxStatusFailed(txId, err) | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
console.error(err) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should use |
||
} | ||
// must set transaction to submitted/failed before releasing lock | ||
if (nonceLock) nonceLock.releaseLock() | ||
// continue with error chain | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -49,29 +49,35 @@ class NonceTracker { | |
await this._globalMutexFree() | ||
// await lock free, then take lock | ||
const releaseLock = await this._takeMutex(address) | ||
// evaluate multiple nextNonce strategies | ||
const nonceDetails = {} | ||
const networkNonceResult = await this._getNetworkNextNonce(address) | ||
const highestLocallyConfirmed = this._getHighestLocallyConfirmed(address) | ||
const nextNetworkNonce = networkNonceResult.nonce | ||
const highestSuggested = Math.max(nextNetworkNonce, highestLocallyConfirmed) | ||
|
||
const pendingTxs = this.getPendingTransactions(address) | ||
const localNonceResult = this._getHighestContinuousFrom(pendingTxs, highestSuggested) || 0 | ||
|
||
nonceDetails.params = { | ||
highestLocallyConfirmed, | ||
highestSuggested, | ||
nextNetworkNonce, | ||
try { | ||
// evaluate multiple nextNonce strategies | ||
const nonceDetails = {} | ||
const networkNonceResult = await this._getNetworkNextNonce(address) | ||
const highestLocallyConfirmed = this._getHighestLocallyConfirmed(address) | ||
const nextNetworkNonce = networkNonceResult.nonce | ||
const highestSuggested = Math.max(nextNetworkNonce, highestLocallyConfirmed) | ||
|
||
const pendingTxs = this.getPendingTransactions(address) | ||
const localNonceResult = this._getHighestContinuousFrom(pendingTxs, highestSuggested) || 0 | ||
|
||
nonceDetails.params = { | ||
highestLocallyConfirmed, | ||
highestSuggested, | ||
nextNetworkNonce, | ||
} | ||
nonceDetails.local = localNonceResult | ||
nonceDetails.network = networkNonceResult | ||
|
||
const nextNonce = Math.max(networkNonceResult.nonce, localNonceResult.nonce) | ||
assert(Number.isInteger(nextNonce), `nonce-tracker - nextNonce is not an integer - got: (${typeof nextNonce}) "${nextNonce}"`) | ||
|
||
// return nonce and release cb | ||
return { nextNonce, nonceDetails, releaseLock } | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
// release lock if we encounter an error | ||
releaseLock() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This looks like a great candidate for the |
||
throw err | ||
} | ||
nonceDetails.local = localNonceResult | ||
nonceDetails.network = networkNonceResult | ||
|
||
const nextNonce = Math.max(networkNonceResult.nonce, localNonceResult.nonce) | ||
assert(Number.isInteger(nextNonce), `nonce-tracker - nextNonce is not an integer - got: (${typeof nextNonce}) "${nextNonce}"`) | ||
|
||
// return nonce and release cb | ||
return { nextNonce, nonceDetails, releaseLock } | ||
} | ||
|
||
async _getCurrentBlock () { | ||
|
@@ -85,8 +91,8 @@ class NonceTracker { | |
|
||
async _globalMutexFree () { | ||
const globalMutex = this._lookupMutex('global') | ||
const release = await globalMutex.acquire() | ||
release() | ||
const releaseLock = await globalMutex.acquire() | ||
releaseLock() | ||
} | ||
|
||
async _takeMutex (lockId) { | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -436,28 +436,24 @@ module.exports = class MetamaskController extends EventEmitter { | |
* @returns {Object} vault | ||
*/ | ||
async createNewVaultAndKeychain (password) { | ||
const release = await this.createVaultMutex.acquire() | ||
let vault | ||
|
||
const releaseLock = await this.createVaultMutex.acquire() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can the mutex acquisition ever fail? Should we move this asynchronous operation inside the try / catch as well, or is that overly-cautious? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. acquisition should never fail |
||
try { | ||
let vault | ||
const accounts = await this.keyringController.getAccounts() | ||
|
||
if (accounts.length > 0) { | ||
vault = await this.keyringController.fullUpdate() | ||
|
||
} else { | ||
vault = await this.keyringController.createNewVaultAndKeychain(password) | ||
const accounts = await this.keyringController.getAccounts() | ||
this.preferencesController.setAddresses(accounts) | ||
this.selectFirstIdentity() | ||
} | ||
release() | ||
releaseLock() | ||
return vault | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
release() | ||
releaseLock() | ||
throw err | ||
} | ||
|
||
return vault | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
|
@@ -466,7 +462,7 @@ module.exports = class MetamaskController extends EventEmitter { | |
* @param {} seed | ||
*/ | ||
async createNewVaultAndRestore (password, seed) { | ||
const release = await this.createVaultMutex.acquire() | ||
const releaseLock = await this.createVaultMutex.acquire() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Very readable renaming. |
||
try { | ||
// clear known identities | ||
this.preferencesController.setAddresses([]) | ||
|
@@ -476,10 +472,10 @@ module.exports = class MetamaskController extends EventEmitter { | |
const accounts = await this.keyringController.getAccounts() | ||
this.preferencesController.setAddresses(accounts) | ||
this.selectFirstIdentity() | ||
release() | ||
releaseLock() | ||
return vault | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
release() | ||
releaseLock() | ||
throw err | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was
setTxStatusFailed()
throwing uncaught errors? Looking at it, it seems so straight forward. In fact, even its own internal_setTxStatus(id, status)
method has its own try/catch.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i treated it as a black box and assumed errors could come from it
its possible errors could come from an eventemitter handler